As a white collar crime speaker (I address groups on white collar crime, fraud and how to avoid it), I have followed closely the trial of Stephen Michael Ewing, Gary Trebert and Larry May – all charged with massive tax fraud – $34 million to be exact.
According to the US Attorney’s office, the government presented evidence that beginning in August 1999 and continuing through mid-May 2004, Ewing, along with co-defendants, Gary Trebert and Larry May, conspired together, and with others, to defraud the U.S. by impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful government functions of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the ascertainment, computation, assessment, and collection of the revenue, that is, nursing facility employees’ withheld income taxes, social security taxes and medicare taxes, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the administration of the Social Security Act and the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Both Trebert and May plead guilty and Trebert agreed to cooperate with the federal government in the prosecution of Ewing in return for a 2 year reduction in his 10 year sentence. May is scheduled to be sentenced on April 28, 2008; Trebert is scheduled to be sentenced on July 14, 2008.
Unlike the others, Stephen Michael Ewing elected to plead not guilty and take the issue to trial. He was found Guilty!
Again, according to the US Attorney, both Trebert and May testified against Ewing at trial. Trebert testified that he and Ewing repeatedly discussed the creation and the overseas payroll companies to interfere with IRS efforts to collect the payroll taxes. Trebert also testified that Ewing once boasted about having previously operated nursing homes without having to pay the payroll taxes. Larry May testified that Trebert and Ewing made him president of the company, even though he told them he was not qualified.
May further testified that, during some of the periods covered by the Indictment, he was making $10,000 to $25,000 per month for doing little more than signing documents, including tax returns, and taking tax returns to England to mail back to the IRS in the U.S. More than 150 sham staffing/payroll entities, many with foreign business addresses at drop boxes in England and Austria, were created to file Form 941 employer withholding tax returns with the IRS, preventing the IRS from assessing and attempting to collect more than $34 million of unpaid payroll tax liabilities from Trebert, Ewing and May, and creating the appearance that these sham staffing/payroll entities employed more than 4500 nursing facility employees, when they did not.
Were they the smartest guys in the room? Often I have been asked that question and the answer is – Yes! At the time of the crime, more times than not, the white collar criminal does think that he or she has outsmarted the system. It appears obvious that all three felt that the offshore shame companies would be so hard to trace that somehow they would get by. The deception of ego is often the beginning of the end. The deception can be so mentally profound that ones fails to recognize truth. Just like the law of gravity, there is a fundamental truth that evades the “smarter than the system” criminal. That truth is – every choice has a consequence!
More times than not there are tell tail signs that a fraud is unraveling. While I was not personally close to this case, I have studied the science of fraud and crime enough to know that external markers often precede the downfall of the criminal. In the case of these defendants, they diverted to themselves and their personal activities substantial sums of money derived from their nursing home operations and from the non-payment of employees’ withheld payroll taxes. At trial, the government presented evidence that, during the period covered by the Indictment, Ewing spent more than $2.5 million in money derived from the nursing home operations on his personal expenses. The total expenditures included more than $200,000 at department stores such as Saks Fifth Avenue, and more than $250,000 on automobiles.
You reap what you sow. In this case, justice was done – eventually.
Your comments are welcome!
In his Poignant, High-Energy, Thought-Provoking and Honest Motivational Presentations Chuck Shows Organizations how to:
- Transform self-limiting beliefs into personal and organizational success
- Help employees increase ethics awareness and reduce fraud
- Understand the effect of choices on their personal and professional lives


March 11, 2008 at 1:18 pm
Well – Aren’t you the smart one in the room now? And wouldn’t you really like to know the other side of that story. However, SME chose to rest his case on the hopes that the prosecution witnesses had left enough holes in the whole story that the jury would realize everything was not as it initially appears… or more importantly… not as the govt prosecutors would have you believe. The witnesses clearly did not respond the way the govt prosecutors had expected. I think a much more important application of your investigative time would be to research the lies the prosecution was able to tell… how they threatened the potential witnesses… how they harrassed others.. how they made under-the-table deals with others. Even if you wanted to find SME guilty, how much better it would have been to do so in the fairness of our legal system, and not from all the deals that could be made to buy testimony. I would so like to know how that is legal in our system. Wouldn’t it be interesting to discover if there was witness tampering by the prosecution? How do we as citizens protect ourselves from that kind of legal “fairness?”
March 11, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Interesting post. You seem to have some insight into this conviction. Since the other two plead guilty, does it really mean that something went wrong for SME to be convicted? Is it possible he is guilty? Why not air what you know so that the truth can be revealed. I am open to future posts!
March 12, 2008 at 12:38 pm
If airing the truth could really do some good, I’d be all for that. However, people have already formulated opinions based on public testimony in court. And everyone tells the truth in court, don’t they? Even when they have nothing to lose. I wish someone could explain to me the line that can be drawn between conspiracy and knowing enough to blow the whistle….. discovering what is going on at the direction of someone else…. finally realizing you’re not going to be able to bring about a change in that course…. then going to authorities and being told you’ll have immunity, so spill your guts. Then you spill your guts and provide everything in the world to the authorities…. including your own personal receipts for purchases… and your rights aren’t read to you until several days later…. and you’re stupid enough to think that their word means something. After all, they are the “authorities.” But you never get the promise for immunity in writing…. so it never happened. And you wind up building the case for the prosecution…. and they use it all against you. The case goes beyond guilty or innocent. I don’t think anyone would say anyone in this case is “innocent.” But someone needs to get involved in citizens’ rights vs our Fed. govt. What all went on here was a travesty of justice….. on both sides. You, the jury and the public are only seeing one side.. the side the govt wanted to present to you. There is quite a book waiting to be written by someone who will seriously dig and discover how our judicial system worked in these cases. Did it fail?….. No. But does it give me serious doubts about how OUR govt is allowed to operate?… YES. For the first time, I am afraid of this country…. I am suspect of our govt. And I’m even a Republican!
March 13, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Actually I had the opportunity to work with Ewing. I know for a fact that the scam he perpetrated was being investigated back in the early ’90s.
I in no way doubt the guilt he is now paying for…..
March 16, 2008 at 12:42 am
I am a member of Stephen Michael Ewing’s family. The entire story was not presented in court because he stopped it – didnt want the world to know the entire story. How he tried to set up members of our family to take the fall. Whomever this BAS person is, they clearly did not know what the true story is. Yes as DFW said Steve was being investigated back in the 90s. He should have been stopped then. He is now where he needs to be. For one that knows the true story, there is no doubt he is deserving of the sentence. Unfortunately the govt did not get his wife (who was totally in on it) and offspring. They have brought shame and heartache to our family. Supposedly Steve went to the authorities, but did not tell the truth.The govt worked with my family for years on this case. There was no threats, deals or harrasements. Whomever, BAS is they need to stop
stating things that are not true. Why dont they tell us who they really are? Unfortunately for my family, the day after Steve was found guilty, my brother passed away. He testified, and I so glad that he got to tell the truth. May he rest in peace.
I hope the spouse rots in hell, she was born there.
March 16, 2008 at 4:53 pm
How sad… how very sad. Yep – Someone ought to write a book…. What do they say?…. You can’t make this stuff up?
March 16, 2008 at 5:57 pm
I’ve worked with mr Ewing in the nursing hme business since the 90’s. He was the one who fought for the residents when his partners wouldn’t or couldn’t. He has genersously given so many residents and employees money out of his pocket, I have witnessed this over and over. A kind hearted person who has always been a respected operator over the years. I know a little about the background of the FAM commenter above. Also having family in the St Louis area, Mr Ewing and I have discussed at length his sister and her adult children. He has provided for this family housing, money, vehicles and not to mention employed all but one of the family in hopes that they could live with respect of earning their own way. I think that when the money stopped they stabbed him in the back. The Govt was probably the instagator of this behavior. The loss of life of a relative after being pressured by the government is certainly a sad issue. BAS is correct. Very sad indeed.
Although I may be guilty as well, I think FAM needs to keep the family and personal issues for another venue, like the Springer hour?
THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO REMOVE OFFENSIVE REMARKS…CHUCK GALLAGHER
March 17, 2008 at 6:38 am
Amen, JAD, amen.
March 17, 2008 at 11:30 am
JAD, you are a fool. Steve might have told you those things. None true. We are all well respected members of our community. And do not live in the St. Louis area. Steve was a problem and embarrasment to our family for as long as I can remember, beginning when he used to steal from the lumber yard he worked out, would take the money to paint houses and never do the job- my grandfather and my brother who passed away completed the job – he presented false credentials that long ago. My grandparents paid for 8 years of college education – from which he NEVER graduated. Which college did he tell you he attended – Harvard or Princeton – he was never at either one of them.
He stole the residents spending monies – he is where he needs to be and should have been there long ago. Hopefully they are watching his wife – who knew and is as guilty as he in my opinon. He taught Trebert and May – believe me. Perhaps you, JAD were in on it as well? May be you should be looked at? The feds have been nothing but respectful and kind to my family. They have been great. I am so glad my little brother got to testify against that monster. Bless you Brent and may you rest in peace.
I pray that the spouse will be watched and brought to justice as well. JAD you are a suffering fool. Dont speak of who you do not know for a fact. Oh yes another lie from SME is – we dont live in the ST. louis area.
March 17, 2008 at 12:33 pm
ANd if you are so informed tell me – how many pills a day did SME take to function?
There must have been many.
March 17, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Mr. Gallagher:
Why do you approve comments from trolls??
March 17, 2008 at 2:18 pm
TROLLS? Help me understand?
March 17, 2008 at 2:38 pm
There’s a scary thing happening these days in the professional blogging world. It seems that the message board trolls, you know, the ones who have spent years yelling like jerks on message boards all over the Internet, have figured out that they can bring their toxic behavior over to blogs.
I stopped reading message boards about 3-years ago to get away from message board trolls. Now they’ve infiltrated the blogging world and I’m once again forced to be a part of their incessant name-calling, screaming, tantrums, outrageous claims, stubbornness, lack of intelligence and general genetic acumen for always being right, no matter what. Keep it smarter Mr Gallagher.
March 17, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Now I think I know who JAD is – of course you worked iwth him in the 90s. you were his right hand man and your son followed in your footsteps. you were a fool then and you are apparently still a fool. I am not screaming or doing a thing but stating the truth, whether you like it or not. Steve Ewing never gave a damn about anything but
scamming and defrauding the US gov. and by doing that – defrauded and scammed us all. Perhaps he handed some underpaid employee a dollar – but then bounced their check, or did not pay the payroll tax. Perhaps he bought some resident a honeybun and then turned around and stole their spending money. Get real Mr. D. We know who you are – and you in my opinion you should be brought to justice as well. There is much more to this story and I am proud that he is where he needs to be. Hopefully they will watch and get the rest of you. It is much like the Sopranos – organized crime.
SME even drove the vehicle Tony did.
March 18, 2008 at 6:44 am
I was hoping for an intelligent conversation on this site…. about facts… about justice… about govt. Obviously, I got sidetracked. I’m signing off this. It’s like I picked up a book written by the devil who’s spewing vile stuff. This is the first blog I every really read… and the first one I ever participated in. I think I’ll pariticipate OUT. One thing though…. no one is going to have to invest any time in trying to convince any readers what kind of person this FAM is…. She has done an excellent job on her own. If there’s anyone left out there, perhaps we’ll meet up somewhere and have those intelligent discussions. I could do some venting myself, but not at this level. We all have dirty laundry, I suppose. But you know what? Mine just ain’t this dirty! :- )
March 18, 2008 at 6:46 am
TO ALL WHO COMMENT: This blog relates to the crime, the choices, and the consequences. It is NOT A FORUM for personal attacks.
PLEASE FOCUS YOUR COMMENTS on the crime, the choices and the consequences. Continued personal attacks will be removed and your opportunity to comment will be restricted.
PLEASE FOCUS ON THE ISSUES and eliminate personal attacks as they serve no purpose!
March 18, 2008 at 8:12 am
I am only commenting on the person who committed the crime – others commented on the victims – our family – and personally attacked us. You dont want to know the entire story.
You have a rosy view and are trying to convince others of the goodness of the convicted one. You dont like it someone tells something you dont want to hear – you should leave the victims out – or include all of them – but maybe there would not be room for mentioning all of them – the poor old people who went without -and on and on. And by the way,
what makes you so sure I am a “she”?
March 18, 2008 at 9:09 am
PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED THAT SEEM TO HAVE A PERSONAL ATTACK TONE OR ARE STATED IN A WAY THAT MAKES OVERTLY NEGATIVE COMMENTS ABOUT ANOTHER HUMAN BEING.
ALLOW ME TO ENCOURAGE ANY WHO COMMENT TO MAKE COMMENTS THAT DEAL WITH FACTS! ANY PERSONAL OPINIONS ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE UNRELATED TO THE CASE ARE INAPPROPRIATE FOR THIS FORUM.
THOSE WHO WERE PERSONALLY HARMED BY MR. EWING, MR. MAY OR MR. TREBERT MY FEEL FREE TO COMMENT AS LONG AS THE COMMENT RELATES TO YOUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN THIS CASE.
March 18, 2008 at 11:46 am
Thanks for removing those comments. My family was part of the crowd of victims and I will certainly comment on it. I feel the stress of it was certainly a contributing factor to my brothers death. It has been a burden on our family for years. It is beyond belief that one person such as Stephen Michael Ewing would do that to members of his own family. And for what, trips to Saks, $1500 purses? Cadillacs, Lexus, and Mercedes Benz? I am sure that he talked a good game to those of you who feel that he is a good person. That is the way people like that work. My family in no way ever received anything that was previously stated on here. Perhaps it was put in one of our names, but we never saw any of those things. Some of you dont like what I said, but the truth certainly can and will hurt. Stephen Michael Ewing has serious issues. I hope that he and his people get the help they most certainly need. Shame on those of you who tried to speak ill of my deceased brother and my elderly mother. Shame shame. At some point karma, God or whatever you choose, will give you, like it did Stephen Michael Ewing, what you so richly deserve!
March 18, 2008 at 12:46 pm
I was actually present in the courtroom when the gentleman Robert Burroughs walked into the courtroom and took the stand. Robert Burroughs testified against Stephen Michael Ewing concerning his name being used on various documents pertaining to health care matters. Robert Burroughs told the court that he raises crickets and grasshoppers for a living, hoping one day to have them sold to a bait shop to in turn be used by a thriving fisherman. To everyone’s surprise, the judge remarked that he himself had some crickets at his home and would Robert like to transport them back to Illinois. The courtroom burst out in laughter. The attorney for Stephen Michael Ewing caught Mr. Burroughs at least three different times perjuring himself. Robert seemed to fashion most of his blame towards his own brother, whom he said he supplied all of his personal information to in order to send to Stephen Ewing. Mr. Burroughs was asked repeatedly about whether he knew an individual by the name of Danielle Cochrane. These exchanges were absolutely breathtaking. After telling the prosecution repeatedly that he had never heard the name Danielle Cochrane before in his life, he admitted to Stephen Michael Ewing’s attorney that in fact he had received a power of attorney from Danielle Cochrane, and that he lost it, but found it several days ago and has it in his hotel room for the prosecution to look at. I thought the prosecution team was going to fall out of their chairs after Mr. Burroughs made these admissions to the Court. As a spectator I had to feel sorry for Mr. Burroughs in that he perjured himself over and over again. I have been following this case closely throughout the past year or so and decided to attend the trial. The testimony of Robert Burroughs really stood out in my mind, and I just wanted to express what transpired during cross examination.
March 18, 2008 at 3:22 pm
SUre you were there – as was I and this is not the truth. Sorry – lies again. Cynthia,
this is only heresay from you and cant you read that this sort of thing is not to be posted. Shame on you for lying and especially about my deceased brother. You must be a follower of SME – you have the knack of telling the opposite of the truth. Yes,
my brother worked in a place that did that – not raised them himself. If you can not get that right then one would question what else you have wrong – I was there I know what was said – let my brother rest in peace – shame on you.
March 18, 2008 at 3:44 pm
By the way CYNTHIA you really might want to know that while my brother was testifying he was dying and he died the next day. How dare you tell things that are not true – that is not the way it happened – and furthermore, what you have stated is your opinon – you are not supplying court transcripts only what you say went on. Dont you have any sort of life – are you just the type that gets their kicks from parasitic obsession with things like this? Deal with what SME, and the other two actually did – not what you are saying my brother said or did. You cant even get the simpliest of things correct, perhaps you have a disability But talk about what the three actually did – not what you percieve happened.
March 18, 2008 at 4:19 pm
This has been a very interesting and active post. There seems to be a real issue with the perception of what TRUTH is. Fascinating! As a disinterested third party that talks about White Collar Crime and the consequences that follow – one thing is true, people see truth from different perspectives and often the real truth is somewhere in between. It appears that internal family squabbles are part of the outcome of the choices made. What ever or whom ever make choices there are always unintended consequences and pain that follows. Stephen Michael Ewing made choices (what I don’t know for sure), and those choices have caused obvious pain to family, friends and former co-workers.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to focus on current choices and how those choice could help you moving forward instead of continuing to bring up old resentments that fester pain. The choices you make today will bring about the results you get in the future. Victim or not, Ewing’s fate is now in the hands of the judge and likely Ewing will face substantial time in federal prison. Those left behind would do well to focus on what will help them move forward into a better place.
Having been there – I speak from experience.
March 18, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Hello FAM, I am only stating the truth. Insinuating that I am disabled just because I wrote what I witnessed is pretty charming I must admit. I will make it a top priority to pray for you from now on. I am sorry about your deceased brother Robert Burroughs. I’m sure he was a fine gentleman. I remember the prosecutor asking Mr. Burroughs about his daughter. I will pray for her as well. I’m sure he loved you with all of his heart and supplied you with everlasting brotherly love. Now if you would like to dispute anything else I said in the last post other than the fact that the company Mr. Burroughs worked for raised crickets for fishing, then please feel free to do so, if indeed you were present in court, instead of just taking the easy way out and simply calling me a liar. All you seem interested in doing on Mr. Gallagher’s blog is to viciously attack everyone and anyone who comments here. We should thank Mr. Gallagher for supplying the public a forum to discuss these various white collar criminal matters. Robert Burroughs repeatedly perjured himself on the witness stand. The prosecutor even admitted in his closing arguments that it didn’t matter one way or the other whether Robert Burroughs told the truth or not, and he was a government witness. Stephen Michael Ewing’s attorney several times had to refer Mr. Burroughs back to his own statements he made to the FBI because he knew Mr. Burroughs had perjured himself. What Mr. Burroughs was telling the Court didn’t seem to match up with what he had told the FBI when they interviewed him. I sat through all but one day of the trial and it was clear to me that Robert Burroughs committed perjury under oath as he knew he was not telling the truth. We can certainly talk about these three men and what they did. Two of the men pled guilty and testified against Stephen Michael Ewing. Mr. Ewing’s attorney said in closing arguments that Mr. Ewing wanted his day in court. Mr. Ewing was found guilty by a jury. So lets please discuss the facts of the case and what transpired in the courtroom, and not play attack the messenger. I’m sure Mr. Gallagher would like that as well.
March 18, 2008 at 7:13 pm
My, my, my you are the bitter one FAM. I have been following this blog and until now I have kept my hands tied so I would not reply but I now find myself typing and I am specifically adressing FAM.
I to know SME, his wife and his children I was a whole lot closer than you would ever imagine, and I beg to differ with you, I know May and Trebert as well, and i’m someone that DOES know more than you. YOU are the one speculating, YOU are going from what YOU may or may not have HEARD in court and YOU have decided which version of the story YOU are going to believe and spout about. Funny thing is FAM, even though people swear to “tell the truth” they still don’t always do it, don’t be so naive. I saw both sides IN PERSON and NONE of the other parties needed to be “taught” anything by SME trust me they had their own agendas from the beginning.
I am so very sorry to hear about your brother (I knew him too) and yes may he rest in peace, but FAM, both you and I know he knew very well what he was doing, and if you know as much as you CLAIM you do, then we both know who he sent down her to do it on his behalf, and that’s all I will say regarding that.
Now, to SME: JAD is not who you think they are (something else you don’t know) however, he/she is speaking factually about Mr. Ewing’s generosity towards the residents, and I DEFY you to find any nursing home operator that knows residents in as many as 52 nursing homes by NAME and would POST his PERSONAL CELL PHONE NUMBER, (bet you didn’t know that either FAM).
I could go on and on and I could tell you plenty that you don’t know about SME, Trebert, May, Burroughs, Cochren, and the names go on and on, but my main point FAM is YOU DON’T KNOW ANYTHING, and, YOU AND I both know that SME was taking care of many people in Illinois and you should be ashamed of yourself, what’s the matter, can’t you pay your bills anymore, are you missing his help and now you’re mad. Get a life FAM
You can type whatever you want with regard to this post I know the truth and i’m betting you do too FAM (but you don’t have to type it, it will be our secret, shhh). Mr. Ewing is not as guilty as it appears, i’m not saying he’s 100% innocent, but he is certainly not as guilty as everyone has been led to believe.
To readers of this post (NOT FAM) anyone that says SME was a bad nursing home operator is talking out the the wrong orifice of their body, he may be many things, but a bad nursing home operator is not one of them.
FAM, fell free to respond with whatever you want, I will not be back to this site, and I will never read it, I can no longer read your dribble, please get a life and hopefully a job since you can’t call SME for money any more.
March 18, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Hi Cynthia – How nice to be able to talk to someone who was also there! I was there only on the last day. Did you understand the jury instructions read by the judge? The conspiracy explanation gave no wiggle room for whistle blowing. Although the judge read instructions for 40 min, that one item instructed the jury that if they agreed that SME knew what was going on (i.e. knew enough to blow the whistle), then they had to find him guilty of conspiracy. I wonder if that “rule” is consistent from one similar trial to another, or if that can be explained differently depending on…. who writes those instructions? It’s like…. darned if you do and darned if you don’t. Would he have been better off to ride it out and see just when someone would step in and still find him guilty in the end? That instruction to the jury has me really baffled….
Which witness do you think did the most damage to SME’s case? Anything to indicate to you… like with Robert… that you doubted their testimony?
March 18, 2008 at 8:47 pm
As an outsider comment…it is fairly easy to find guilt on a conspiracy charge. Conspiracy is simple to prove and difficult to gain a not guilty verdict from. My question is why didn’t Ewing just plead guilty? It would seem that he would have been able to cut a deal better than what he got from a trial when everyone knows the federal government wants to win.
Any insight into Ewing’s innocent plea?
March 18, 2008 at 9:01 pm
Well, Chuck, that’s exactly what happened…. he was found guilty in 60 min. The conspiracy charge could not be overcome. It has been quoted that SME “wanted his day in court.” I’m sure he was warned of the guilty verdict that was waiting for him. I know this very thing has been more difficult for his family than probably for SME, himself. I’d personally like to whack him over the head. But, you know, there are those times in life, I guess, that you have to know…. Is there a chance I could be found not guilty? I think it was the stone he couldn’t leave unturned. But I do think it was probably a selfish decision…. However, since I have not discussed this with him, this is pure speculation on my part.
March 18, 2008 at 9:18 pm
For those who pay attention to the legal system…unless you are squeaky clean (clearly not guilty) – if there is any twinge of guilty…you are better off pleading than going to trial. With a fraud that large – and since I follow these I have to admit the dollar amount is large – a finding on not guilty would have taken a miracle.
I can’t begin to know what SME was thinking and respect someone wanting their day in court. However, the outcome is predictable. Having been there – federal prison – I can say it is now time for people to take account for whatever responsibility they may have had as all is not as it seems most of the time.
I was guilty of my crimes, yet, those who were connected to me had issues to deal with as well. I may have suffered a conviction and time in prison, but others suffered as well. The sooner each person accepted responsibility for their actions the quicker healing took place.
Just an observation…
March 19, 2008 at 6:20 am
Chuck – If you don’t mind… How much time did you serve in prison? Where? I’m assuming you plead guilty? Laws… or rules? guidelines?… have changed in the last few years so that white collar crime is more agressively punished/sentenced now. I understand that sentencing is based on some kind of formula which is based on how much time/money was spent by the govt prosecution (in addition to the determined fraud amount). But I’m still hung up on the whistle blowing part…. it’s like I asked/said earlier…… it’s interesting to think that SME might have been just as well off to continue with the company, instead of bringing in the authorities. However, I face difficult issues with my work here and there, but certainly not legal issues… I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t want those kinds of issues to deal with day in day out. I’m sure you have to make the decision to get out for your sanity’s sake. I can’t imagine what it must be like to see all this happening around you, and you virtually cannot do anything about it other than continue to play, or scream out for help.
March 19, 2008 at 6:39 am
This man is mentally unstable. SME plead guilty simply due to the fact that he actually THOUGHT he was innocent. He stated this more than once throughout the years and whether anyone wants to believe it or not, I was around when he said that very thing. I talked to him during the trial, on two different occasions no less, and he honestly believed that he was going to get off the hook. He never said he “wanted his day in court.” Instead, he said that he wanted his “story to be told.” I am sure this was deeply encouraged by his spouse or perhaps even a sibling, but who am I to speculate.
It is simply disturbing that someone can get away with something like this for SO long and honestly feel that there was nothing wrong with it! Perhaps some people like to believe that this man sent his family members in IL money to “support” them and buy them houses and cars and whatnot but is that really the truth? It is a fact, however, that this man spent a quarter of a million dollars at Saks Fifth Avenue during one season alone, purchased countless expensive cars for his three family members, took “vacations” to Austria and elsewhere, and even spent a ridiculous amount of money on pets! I digress. Regardless of how he spent this money, it was NOT his to spend! The money WAS that of the federal government and the individuals that live in this country.
Perhaps when this man is taken out of his cell in the psychiatric ward, if it actually happens, he will serve his time in prison and pay for what he has done.
EDITORIAL COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE – KEEP COMMENTS TO SPECIFIC ISSUES RELATED TO THE CRIME. EXPRESSIONS OF MENTAL INSTABILITY ARE INAPPROPRIATE UNLESS THEY ARE STATEMENTS OF FACT. THEY ARE SUBJECT TO BEING REMOVED.
March 19, 2008 at 6:42 am
I plead guilty to tax evasion and embezzlement for crimes committed in the ’80’s. I served time in federal prison in 1995-96. I was sentenced to 18 months active and 3 years supervised release. I was sentenced under the sentencing guidelines and they have not changed much since then – except for certain drug convictions.
At some point it is necessary to take responsibility for our actions. While I did not enjoy prison – terrible experience – it was the best thing that happened to me. What a true learning opportunity.
Perhaps all who have been hurt here will find the time to move past the pain, blame and name calling and reflect on how they can make effective choices to heal and be better in the future than they are today.
Chuck
March 19, 2008 at 6:45 am
I don’t know what other people THINK they know but I know that what I have been told by federal agents and what I have witnessed first-hand is actually TRUE. This man did not “blow the whistle” on himself! The federal government had been watching him for YEARS… In fact, it was probably for a longer amount of time than what anyone on this forum thinks it was.
SME went to the authorities, yes. However! He DID NOT tell the truth during this so-called “confession.” Instead, he LIED about what he had done! Why did he do it in that fashion? Why couldn’t he have just told the truth? It’s not like the federal government didn’t know what he had done anyway!
March 19, 2008 at 6:54 am
Chuck – Did/Do you find that you are able, after prison, to rejoin society and have a “regular life?” What was taken from you that you miss the most because of your conviction? I’m sure you can choose to make this experience a negative one or a positive one. Whatever family you had… if this was when you were mid-late 20’s… you still aren’t very old… did this “brand” them? Of course, you’ve since chosen a life path that puts this in the public eye everyday. Did you get support for that? Or did you find that this was something you had to do, regardless of the support? Sorry if these are questions I shouldn’t be asking, but I think it’s part of looking forward for SME’s family and associates…. Although there is still a lot of negative stuff to deal with daily…. and will be for awhile.
March 19, 2008 at 6:59 am
If we ignore “It,” will “It” go away? Probably not, but I’m willing to try if anyone else wants to…..
March 19, 2008 at 7:29 am
he will more than likely spend the rest of his life behind bars, preferably he will get the help he needs there. It is unfortunate that he got away with it for so long. And, regardless, it is a FACT that he spend much of the money that was not his at SAKS,
and for vehicles, trips, and the like – all with money that was not his. Lengthy college educations at expensive schools – all paid for with the govt money not his. We are the just a few of his victims – and yes I am angry, bitter and filled with grief over what has happened. My brother had no choice but to go and tesify as did the rest of them. Believe me there were many more from Illinois waiting to testify. As far as a GOOD nursing home operator – there and pages and pages of deaths, abandonments, and the like – what a shame.
March 19, 2008 at 8:11 am
I know that mother & daughter have both been commenting under FAM. Now this new ”
“… can’t tell yet if this mother…. or possibly someone else. Definitely the same hateful tone. Nothing going on here that’s positive! You know… if they feel like their side “won,” why do they continue to sound like the loosers? Oh well….. the rest of us have a living to make…. and I need to spend time making mine!
March 19, 2008 at 9:14 am
Mr Gallagher:
I too attended the trial. Offered as testimony was evidence that SME expenditures were spread out over a 5 yr period…. There was also $35,000.00 in donations given to his church…. That thousands were sent to relatives in IL for various reasons. $2500.00 to Freeman Spur Water works for Robert Burroughs stands out as does $1,200.00+ monthly mortgage payments made towards the home that SME’s mother, sister, nephew and great nephew occupied. Then the evidence of paychecks made out to and cashed by Robert Burroughs and Blake Burroughs for years of employment. And yes, also evidence that SME fed and provided his pets with vet care. Shame on him!
BAS, I also am interested in the jury instructions and why the prosecution gets to write them? I found that to be profoundly unfair. It appears that the odds are clearly against the defendant before you get started to defend yourself (as you stated Mr Gallagher). The govt seems to be allowed to manipulate the evidence into whatever is necessary to prove their case. The lead prosecutor will soon be retiring after years of devoted service to our Govt and within the legal community he is a legend. It is said that the only place he can hide is behind a corkscrew…
Larry May testimony revealed that he and SME were not the ones responsible for paying those taxes and that most or all of the conspiracy issues were schemed by Gary Trebert, an attorney, Mary Vance, an attorney who was formerly with the IRS and also represented Larry May in IRS issues and Treberts office staff of attorneys that also have/had IRS and 941 issues. It is those persons that had been investigated for years. There is evidence of this within the PACER system that clearly shows their previous and continued legal tax issues. This is not Gary Treberts first indictment either.
This case was/is very complicated. There was never testimony or evidence of issues of care within their homes. It is a fact that people die in nursing homes and sadly, some are abandoned by their families. But whether or not 941’s are paid or not does not reflect on the quality of care that was provided.
Cynthia, I am also interested in your observations of other witnesses and evidence. Do you recall the testimony of Dot Cole who if I recall, is head of licensing with DADS?
What about Jeff Head the CFO who received total immunity for his testimony and the CPA from Wichita Falls? There were 5 or 6 un-indicted co-conspirators??? Dozens given immunity. Yes, extremely complicated and very emotional…. for ALL the friends and family involved.
March 19, 2008 at 9:16 am
Dont know what BAS thinks they know but whatever. There are no winners here and have never claimed to be. The FACTs are that the money was not SME to spend at SAKS – or to purchase expensive vehicles for the spouse and offspring – and lengthy
expensive schooling – while all the while bills went unpaid at nursing homes, proper care was not taken of the residents,payroll checks were bouncing for employees – and this is all over the internet – several wrongful death suits have been filed – you are quite the smart one there BAS – arent you? SME
had a long history of deceit, and theft just to mention a few things. Facts nothing more.
I find it very sad that you choose to attack the victims – perhaps you are one of those that is at this very moment wearing some of that clothing from SAkS? Who knows and who care. We are all gainfully employed and have always made our own living regardless of what you might have been told or think. We are just a fraction of the victims of this – sounds to me like you are pretty bitter there BAS – no more clothing from SAKS – and no more expensive cars or schooling. Tough life ahead for you without the govt money to finance you and your mother and brother. It is indeed too bad that SME has had to pay twice for your lifestyle.
March 19, 2008 at 10:07 am
The five year period “southern girl” is speaking of is the 5 year period that was in question. The SAKS money was one season. Takes lots of work to dress for SMU, doestnt IT? RIdiculously expensive vehicles and extravagant trips. SG you are realll uininformed as to what the truth is
March 19, 2008 at 10:07 am
QUESTION RESPONSES: These are made my me – Chuck Gallagher – and relate to my experience preceding – during – and post prison. Hopefully they will be helpful.
PRE-PRISON: Unlike many, I made the choice when my crimes were uncovered to take a different approach – FULL ACCOUNTABILITY! It would have been easy for me to blame circumstances for the reason for my crime. It would have been easy to become a victim and play that emotional card to its fullest. It would have been easy to run or fight. NONE of those choices would provide what really needed to be done. I have found that accepting full accountability for the choices we make is the first step to healing.
In my case, regardless of whom I want to point the finger at – I was the one that made the decisions that were wrong and for which I was punished.
My wife (now ex-wife) had a hard time with accepting any accountability on her part. While she didn’t steal any money – I did that – she benefited from the funds and enjoyed them while they were there. That is not to say that it was in any way her fault – IT WAS NOT. IT WAS MINE! But, it has been harder for her to recover as the acceptance of any personal accountability has been hard for her. The reality check is – anyone who enjoyed the fruits of ill gotten gains has some personal accountability for the ultimate outcome. While Ewing may spend the rest of his life in prison, others are imprisoned by their emotions, anger etc.
Another comment will follow outlining other stages
March 19, 2008 at 10:12 am
well said, Chuck – If they are allowed to keep their expensive cars, clothing,apartments and homes I indeed think it said that SME is paying twice.
March 19, 2008 at 10:16 am
PROSECUTION: I elected to plead guilty. Consider this – committing a crime is guilt. Condoning a crime is guilt. Thinking about committing a crime is guilt. Each may be different levels of guilt, but all can find someone guilty.
EXAMPLE: An inmate when I was in federal prison was there for conspiracy to sell drugs. He was asked by his sister’s (no good) boyfriend about who sold cocaine. He replied twice that he didn’t know. When asked the 3rd time – he became indignant and told him to talk to “John Doe” from high school…he was the druggie back then. THAT SIMPLE STATEMENT cost him 5 years in federal prison for conspiracy to sell drugs.
REALITY CHECK: While I don’t know SME or any of the people who have posted – I can say with some reasonable certainty – if you run a business you need to know what is going on with it. You can’t reasonably assume everything is right and not pay $34 million in payroll taxes. Free flowing money comes from somewhere. To stick one’s head in the sand and assume you have no responsibility for knowing where it comes from is wrong and generally will earn a conviction for the responsible party.
IN MY CASE: I admitted my guilt. I lost my license as a CPA. I lost the career that I worked so hard to grow. I did make complete restitution – yet I was still prosecuted by the federal government – and it was appropriate.
EVERY CHOICE HAS A CONSEQUENCE! You do reap what you sow and that law of the universe cannot be avoided. The consequences may not be pleasant, but they are part of our growth.
Another comment will follow
March 19, 2008 at 10:27 am
FAM:
EVIDENCE shown in the courtroom disclosed that ALL personal expenditures were over a 5 yr period. You seem to be quoting what may have been written PRETRIAL by the FTW Star Telegram. Based on your knowledge, it does not appear that you were actually in attendance at trial as you stated. It’s also quite possible that you were listed on the defendants witness list, therefore you would have been restricted from observing the trial.
Your bitterness and jealousy is eating you alive. I will pray for you as well.
Thank you Mr Gallagher for giving us the opportunity to discuss the facts of this trial. Your continued insight and experience is appreciated as well. I’m impressed how you have turned your negatives into such positives.
March 19, 2008 at 10:38 am
PRISON: For anyone that would say Federal Prison is “Club Fed” – well they haven’t been there. It is Fed…there is no Club about it. You enter federal prison as a number and are basically nobody. Everyone is the same – there for committing a crime. It is interesting in that there are some who are in denial:
Somehow they were a victim. Somehow it shouldn’t have happened to them. Somehow the jury was wrong or the instructions weren’t fair.
To all of that – BULL!
In life things happen because of the choice we make. That is true and simple. Many do not wish to accept that simplicity because it requires personal accountability. To some – God forbid that they should ever be accountable for their actions – whether direct or indirect. We all suffer the consequences from choices in different ways. Not all will go to Federal Prison.
BACK TO PRISON: You are fed three times per day. You must work each day other than the weekend. When you work you are required to be paid. I earned 12 cents per hour for cleaning toilets and weed eating – simple tasks for someone with a masters degree in accounting. But then, I earned the right to do that by the choices I made.
Prison is no fun. It is best to accept accountability for ones actions. By the nature of those there – you can be “conned” while there, so making friends is not truly wise.
Prison is a place for serious introspection. You pray for your friends to write to you. You live to reconnect with former family and friends. Eventually, those who you were surrounded with need to move on – as their life continues and yours is stuck in a type of time warp.
Prison was the worst experience of my life and the best thing that could have ever happened to me. In prison I learned what it meant to be somebody – what it meant to be me in an honest way.
Prison allowed time for my personal growth and is something that I found benefit from, but then again, I went in expecting to grow somehow from the experience. I was not a victim – I was experiencing the consequences from my choices.
March 19, 2008 at 11:12 am
southern girl and mjcaa – you along with cynthia and bas and probably the same –
I know the facts and was there – but by your so called knowledge it is evident that you are jaded in your views – I find you laughable and sad – may you get what you so richly deserve and I am sure SME will – by the way – SME was the teacher and the others were willing students – think and post what you will but I have known SME all my life – and he is a sad person.
March 19, 2008 at 11:26 am
It appears to me that Mr Ewing was and is aware of the consequences. He came forward with the details of the scheme as did Mr May. He made the gut wrenching decision to go to trial.
We are all unaware of what was actually said in those meetings with the Feds unless we were present, but there is testimony in the form of a motion filed by the prosecution stating that Mr Ewing did in fact tell the truth to them.
Evidence shows that interviewees/witnesses were told to spill what they knew because Mr Ewing was NOT a target of this investigation over and over and over. Under the pretense of oral immunity the govt squeezed all the info from SME and May then turned around and used it against them. The govt even indicted them both on 2 counts of IRS taxes when both had left the company months prior as Trebert kept it going. The Judge did acquit SME on those counts.
It seems to me that the Govt should play by the same set of rules…set the standard for all of us.
March 19, 2008 at 11:53 am
MJCAA you must be gifted! (you will continue to read this)…..how do you know that JAD is not whom I think it is – and if you are close to the Ewings then you certainly did not know my brother – after he found out what was going on – he stayed as far away from that plague as he could – but the fallout from that was devastating. YOu really dont even make sense – my brother sent no one any where to do anything? Speak of what you know as fact – not from what the “Spouse or offspring” have told you.You dont know any of us. But think what you will – and keep on wearing that SAKS clothing and going to those SMU functions. Truly cost the govt a bunch. Enjoy .
March 19, 2008 at 11:55 am
southern girl – you need to read what Chuck is saying.
March 19, 2008 at 12:08 pm
FAM:
You know the facts and were there? It seems then that you could have been an unindicted coconspirator or were you given immunity? You too would have been found guilty of the conspiracy according to the jury instructions by the admission of knowing what you say you know. Were you an employee as well as your brothers? I honestly do not know that as fact because your brothers were only mentioned at trial. Robert clearly pointed his finger at his brother as well.
My facts are not jaded. Have you reviewed actual testimony?
Honestly, I am not interested in your responses and you clearly cannot accept any other opinions and facts to this case. And you certainly cannot add any reasonable discussion here on Mr Gallaghers blog. Your opinions are clearly jaded do to your hatred for the Ewing family and have no idea of the facts surrounding the entire case. You seem to think it all points to them only or that it is just about the Burroughs family. There are always 2 sides and yes they both deserved to be heard. This should not be the venue to discuss the Burroughs family inflamed opinions. Let’s stick to the testimony and facts into evidence and drop the name calling and excessive personal venting.
March 19, 2008 at 12:14 pm
I repeat southern girl read what Chuck has said – and my family was a victim.
Was yours? I know the facts, you are the speculator. If you dont like what is posted, that is your problem.
March 19, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Southern Girl brings me back to my initial point….. How is the govt allowed, legally, to follow a different set of rules… a different standard? Why can’t everyone play by the same rules…. even if the same decisions are reached in the end? Chuck talked about getting conned in prison. I’ve learned a lot in the very recent past about getting conned by the govt. And I don’t say that because I can’t face up to responsibilities, or because I wish things had been different, or because I’m in denial. I say that because SME was CONNED by our Fed. Govt. Actually, our Fed. Govt was burning that candle on both ends (and there are some who don’t realize that). Take the Ewing family out of the picture… What the Fed Govt did to build their case is so much bigger than this family’s involvement. They would like you to believe they are at the very center of SME’s conviction. You’ve read the comments here…. you know how easily/quickly they could be dispelled. Yes – it’s an extremely complicated case…. Not merely a case of innocent vs guilty, but a case of obtaining information improperly… and it being ALLOWED in court. The defense would not have been allowed to present evidence obtained in the same way (and, thankfully, the defense attorney had scrupples!). Why wasn’t/isn’t the govt prosecution held to the same standard? How is it that opposing sides participate in the same “game,” but play by different rules? Every trial I’ve participated in as a juror, the judge wrote the jury’s instructions for deliberation. Why was the prosecution allowed to write these? Is that a common action for prosecuting attorneys? Or is that a typical action for the prosecuting attorney when it’s the Fed. Govt??? I support the American govt. And I support the war against terrorism. I do NOT support the Fed. Govt. stepping into our American courtrooms and mucking up the process because they don’t have to play by the same rules as everyone else. If that IS legal, we all need to be paying closer attention.
March 19, 2008 at 12:38 pm
The evidence of this case is clear on this issue. That your family received and benefited monetarily. Many paychecks handed out over a long period of time. If you/they knew the facts then… consider yourself or your family conspirators. Now, can a conspirator also be a victim? Yes. Absolutely.
March 19, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Southern girl you certainly seem to have your “facTs’ confused to suit yourself.
Whatever. Why dont you just concentrate on something else besides my family?
March 19, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Which of my facts confuse you? What you are not understanding is that the govt allowed you access to minimal facts of evidence while interviewing all of you…. while investigating you or your brothers involvement. That is how they work. You have the right to be angry as do the other victims…to numerous to list, but also understand that your facts could be tainted and lean to one side because that is all the govt cared to share with you. Your personal feelings for SME and his family are not relevant to the evidence of law but the govt made damn sure they did to you.
March 19, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Chuck – Thanks for sharing this… and for your insights. You have my respect in your ability… and determination… to turn this all into something positive. Some of us will get there, I’m sure.
March 19, 2008 at 1:50 pm
POST PRISON:
For those who care…how does one recover. Simple – MAKE GOOD CHOICES.
I was told something profound when my crime was first uncovered – as I considered suicide – a wise man said to me, “You have made a terrible mistake – YOU ARE NOT A MISTAKE.” Don’t confuse the choice and the consequences that follow with who you are.
We are all much more than we seem.
I am a convicted felon by title. That title is meaningless! It only has meaning if we allow it to. I choose not to be concerned with that title. I am much more than the exterior cover as are all who post here.
If I could say something that would help all…it would be – look inward and ask yourself what you can do today to make things better for someone else.
Anger, bitterness, hurt, resentment, and other emotional expressions are only focusing on the past and past actions. Those are past, they cannot be changed, the only thing we can do is make good positive decisions today. Those decisions define the consequences for tomorrow and the results we elect to live in and with.
Today I am a Senior VP of Sales and Marketing with a public company. That is unheard of for a convicted felon, but then again, that title is meaningless to me and the company. They prefer me to produce results more than want to focus on my past.
Likewise, I don’t deny my past – am open about it – and know that the truth will set you free. Just like the new Governor of NY – he and his wife admitted that they both had a time of infidelity due to marital problems. They resolved it. They could have hid it, but had they made that choice their past would have been used against them. They elected to make it public – thereby there was nothing that could be used as an attack. I have done the same. I am open about my past choices and the consequences that followed.
To all…it would be wise to help SME as a human being – knowing that he is facing a life changing experience. He may have deserved it – so be it – but it doesn’t change the fact that it will be a challenge for he and his family.
Likewise, others who have been affected, perhaps it would serve you to look in the mirror and ask yourself (when no one else is there) what choices you made that contributed to such pain being reflected on this blog.
Lastly, if you feel yourself a victim, understand that all things happen for a reason. You can find good out of every situation if you want to. Your current choices will be the foundation for your future – hence you get to define your future.
I am open to questions…
March 19, 2008 at 1:54 pm
““You have made a terrible mistake – YOU ARE NOT A MISTAKE.” Don’t confuse the choice and the consequences that follow with who you are.”
Very wise indeed. Thank you.
March 19, 2008 at 2:10 pm
BAS – Hate to say it, but you need to read your own post. Move past the anger – look within and find out where it is coming from – and do something positive.
While I have felt a bit preechy with my comments, I must say – the power of our words and attitude will define our futures. I fear that some who have posted here and defining for themselves a future that is dismal. Until you get past the personal issues you have and try to find the good that can come from a bad situation, you’ll find yourselves stuck in the mud.
I am less than confident in your communication when you take such a negative attacking stance. I am considering whether to leave this or not. If I do it will be as an example of what not to do.
To FAM – let me suggest you take the high road on this one. There is no point to doing anything this does not make the situation better. And responding to BAS post is not moving anyone forward.
March 19, 2008 at 2:37 pm
To both BAS and FAM…I will only allow comments that are productive in either healing or helping people understand the process of white collar crime – choice and consequences. Hence you two earlier posts have been removed.
March 19, 2008 at 3:21 pm
This would be something that will hopefully be productive in the healing process of a small part of the victims – my family. I am wondering you any of you have had any personal experience in this – your family has been victimized – now dont jump on me and spout off about checks, homes, jobs and the rest of the untrue things – I want to know if you have had any PERSONAL experience – not some standard mouthings –
and I want ask only for comments from those of you whom have been victimized (yes my family was – although most of you seem to want to class us as the ones on trial)
and have had a family member pass away the next day – one that was a direct victim –
DONT tell lme what you think he did on the stand or what you seem to think he received – just personal advice about this – victimized and death – any body have any words of wisdom from PERSONAL experience – I would like to hear them if you do – but only if you do.
March 19, 2008 at 4:14 pm
What caused the death of your brother? Was being victimized and his death directly related to each other… than the difficulty of bad timing? He did look extremely ill while giving his testimony. Do you hold any animosity against the govt for forcing him to testify while he was obviously ill?
If I failed to mention..I am sorry for your loss and good luck moving onward in a more positive direction. We have all suffered in our lives, some more than their fair share and dealing with our emotions can be such a challenge all by its self. Time takes care of a lot of issues and be there for your brothers daughter who needs her family now.
March 19, 2008 at 4:37 pm
FAM – I know you are asking others and am open to productive comments.
Allow me to make a comment. THERE ARE NO VICTIMS.
I know that will not be well received by many, but everything happens for a reason. We are a product of our choices. Everyone makes choices. Please accept the fact that I honestly know nothing about your circumstances re: houses, checks etc. AND could care less. But let me speak from my experience.
My ex-wife (lovely lady – great mother – and friend today) wanted to be a victim. She was, in her mind, a victim on my theft. Yet, she enjoyed the money when there was a free flow of it. She would buy something, tell me that we needed to put money in the account to cover the expense, and enjoyed the ability for that to happen. What she didn’t know was that I was stealing money to fund the lifestyle.
When she found out her husband was a liar and a thief – she was hurt and a VICTIM. Was she? Wouldn’t it make sense that a spouse would know the families finances? Wouldn’t it raise a question as to where the easy flow of money came from? The fact is I was the LIAR and THIEF and I paid the direct price.
She was unaware, but certainly not a victim. She enjoyed the fruits of ill gotten gains – the status – the position.
A victim is kid who while sitting at a piano gets shot by a drive by shooting.
We all are products of the choices we make. If you feel that somehow you’ve become a victim then you have yet to look in the mirror and accept responsibility for your actions that have contributed to the place you are in today.
When you accept accountability and responsibility for your part in where ever you are today – you will come to peace with yourself and others. You’ll find that peace and positive results follow the elimination of the blame game.
I hope that those who are following this thread will get – when you are ready to receive it – the message – YOU ARE MORE THAN YOU SEEM. When you begin to focus on helping others heal – you will heal yourself. Move past VICTIM to VICTOR! It can be done, but not until you are ready to accept your role in the process. And just in case you think you have no role- you are fooled by one of life’s illusions.
March 19, 2008 at 5:17 pm
Mr. Gallagher, how can you say that there are NO victims? I am sorry, perhaps your line of thinking is different than mine, but SME used his own family members for his own personal gain. His family members did NOT benefit as richly as some individuals on this web log seem to think. He had people impersonate his sister and nephew! He did rotten things with his own 93(?)-year-old mothers identity! Are you saying that these people aren’t victims? Please, elaborate.
March 19, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Victimhood is a state of mind. It is fostered by the notion that someone has done something wrong to you and you had no responsibility. Again, I can’t speak for the family involved, but why would another family member take money from another? Are you not responsible for yourself? It was not SME’s job to enrich others. I believe that we all are responsible for our station in life and must take responsibility for it.
Here’s an example. I found out three years ago I had prostate cancer. Was I a victim? I don’t think so, perhaps it was genetic, perhaps my diet of red meat contributed, perhaps my overuse of Sweet-n-low – who knows. Reality was I had prostate cancer. The question was – what would I do about it? I made choices – took responsibility – and am cancer free today. I still make choices related to my health – as I went today for a screening for possible recurrence of cancer. So far so good.
Now I could claim that I was a victim of that disease, or I could accept responsibility that I was facing something I didn’t expect, but that my choices would define my future.
Looking back and claiming that I was a poor innocent victim is easy. It is harder to look at yourself and ask – could I have done ANYTHING that could have made the situation any better today? My guess is – if you’re honest with yourself – you’ll find something that you could have done differently that would make today a little better for you and someone else.
March 19, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Is it also possible that they USED HIM for their personal gain? They could have refused his financial assistance years ago. If today the money was still flowing their direction, they would still be taking. One thing about SME, he was… and still is… a giver… and enjoyed taking care of many many families even when it was abused and never appreciated.
March 19, 2008 at 7:06 pm
southern girl. that is exactly what chuck is saying. this has been an interesting thread today. offering the evidence and testimony has shed a lot of light.
i totally agree with your comment SG about Steve being a giver. not only is he generous with what some would say is meaningless posessions, he is generous with his heart and always had the residents first and foremost in his sights!
March 19, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Here’s an interesting question – what could SME have done different to bring about an outcome that would have insured his freedom?
In my case, that would be easy…if I had done what I knew to be right, I would not have taken money from clients. I knew better, but was overcome with temptation.
For those who wish to answer – avoid judgements just look inward and ask what could he have done and maybe better still – what could YOU have done to bring about a more positive outcome for SME and all concerned?
March 19, 2008 at 10:12 pm
But SME is a good con artist – a good teller of stories – if any of you people really knew the entire story you would not be so quick to make us out to be the bad guys. And southern girl, what makes you know what would happen – perhaps you need to reconsider you statements before posting -Yes he had people IMPERSONATE my mother and my brother, and yes he had done horrendous things with my grandmother’s identity. You can not begin to know, or understand what SME is capable – he was the teacher- as previously stated – he had been under scrunity and gotten in trouble for this before – please keep your focus on the convicted and leave the victims – and yes
chuck – there are victims – you are entitled to your own opinion but it is not the word of GOD – My family, especially my deceased brother, and my mother – were victimized
along with my grandmother. What type of person has someone else impersonate their own family?
March 19, 2008 at 10:15 pm
ALso, the cause of death of my brother is a private thing and will not be discussed.
March 19, 2008 at 10:58 pm
What an interesting day. Many interesting posts. Many opinions. FAM is right – certainly my opinions are only opinions and I am not the keeper of the word of GOD.
However, can’t resist one last point regarding being a victim. In order to be a victim one has to be involved. For example, if someone’s identity had been taken, then they had to do something to allow that to happen. Now before you jump to conclusions and say “no!” let me explain.
I wrote a blog earlier today about a man who was sentenced to prison for identity theft. He used software that others had on their computers to steal the identity of his “VICTIMS.” Yes…I used that word.
However, I contend they weren’t victims. They made the choice to have the software on their computers that opened the door to his crime. Did they ask for the crime? No. But they enabled the crime and by doing so, that’s where the victimhood stopped.
So I go back to my earlier question – what could have been done to stop SME or certainly not allow him to use others that now causes pain? If grandmother’s identity had been stolen (keep in mind I don’t know grandmother and am not using her name in any negative way) how did SME get the identifying data to do that? Is it possible that Grandmother trusted SME and SME abused that trust? IF yes…then Grandmother didn’t protect herself and therefore, by definition is not a victim as she (I’m guessing here) made the data available to be stolen.
Now…I’ll readily admit I may be way off base, but for arguments sake – say I’m partially right – trust was abused and SME took advantage. IF that’s somewhat the case, then you can’t be a victim because you contributed to the problem in the first place.
As I quit writing tonight – let me say, you begin to heal when you look in the mirror and understand that this just didn’t happen. It took many players to get to where you are today. Each person played a part. And, healing can only begin in earnest when we face the part we played – accept personal responsibility – and make better choices.
Have a good evening everyone! Chuck
March 20, 2008 at 7:44 am
Sorry – Hope I didn’t cause any more problems for anyone here. I got so frustrated with wanting to hear from someone else on this blog…. And everytime anyone sneezed, FAM is all over them. This is my first experience with a blog… And probably my last. But I didn’t realize how its moderation could be overtaken by such a negative and vile participant. Their presentation is wicked and hateful… Attacking anyone who even thinks about joining this conversation. I am not struck by “who is right and who is wrong.” I am struck by the total consumption of “victimization.”
VICTIM – On this I totally agree with Chuck. You can be the victim of a rape, but you don’t have to live your life as a victim. We are all victims of something… Big… Small… everyday of this world…. And some days are worse than others. Some of us have filefolders in our brains that are labeled “Bad Things That Have Happened to Me.” Others of us have a big file folder labeled VICTIM, into which we manage to file just about everything. Some people give recognition to negative events in their lives, but file them away and move on. Others keep building the case that everything that happens to them supports their role as a victim. It’s all in how you choose to handle these “events” and file them away. Personally, I believe that when you admit you are a victim, you are admitting weakness…. Weakness in your ability to make the necessary changes within your own life so you are NOT a victim. Being a victim is a very negative thing. It is not what life has dumped on you; it’s what you’ve allowed to happen to you.
I’ve been a victim of this blog ever since certain participants became involved in it. But you know what…. I don’t have to continue to be a victim. Hatefullness is not my personality (normally….). In this situation, the “fix” is ease… I can walk away. It’s the simple recognition of the power I process over ME. Recognizing that as I feel more and more victimized, I lash out. I don’t like that response from me…neither do I like feeling victimized. So I can take ownership of both my actions AND of the responsibility to do something about it. By further participation in this blog, I become an enabler of this kind of hate-filled communication….. I continue to set myself up to be victimized by its tone…. And I run the risk of saying something inappropriate. Because I want to avoid the risk, I remove myself from the threat… And this communication.
But I do hope others will find the opportunity… And the nerve… To participate despite the tone. I do know your insights are desired (and needed!) by some people on this blog.
March 20, 2008 at 8:44 am
Clearly, BAS you do not see my postings clearly. That is your choice. None of my family intends to “live our life” as victims, I am only speaking that we were victims.
Much more so than the majority of you here know, or chose to know – I feel as though
the focus here is way off – remember who was on trial – no my family in any sense of the word, although most of you here have tried to do that. You people have no idea of what SME has done leading up to this – it just did not happen over night. Countless years of things with him (and now dont jump me and say if I knew I was as guitly as he – I did what needed to be don) He DID NOT provide the things some of you are saying and we certainly are not how most of you have tried to depict us. We are all
gainfully employed respectable people. We dont shop at SAKS and certainly dont drive
those fancy cars – or take trips abroad impersonating others. I really dont understand why you people seem to just skim over this – he did this to us – we had no idea he was doing this – how would you feel if someone had done this to you and your family – and then we have such a tragedy on top of it? I am so glad that my brother got to speak – and please dont start on that – he did speak his speak – and believe me – if needed there were many more waiting to testify – my family is the most important thing to me.
My mother is crushed as are we all. No one should have to bury a child. And unless you have PERSONAL experience with this do not advise. Not unless you have walked in my shoes. You people were only exposed to a fraction of what happened in that 5 year period – and only what was needed was brought to light. There were many more years of this before and yes he was being watched for a long time before he ever went to them. Why didnt he plea ? Dont know – no one cares about “telling your story” in something like this – and this is the exact thing he told me the night I spoke with him before the trial started – only the facts are what counts here. It is a shame that this has happened to all – no we wont live our lives as victims – I have never stated or insinuated that in any way – but you are all so quick to jump on me – clearly you have jaded views or are not as well informed as what you think. ONlY one here has the true picture and I applaud them for speaking up. If SME ever moves from the physic ward to the general population, perhaps he will have some sort of life – and go on. But my family’s loss is forever, and I pray that my brother rests in peace knowing that he finally got to speak.
March 20, 2008 at 9:05 am
I do encourage all to participate. Blogging is different. Keep in mind the power of the words you speak or write – as the case may be. There is healing in writing and expressing yourself.
I am still curious as to what SME could have done different to have avoided this unfortunate outcome?
What could any of you – as posters on this blog – have done to bring about a different outcome as well.
Thus far I sense a lot of people holding on “for dear life” to their plight and few having the courage to state what they could have done to make a more positive difference.
March 20, 2008 at 10:48 am
FAM,
Again, Why is it that you cannot discuss what was actually brought into evidence during the trial? What you are offering is hearsay. You said in a prior post that you were in attendance.
It just doesn’t match up to what you are claiming. From the witness stand under oath, your brother Robert Burroughs ADMITTED giving his personal information to his brother with permission and was then faxed while in his presence spring 2003. That SME offered him an apartment in the DFW area where he could work and raise his daughter. Dec 2003 (6 months after) SME then LEFT the companies to report what had been happening to the authorities. Your brothers signature was abused during that year and many people have admitted signing or stamping his name. Testimony by many employees of Gary Trebert’s own law firm stated there were many stamps in THEIR possession. Now, there was testimony where 3 people claim to have met Mr Burroughs. Wasn’t that actually your other brother Blake who had been employed with the accounting dept of the companies? There is evidence of an office for the Burroughs brothers in IL. during that time. The only person who went to Austria was Larry May. Are you saying that he impersonated your sister? It was testimony that the abuse of authority continued AFTER SME was cooperating with the govt. Many months into 2004. The Judge did, as I stated earlier ACQUIT SME on those charges because he was not present or involved in company activities during that time. If you were not there as I suspect, why don’t you spend the $3,000.00 and read the transcript.
I know a lot about you and your family but choose to stay respectful and discuss the facts into evidence at trial. Continuing to be hateful and vindictive in your statements about SME and his wife only make YOU look victimized to only YOURSELF. Not in the best interest of your family you clearly care so much for as everyone moves forward. It’s so obvious to everyone involved in this tragic saga that the govt did not share everything with you or your brothers failed to tell you.
But as important as you feel in this case and how badly you feel victimized, the Burroughs family played a small role and what you do not know. Or how SME reported the abuse of authority with regard to his nephew and sister. Many transactions that occured with these companies were out of his control. Try fighting an entire law firm of shady attorneys who were coconspirators, unindicted or given immunity. You have no idea the price that is actually being paid with regard to your family.
What is very sad is that you not only lost a brother you also lost an uncle and your sister lost her son and her brother. Also, how thoughtful and compassionate of you to speak with SME during or just before the trial. No doubt you expressed your concern for what has clearly been a difficult time for him.
March 20, 2008 at 11:56 am
Southern girl, you KNOW nothing about my family. And you really arent reading what I have said. I said, after you inquired, that my brothers cause of death was private and not up for discussion. Read again your last paragraph – if you really knew anything at all about my family that piece of your post makes no sense at all. You clearly have a jaded view of things. I am as free as you are to express – you dont know the facts and you are clearly trying to make SME the saint – just remember who went to trial and who is now in the physic ward. Not but a fact. You really dont understand, and know nothing about my family. I think it best for you to just comment on what Chuck has said and quit trying to bring it around to trying to make SME the victimized and innocent one.
You are clearly confused. As stated by another poster, SME had members of his own family IMPERSONATED, and did horrendous things with his own mother’s identity.
You really are grasping here and dont know the truth. I have said nothing about anyone that is not a fact, like it or not. There is much much more to this than what you are spouting. YOu fancy yourself an expert when clearly you dont know what you are talking about.
March 20, 2008 at 11:57 am
Again…
“What is very sad is that you not only lost a brother you also lost an uncle and your sister lost her son and her brother. Also, how thoughtful and compassionate of you to speak with SME during or just before the trial. No doubt you expressed your concern for what has clearly been a difficult time for him.”
“sister” should read MOTHER.
March 20, 2008 at 12:02 pm
and lets see I believe Chuck was stating some things about his ex-spouse – why hasnt that been dealt with here – dont you feel that she (the spouse) was enjoying all of the free flowing money – didnt she have a certain amount of responsibility here?
March 20, 2008 at 12:18 pm
By the way , mentioning the quarter of a million that was spent at SAKs is not vindictive it is a fact – as are the extravagant vacations and vehicles. It is a fact that he did horrible things with his own mothers identity – much of I am sure was not revealed – as well as having others impersonated. Perhaps you feel Larry May was the only one that went to Austria – maybe the only one of the trio – but he was not unaccompanied. There is much you dont know – and much you clearly dont understand. You can go on thinking what ever you like. People like you are much like small insects that we occasionally flick away – a small nusiance but no impact.
Good luck to you.
March 20, 2008 at 12:26 pm
INTERESTING – “People like you are much like small insects that we occasionally flick away – a small nusiance but no impact.” WOW…that statement is telling and does not promote healing. Wonder if there is willingness to move past VICTIM and move toward healing for all concerned.
People are more than insects that get flicked away. Everyone here has something to gain by accepting responsibility and making the right choices.
March 20, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Maybe she was or maybe she wasn’t. There was no testimony as who actually spent money. Chuck’s crime is different in many respects. SME was not indicted for theft. Govt witnesses did state that regardless of the salaries of the 3 men indicted, there was not the money to pay the 941’s. If they had put back ALL salaries taken out there still would NOT have been the money necessary to operate at a profit.
March 20, 2008 at 12:38 pm
DId not say he was indicted for theft – but with such free flowing money – wouldnt one wonder where it came from – do you seriously think the money they spend came from their actual salaries – get real – and chuck I am sure that “southern girl” totally understands what the insect reference meant. I have no “ties” in any respect to this person;
March 20, 2008 at 12:47 pm
I did find this interesting…
It was actually evidence in court that $250,000 was spent at SAKS, Neimans, Dillards, Walmart, Target, Home Depot, Lowes, Sams and The Container Store over 5 yrs time …the govt stated all of those stores were LUXURY dept stores. Target would certainly be glad to hear that coming from their Government.
March 20, 2008 at 1:45 pm
I just read these posting this morning, and have decided to make a few comments and questions.
First, I have not lost a child, but I have lost a father. So I am deeply sorry for the Ewing family and his children.
Second, my question is directed at Southern Girl and FAM. Since SG seems to bringing up important fact about the case and FAM claims to have been there, then could FAM please explain why Mr. Burroughs gave Mr. Ewing his personal information? Why wouldn’t he have protected himself? Especially since you claim Mr. Ewing was a corrupt and conniving man. Also, Mr. Burroughs reportedly received money from Mr. Ewing (which was also apparently stated as fact in the trial) then what did he think it was for, or was he the only one that believed Mr. Ewing was a helping kind of guy? There seems to be contradictions going back and forth. And while I deeply sympathize for the loss of your family FAM, you don’t seem to be answering any of the comments that were made in the trial. If you do not have any responses to the allocations then it would be only logical that you don’t really know and maybe are just looking for a way to vent some anger. I can see trying to defend your diseased brother, but in your mind do you think it was possible he was in on it, or just gave his name out freely for some extra money?
Thirdly, this question is for Mr. Gallegher, in your case did you find the prosecution (the govt) as manipulative and deceitful? I have heard and witnessed some horrifying things committed by the government who feels free to yield their power how they see fit. Since this case has so many people who have received immunity or are otherwise coconspirators, is this not the government’s job at making treats to trap on or more persons? I find it ridiculously unfair for Mr. Ewing that so many people teamed up against Mr. Ewing to save themselves from prosecution. How is this anyway fair to Mr. Ewing’s case? Wouldn’t these people say anything that the government tells them to say?
I hope you don’t find my questions and comments to intrusive, but I curious what happened in the court room.
March 20, 2008 at 4:23 pm
In response to the question directed at GALLAGHER – no I did not find the government manipulative and deceitful. I did not give them that right or pleasure. When you admit guilt and hide nothing you leave the government with a win and with all due respect that’s what they want.
People seem to forget that the governments job is to win a conviction. We are a country built on laws and individual compliance. The only practical way to get people to elect to comply with the law is to make examples of those who do not. Since the two plead guilty that only left one other big fish to fry – sorry for the words – SME. It makes perfect sense that the government would use what ever means necessary to get the win. They, naturally, would be willing to let smaller fish off the hook in order to catch the big one.
In my case, I let them catch me. I made a CHOICE and every choice has a consequence. Part of the reason I have been able to recover is due to the choices I made to accept total personal responsibility.
March 21, 2008 at 8:06 am
JJD$U -I do find your comments totally intrusive – and was never here to even pretend to answer any comments related to the trial.
March 21, 2008 at 9:51 am
In order for a white collar fraud to be committed there are three components:
NEED: As an example, in my case back in 1986 I was behind in my house payments – therefore, I “needed” the money to make the payments hence NEED!
OPPORTUNITY: In order to take money or commit a fraud, one has to have some method of doing the illegal act. Again, in my case as trustee of a trust, I had the “opportunity” to take money to meet the “need.”
RATIONALIZATION: Honest people don’t want to think themselves as liars and thieves. Therefore, one needs a way to rationalize his or her behavior in order to justify the fraud. In my case, I composed a note from myself to the trust in order to RATIONALIZE that I was borrowing the money instead of stealing.
QUESTION: What was SME’s need? What was his opportunity to create the fraud? What was SME’s rationalization?
Just curious from those who know or have different perspectives. One is not found guilty without have some element of those three components.
March 21, 2008 at 10:14 am
My apologies FAM. Let me be clear, I thought you were willing because of your repeated responses and questions on this blog about what crimes Mr. Ewing committed. Apparently you know the facts, so logically I thought, who better to ask these questions too? But hey, sometimes I am wrong.
Mr. Gallagher, thank you for being so willing to talk about your personal life with all of us, without personal attacks. I do believe that bloging and open discussion is a source of healing. I do however feel that FAM has had such a negative impact in this blog and only is trying to make things worse in this difficult process. FAM’s facts in this case are clearly misconstrued and slanted. Therefor to make any further progress in understanding the facts of this case I would urge you as the moderator to restrict FAM from any further blogs.
Thank you for allowing this blog to help others move forward and educate themselves in white collar crimes.
FAM: I prey God works a miracle for you and grants you the power of forgiveness. It’s tough, but you will be able to move forward and live life with it. ~God bless!
March 21, 2008 at 10:33 am
It seems to me that SME and Mr May whether they agreed to or not, contributed to the fraud and conspiracy because they followed what was clearly bad advice from an attorney. In this case that would be Gary Trebert, Ms. Vance and an entire law firm. When SME finally realized that 941’s were not or even trying to be paid he admitted his concerns. Does that still make him guilty of the fraud and conspiracy? Yes.
March 21, 2008 at 11:50 am
Mr Gallagher, Are there terms of service posted on your site? If so, I cannot locate them.
JJ, Hopefully FAM’s further comments will be more factually responsible as they continue deal with their grief. Maybe someone needs to point them in the direction to another site that will provide additional advice dealing with grief and feelings of being victimized.
BAS, Thank you for initially getting this discussion started within the comments here on Mr Gallaghers blog. You have raised issues that people in the country need to be aware of with regard to our govt. They will use anything we say against us. Your apology was very eloquent by the way, and hope that in the future I get the opportunity to read more of your insights and to be able to discuss that with dignity and intelligence.
Happy Easter everyone and GOD bless.
March 21, 2008 at 12:24 pm
Southern Girl – sorry to be ignorant, but I don’t know what you mean when you say “terms of service.” If you visit my web site: http://www.chuckgallagher.com you will see at the bottom of my home page my “Privacy Statement” and “Terms of Use.” However, this is a blog on the wordpress site and hence would be governed by whatever “Terms of Use” they have.
If you have a question specifically feel free to e-mail me at chuck@chuckgallagher.com
CG
March 21, 2008 at 1:21 pm
JJ you may get me banned -but several postings ago, chuck posted that if we personally
harmed, etc – am not sure of correct wording – that the post was welcomed. Perhaps what some of you are not privy to is that due to SME dealing with others identifies there have been all sort of civils suits against them personally from drug companies – etch where their names were signed and personal information used. Not to mention bank accounts opened homes purchased, etc while members of my family were being IMPERSONATED.
So yes I feel we were harmed. I am not an attorney and dont pretend to be but that is not right and obviously a jury of SME’s person thougth so as well – perhaps some you dont know quite as much as you think you do – but this investigation is much more than what was presented and much more deeply rooted than what you observers will ever know.
March 21, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Please overlook – some of my wording was incorrect – i meant dealing with other identities
and I meant a jury of SME’s peers. THere is always so much more than meets the eye
or what is heard. Only the surface was skimmed,what was needed to put him where he should be.
March 21, 2008 at 1:29 pm
I do think I can answer a bit of what SME’s need was – and no we never asked him for any money – there is alot there from a lifetime of his troubles and owing his own parents money but you are not going to bait me into disclosing such things – Chuck -asked about needs – i guess he thought his family NEEDED clothing from Saks, i suppose it takes an expensive wardrobe to impress sororities. He needed expensive pets – takes alot to feed a bull mastiff. To run around and to fit into Dallas’s “high society” as one might put it,
it takes alot of money. That is a fact. As I have stated before I feel as though this was
very much about keeping people in a lifestyle they felt they had to have. As I have stated before, I am sorry he had to pay twice – once with money belong to the US govt and the rest with more than likely the rest of his life.
March 21, 2008 at 1:45 pm
FAM, Are you aware of the other evidence into testimony, that others contributed to your brothers’ involvement?
March 21, 2008 at 1:48 pm
I am well aware of what went on – what was evidence and what was not brought up.
March 21, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Then why are you not willing to admit guilt by others?? There are sooo many admitting guilt. Mr Head, the CFO’s testimony was interesting. What did you think about what he testified to concerning Robert Burroughs and your mothers involvement? I’m very interested in whether or not YOU thought he was being honest.
March 21, 2008 at 2:05 pm
what are you speaking of in particular?
March 21, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Also, I do not think it was any one else on trial or convicted -I do believe it was only Stephen Michael Ewing on trial. Others testified, etc., but I dont think anyone else was on trial or convicted that day – and I do feel as though some of you are trying to bait me into disclosing personal information and I will not do that. My brother Brent obviously can not speak any more so he can not respond, and I think out of respect for the dead, one should take that into consideration. People need to remember that life is so much more that you might be seeing or hearing. It is oh so easy for you all to jump on the bandwagon and label my family various things, but truly, dont you think that with such free flowing money, that the spouse or the offspring ( I will not say children they are both of age and have their own issues} might have wondered where all of this money was coming for trips to England, Vegas, Hawaii, Paris, Austria, and all that expensive clothing – multiple cars – expensive house, lengthy college educations that the best schools – I think that most people want the best for their family – but they lived the lifestyle of the Trumps.
March 21, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Everything in his testimony while under oath specifically…. about Robert Burroughs, Blake Burroughs and Mrs Burroughs…
I felt as though the prosecution was struggling with him, getting him to say things that he may or may not have known. Then cross examination about his statements to the FBI specifically about the Burroughs family. This had to have made a huge impressionon you. Just looking for your thoughts.
March 21, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Believe me when I say my family had no idea what was going on – what had been done with identities until we were contacted by outside sources. Signatures were forged many times, peoples were impersonated, I am sure SME laid awake at night devising his plans. He was
intelligent to a degree, (and what shame he did not complete his education and get a real job) but to send some to Europe to mail a form with out a check – he spend some time with that one – totally different MO than what had been done before. I am would like to see who it is was that impersonated my mother. Maybe Larry May knows.
March 21, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Why would you care about their lifestyle? It appears that while your brothers, mother and grandmother benefited from SME’s money (clear testimony) maybe you were left out? I can certainly review the transcript and evidence list and give you the exact dollar amount that went to your family, mortgage payments, furniture, utility bills, doctor bills, credit card payoffs, big screen tv’s , computers, fax machines, and auto repairs. It’s all there. There’s more if interested. Seems they/you led a lifestyle that others would consider as comfortable. any chance of repaying that back to the govt or to taxpayers for accepting this money and paychecks where fraud and conspiracy has been committed?
March 21, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Please answer my question about Mr Heads testimony.
March 21, 2008 at 2:47 pm
And your family members were contacted by the outside sources because SME provided them with your addresses, names and other info to contact them. Your mother agreed with her brother providing that info in advance. The govts evidence in a motion stated that. The transcript and notes are very interesting…you should read them to refresh your own memory or facts.
March 21, 2008 at 3:43 pm
SG- you bring up an interesting point. I know the 3 men may/will have restitution to pay back but, I wonder what happens to other family members ie. The Burroughs family and Treberts inlaws who accepted and benefited because many gifts and monies. No doubt in my mind that the IRS is seriously looking there for restitution as well. Can anyone else smell IRS audits??? Or maybe it will be overlooked for becoming govt witnesses? Yikes. Could get messy for a lot of folks.
March 21, 2008 at 3:56 pm
JAD,
Could get messy indeed. Hope they got something from the govt in writing because we have clearly learned from this not to trust the prosecution at their word.
March 21, 2008 at 4:24 pm
As I said, you are clearly and sadly misinformed if you think I or any of my family (outside of Texas) led any type of lifestyle any one would consider more than above poverty level, regardless of what may be in evidence, you apparently dont realize that we did not want or realize anything like that. There was fraud, forgery and impersonation going on here.
And what do I care about the ones in Dallas Trump like lifestyle – we should all care plenty – due to the obvious. And while we are at it – JAD mentioned the Burroughs and Trebert family – what about the spouses family – the spouses family – alot went on there.
March 21, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Hello everyone! I have been monitoring this blog for several days now, and have read over all the comments and would like to share some of my thoughts. First of all, it is pretty obvious that FAM did not attend the trial, possibly not even one day. I could be wrong though. Maybe I am completely wrong, but it seems to me that she hasn’t stated any concrete facts that came out at trial, only the information that was in the newspaper, which I too read. FAM also claims that she spoke to Stephen Michael Ewing several times throughout the trial. Did you vent all of your anger towards Mr. Ewing when you two corresponded with each other? Were you supportive of him or his family?
FAM obviously senses a tremendous amount of jealousy with all of the purchased clothes from Saks 5th Avenue. This just floors me. I surely dont do my shopping at Saks, but FAM brings it up in almost all of her comments. You should do some serious shopping at Saks FAM to feel wealthy, maybe even get a little revenge. You can come back and say hey guys, I just shopped at Saks 5th Avenue, thats where Stephen Ewing did his shopping. So Stephen Ewing purchased a ridiculous amount of clothes from Saks 5th Avenue? Does that amount to criminal activity? FAM obviously believes it does, so it must. Other than claiming that people were impersonating FAM’s family in Austria (which never came out in trial), FAM doesn’t state any concrete evidence of her actually being victimized. FAM’s brother Robert Burroughs received a $1,000 company check in the mail every month for a year. and cashed it every month. Mr. Burroughs made it plainly clear on the stand that he had no clue whatsoever what Mr. Ewing was doing with his name; he just gladly took the money. Thinking back about Mr. Burroughs, Robert Burroughs looked like he was extremely ill when he testified against Stephen Ewing. This must have been a difficult time for him up there on the stand, due to the fact that his testimony under oath seemed to contradict what he told the FBI when he was interviewed back in Illinois. So FAM, why do you believe your brother Robert Burroughs didnt feel as though he needed to tell the truth about what happened? Do you think the govt got to him and gave him immunity? Why did Robert Burroughs act like he didnt know what was transpiring when at the time he benefited greatly from the company? It just doesnt make any sense to me why he lied so blatantly.
These three men and many other co-conspirators who were granted immunity are all guilty parties. What they did was completely reprehensible, there is no doubt about that. I thank Mr. Gallagher for supplying the public a forum to discuss white collar crimes and their consequences. Mr. Gallagher should be commended!
March 21, 2008 at 4:28 pm
And Jim, if you think you are going to stir up anything, I know you yourself were in the witness room -so………..to testify against him,
March 21, 2008 at 4:37 pm
You all keep trying to stir things up against just the Burroughs family – while not mention
the Treberts and how about the things pertaining the the spouses family – you dont want to do that because you SAY you are close to them – well – what is fair one is fair for all.
and all the while you continue to skip over the one who wanted his story told – the one whom all of his life lived it like he was above the “rules” until it finally put it where he needed to be for years.
March 21, 2008 at 4:43 pm
FAM, Then you are saying that our govt gave false evidence that The Burroughs’ received such things and money? Your brother…. while on the witness stand….under oath… identified his endorsements on checks. The govt had their own forensic CPA’s do the math and compile the totals. I’m stating fact into evidence at trial.
I’m so interesting in your version of Mr Heads testimony…
March 21, 2008 at 4:48 pm
I did not say that at all. You are trying to bait me and you will not do it. I stated that we did not realize the lifestyle, etc that you think we did. another posted commented the same way = I would have to know what evidence you are specifically speaking of and see something legal to comment. Do not put words in my mouth. I did not say there was false evidence, what specifically are you speaking of? YOu mentioned big screen tvs, utility bills, credit cards, etc? what?
March 21, 2008 at 4:49 pm
and lets now forget, while there may be been testimony from my brother, there was forgery and impersonation – you cant seem to grasp that i guess
March 21, 2008 at 5:03 pm
No one here is denying the guilty except you. Unless you can back up any testimony concerning the spouses family then I suggest what you have to say is hearsay. Are you claiming they were employees like you or your other family members were?
Please FAM tell us about Mr Heads testimony in the courtroom….
As a caring family member as yourself, you had to have been concerned. I figure you would be full of interesting insight to his statements. Some of which confused me.
March 21, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Clearly there was forgery. By a lot of people. The money and gifts to family that was listed individually on pages of pages of evidence. Again I think there was a lot being received in Il. monetarily that you were not privy to. They obviously left you out of that loop. Which may be a good thing as you won’t have to explain it on your taxes. I’m not putting words into your mouth…you were in the courtroom and heard/read it for yourself.
That evidence had to have been compelling to you though. It adds up to pretty big numbers and again over a 5 yr period.
March 21, 2008 at 7:00 pm
Hey Doug and welcome. Thanks for the insight from another person who attended the trial. I was not there, nor was I a witness. But you may be wrong about FAM attending the trial cause she says she was there and claims to knows it all. If she wasn’t there as you claim then they (FAM) are being cautious about what they know for fear of govt retaliation. She’s sticking to her victim story. As she should.
I’m interested in Heads testimony though. Please FAM respond so I get that part of it. Must be juicy.
Now let’s get serious How sad, for so many good people that have been affected by what others have done. I too respectively question Mr Gallaghers opinion that there are no victims (at least here) There were persons totally innocent of any crime that were affected, have suffered tremendously if nothing more than their reputation. Come on man, a human being died here. His daughter is a victim in my eyes. We have all witnessed what not to do. That we can all agree on.
March 21, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Doug, we need to be careful with what we say is fact or testimony coming from the trial. Your statement…
“FAM’s brother Robert Burroughs received a $1,000 company check in the mail every month for a year. and cashed it every month. Mr. Burroughs made it plainly clear on the stand that he had no clue whatsoever what Mr. Ewing was doing with his name; he just gladly took the money.”
I don’t recall him saying that he didn’t know what Ewing was doing with his name. He said he didn’t know and couldn’t remember. Then he mentioned his other brother, that he signed his name, provided his SS# for his brother to fax to someone. He wasn’t sure where the fax was going.
March 21, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Let me correct myself…he said he couldn’t remember what was being done with his name and personal info when defense counsel asked him. He was stumbling with his words at that point and very nervous then his memory was a little refreshed after hearing what the FBI’s notes said. Signing his name using big loops so he would know it was his. I wonder what that was about?
March 21, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Southern Girl states: “I too respectively question Mr Gallaghers opinion that there are no victims (at least here) There were persons totally innocent of any crime that were affected, have suffered tremendously if nothing more than their reputation.”
I respect that! I have a question however, of the people who have posted here and have some knowledge of the situation – who was totally innocent – had NO knowledge – received no personal gain – and suffered?
If, for example, I was a nurse that worked at the nursing home (of course all know I was not), had taxes taken from my pay – which were not paid to the IRS and the IRS made me pay the (un-remitted) tax a second time – then I would agree that person would be a victim.
However, I have yet to hear of anyone who (1) knew absolutely nothing; (2) received no financial gain in any way; (3) suffered a tangible loss and (4) has stepped forward to acknowledge those facts here.
I do hear people claiming VICTIMHOOD which is the easiest way to avoid any personal accountability for your part in the drama.
Now let me be clear – you didn’t have to commit the crime in order to have played a part in the overall drama. And, if, in any way, you played a part, then you can’t be a VICTIM. Pardon my lack of facts, but someone above said that someone accepted a check each month. They didn’t perhaps know what it was for, but accepted it. Whomever that person is or was is no victim. That person played a role in the overall drama and any role takes away a valid claim of VICTIM.
From personal experience, one can be a VICTIM as long as one wants and that cycle of thinking and feeling will keep you stuck there. When you open your eyes to the fact one day that perhaps you had or played some small part in the drama – you then begin to move past “the past” and make positive choices for the future.
Just some thoughts…and as one said, I am not God…
March 21, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Mr Gallagher, Thank you for your response and I do agree with you. But that comment did not come from me.
It was JAD from their 7pm comment.
March 21, 2008 at 8:23 pm
OOPS…
Well that does prove it…I am not God as God makes no mistakes!
March 22, 2008 at 1:23 am
To begin with none of you know if I am a she or a he – so just stick to FAM – and I do ask
the part of the commentary by “Doug” be removed saying my deceased brother was lying.
I feel that is inappropriate. Southern girl herself remarked to just stick to facts. And I have no problem with anyone shopping at SAKs as long as they do with money that is truly theirs, not the US govts. I did not say I “corresponded”: with SME – I said I spoke with him – if you can not get the small stuff right then I must question the rest of your commentary. I really think in the name of human decency you should lay off Robert Burroughs – why not say pick on the person that was actually on trial – easy to gang up on a dead man. He cant defend himself . And southern girl – I was not an employee.
Again none of you will bait me – stop trying but I do say stop the things about my brother.
Focus on the man that is in the physic ward now.
March 22, 2008 at 2:07 am
Thank you JAD for that acknowledge of the loss of my brother. I have head rumors
that some Texas newspaper had printed that he committed suicided. No he did not.
I was there when he died – no suicide. But if you have seen this could you direct me to that article – Obviously my brother was ill when he testified and I think several have stated that- perhaps that accounted for his “nervousness” that some one of you seem to continue to point out. And perhaps his memory did seem to be clouded, DOUG as you seem to want to point out – or perhaps you mistook his testimony they way you did because he was dying then – that would kind of take the wind out of any of our sails, dont you think DOUG? SHame you. I hope you dont suffer the way he did, But I am interested in whether any of you have heard anything regarding suicided. which it totally false.
March 22, 2008 at 2:17 am
I am formally asking all of you to cease any commentary about the burroughs family.
Please focus on Stephen Michael Ewing and perhaps his immediate family – or whatever.
But I am asking that all of it stop now.
March 22, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Hello….I apologize to you FAM. I wont discuss your brothers testimony under oath any longer. But you said we shouldn’t discuss your family any longer, so we will cease. Now, we can definitely focus on Mr. Ewing’s immediate family if you so choose, including his spouse, whom you must absolutely love and adore from what I’ve gathered from your prior comments. Were they on trial as well? Were they indicted? Please let me in on why they are so terrible in your eyes…What did they do to you?
March 22, 2008 at 1:46 pm
Well here goes. Ewings immediate family was never interviewed, investigated or subpoenaed as witnesses like the entire Burroughs family was. I do know that Mr Ewing was threatened with his life several times and that Gary Trebert and lawyers from his firm said (and yes I know this as fact because I read the affidavit submitted to the feds from mr Ewings attorney)
“We will bring nuclear Armageddon on you, your employees and your children.” Because he blew the whistle! They were harassed, followed and threatened many times. Bogus lawsuits filed by Treberts fake companies included Mr Ewings mother, his inlaws and 30 employees that choose to leave Treberts office and work for SME, none of which were given immunity or coconspirators. The only good news here is That Gary Trebert will never be allowed to practice law again.
March 22, 2008 at 2:07 pm
He/She FAM
Why do you now only want to discuss Ewings immediate family? Why not also discuss your opinions of the actual testimony from his trial? No, not Burroughs but the other witnesses! Why not answer SG about CFO Heads testimony?????? Is this what you are referring to as being baited??? You are being asked to submit your thoughts of what you overheard while attending the trial. Let’s all be fair and balanced YOU included. Not just pro Burroughs and anti Ewing. yes I met your brother…Nice guy whichever Burroughs it was.
March 22, 2008 at 3:22 pm
DOUG,can you direct me to any article stating my brother committed suicide – totally untrue – but i am interested in finding it.
March 22, 2008 at 9:39 pm
JAD – dont be sure that none of the Ewings were free of any type of question, depositions, etc – perhaps not in this incident but rest assured it happened. You seem to think you are privy to so much JIM – and you met my brother but you dont know who he was – this is a bit tricky huh?
March 22, 2008 at 9:39 pm
Interesting, but I can find no such article on the subject of Robert Burroughs death. My condolences to the family.
In the future, for those who care to post, if you state something like DOUG did regarding the article his wife read – please provide the source – link, etc. or refrain from making the comment.
The blog is provided so that all can have an opportunity to express their opinion, however, we all know that stating something without facts to back it up can inflame tempers and does not serve the greater good.
I’ll leave the comment assuming that there was no ill will intended, but to all…please provide background, citations or links if you are referencing something other than what you have personally experienced.
Chuck
March 22, 2008 at 10:18 pm
Chuck, I have searched and can not find article that like. It is untrue – my brother did not die that way – I feel as though things like that are private and should be kept that way,
but that was in no way the cause of his death. Nothing remotely like that. One never knows when it is their time – and we can be gone so quickly – may Brent rest in peace.
My family has a huge hole in our hearts. Some wounds never heal.
I do ask that the comment please be removed regarding that. I would like to know where it is however.
Please remove the comment.
His obit was a small article in our local paper. He was a private man, forced to be in the public eye and that is unfortnate. But we will continue to respect his wishes, and will not share information.
March 22, 2008 at 10:24 pm
I’ve been watching this blog and find it amusingly entertaining, filled with emotion and various opinions and certain insights. However, from an outsider point of view I noticed a number of what seems to be undisbutable facts:
1. 70 Nursing homes were owned or operated by companies that had false names and ownership on the applications.
2. More than 200 million dollars was improperly obtained.
3. There was more than 150 payroll companies used (why would any legitimate company do this in such a short span of time).
4. 34 million dollars of unpaid payroll taxes was never collected.
5. All three of the parties agreed that trips were made to Europe whereby IRS documents were sent to the US using maildrops.
6. May by the account of all three was just a “figurehead” but was paid between 10K and 25K for his participation. (Guess it’s a nice job if you can get it and it’s legal).
7. Ewing spent over 2.5 million dollars (if that was for 5 years, that’s 500K per year, which I don’t think is chump change) and does not include payments to Trebert and May.
My gosh at the end of the day, what is wrong with this picture? And as to Profit/Loss of the homes, my, my I haven’t heard anything about this.
This is amusing.
March 23, 2008 at 7:16 am
It is interesting that most of the comments have related to what appear to be inter-family connections and the “victimhood” and emotions related to what took place.
I asked a question days ago which has gone un-answered so I’ll try it again just to see if anyone is open to healing from a different perspective.
QUESTION: What could you have done different that could have brought about an outcome that would have had less undesirable consequences?
ANOTHER QUESTION: If you worked at any of the facilities in question (Nursing homes I think) what happened to you regarding the unpaid federal income taxes from your pay check?
Just curious!
March 23, 2008 at 7:57 am
I can address what happens in cases where the employer does not pay the payroll taxes. First, you have to understand that if the company is a “sham” and the paperwork (e.g. quarterly reports are misleading or W2’s or not issued) the employee is left working with the IRS to do a substitute W2. Which can be a hassel for the employee.
Secondly, nothing affects the employee. They receive as normal. However, the IRS issues refunds as normal, but because there was no paying by the employer, it is funded out of the government. So in essence it comes out of the taxes that others have paid. So you and I (and our employers) pay for this out of out monies legitimately paid into the system. The government funds and the scam has in essence have stolen from our system.
March 23, 2008 at 10:54 am
to my knowledge, the Ewing immediate family was never questioned by any govt agency as your FAMily was. Now a lot of people SME spouse and children were deposed by Treberts law firm because of a civil lawsuit filed against a large group including SME’s 90 something yr old mother. Trebert sued approx 20+ people he knew and didn’t know. It was a fact finding mission so that Trebert could find out what anyone had discussed in their interviews with govt agents. I read in a document somewhere that copies of SME’s civil depo was sent anon to his employeesin the mail and links to the internet where it could be viewed just to further humiliate him. That does seem unethical of a lawyer to allow that to happen.
Yes, the numbers in this crime/case are staggering and took many years and a lot of people to investigate.
“What could you have done different that could have brought about an outcome that would have had less undesirable consequences?” From my perspective since facts have just recently been revealed and continue, it’s too early to answer this. Is it even something that should be discussed prior to sentencing? It also seems possible that persons directly involved followed improper illegal advice by Attorney Trebert and his firm. According to May, there was an outside attorney that assisted Trebert with this. I’m not saying the guilty look any less guilty but just something to consider. Makes me want to get many legal opinions in the future and be certain that any legal advice can be trusted.
March 23, 2008 at 10:57 am
Finally – someone showing the something on here – other than wanting to depict us as the takers and poor SME as the abused GIVER. I only came on this blog to give you people perhaps a bit of view as to our side – and yes I am grieving for my brother and perhaps you dont like what I said -but read what SA has written – all you all wanted to do was jump on us and depict as a some poor of needy “white trash” that just called SME for money and then when his “jig” was finally up we got mad and turned on him. Not so. All of you cant seem to take issue with what SA has posted – and yes southern girl that money was spent over a 5 yr period but FIFTY THOUSAND dollars? come on! I have only spoken the truth here from a different side of the fence, but instead of perhaps for lack of a better term embracing my particpation you all attacked me. None of you can begin to understand the toll this has taken on my family – the stress and heartache that this so called GIVER has brought about due to his greed – he did not do to take care of anyone but himself and keep his family in their chosen lifestyle. On our end my family had no choice but to testify – and do you think that is an easy task in any situation? Southern girl can cite all of the things she wants, and I think she talked about utility bills, cars, whatever, but what she is not getting is that while SME may have some paperwork saying these things came to or were for us, they werent – he
had a trail of false paperwork and records all over the world. All of this has caused much stress on my mother, and my brother is gone forever – and I am still waiting for DOUG to list where that came from – perhaps another lie by SME and his followers that I know have been posting here – anyone can have multiple emails and names – just to make my brother look bad. He did not committ suicide -Understandably he was nervous – I mean people it was FEDERAL court – and he obviously was dying then , due to what we know now. Maybe his demeanor made you think he was nervous and whatever, but consider the circumstance before you comment. Get the real picture here and dont just deem us some takers and poor old SME a taker – by the way I hear he is going to church today – perhaps the spouse will rethink her beliefs now – dont know – but I do know that my family has a loss for ever and much heartache – and are now what you all have been trying to make us. We were not on trial.
March 23, 2008 at 10:59 am
correction: dont just deem us some takers and poor old SME a giver
March 23, 2008 at 11:01 am
Soutthrn girl – perhaps your knowledge is more limited than you know.
March 23, 2008 at 11:06 am
Sorry FAM for bringing this up when you have so politely requested that everyone not to respond any more about your deceased brother. But I have not read anything on the internet either about the tragic details of his death. May I also add that you brought it up first. This is clearly how vicious rumors get started.
March 23, 2008 at 11:09 am
Finally someone here – SA = who is stating what some you have been overlooking.
I have tried to give you a view from a different side of the fence and all you have wanted to do is attack my family. Understandably my brother was nervous when he testified and you all have found some fault with it – but now consider the circumstance he was dying – and he did not commit suicided – we have all been depicted as some sort of takers and SME the giver – but think what you will – you seem to skim over the facts that SA has posted.
and while SME may have paperwork that shows utility bills, medical bills, credit cards,
whatever, it was not to our benefit. He had a trial of that type of paperwork all over the world. It is obvious that most of you are his followers and dont want to do more that
make my family look like the bad guys here. We were not the ones on trial nor are we in the physic ward now.
March 23, 2008 at 11:13 am
I did ask if someone could give me information as where that might be found – I
stated that a rumor was heard, and asked for information. Supposedly it was in a newspaper in the Dallas area. I did not start the rumor. I maybe have mentioned
it first, but I am asking where DOUG’s wife read it- Chuck said he could not find it either -
I only said I had heard a rumor and I would like it stopped.
March 23, 2008 at 11:36 am
It absolutely was the members of the Burroughs families that benefited…
Now can FAM discuss all guilty parties to be fair in this forum? Other commenters including myself have tried to have intelligent discussion about other witnesses besides the Burroughs family. And have asked your opinion on the comments made by other witnesses testimony because you were present as you have stated several times. Correct me if I am misunderstanding your lack of willingness, but what was said in the courtroom certainly bares reverence to this continued discussion of healing. SA has brought up important issues that deserve discussion. I am not well versed on the laws and procedures of the IRS or state agencies.
March 23, 2008 at 12:20 pm
SA, I believe the statement about profit/loss was brought up by defense counsel OR the CPS’s from Wichita Falls during the trial.
March 23, 2008 at 12:28 pm
As I stated, I was only here to give you a view from our side of the fence. I was never going to discuss more. And southern girl you are so misguided and biased in your view.
We did not benefit -re-read some posting from “) and try to get over your clearly biased view. You dont know us – and dont know what is the truth.
March 23, 2008 at 12:47 pm
ADVICE: Southern Girl makes a prudent point. As none of the three have been sentenced it would be wise to let the legal system work. While I know that many of you do not feel the system is fair – the reality is – it is the system we live under and none here would want to hinder or hurt the fair administration of justice. Read between the lines – don’t say something here that you would not want repeated in a court of law.
SA – thank you for your comments about the tax implications to the workers at these nursing homes.
ANOTHER QUESTION: Since I don’t know which homes were involved – are they still in operation? What happened if anything to the residents?
March 23, 2008 at 12:59 pm
I’m sorry for my typo.
CPS’s = CPA’s
March 23, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Attending the trial and hearing/reading evidence of testimony does mean then that I am biased or prejudice…..to the facts admitted by prosecution and defense.
From what I know, the nursing homes were transfered to new operators, closed or sold. Mr Trebert currently still has control of 3 as stated in his testimony. I believe most are still in operation with the exception of 1in TX that was closed by the owner so a new facility could be built on the same property.
March 23, 2008 at 1:33 pm
FAM,
“I have only spoken the truth here from a different side of the fence, but instead of perhaps for lack of a better term embracing my particpation you all attacked me.”
The evidence has been removed by Mr Gallagher but your original postings, 3-4 or more of them were evil, belligerent, aggressive and extremely hostile making any of your statements improbable to be believed.
March 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm
For the three families involved: Trebert, May and Ewing – In what ways has this process, that has been ongoing for several years, changed your life?
Do you trust the justice system? If not, did you before this process and how have your attitudes and feelings changed?
This question may be tough to answer, but do you think that May, Ewing and/or Trebert were generally unethical people? Or do you feel they got caught up in something that got out of hand?
Chuck
March 23, 2008 at 7:13 pm
I do not believe that Ewing got caught up in anything that “got out of hand” at all. Prior to this Texas business, he did the same thing at a nursing home in Carbondale, Illinois. However, it WAS on a much smaller level. He is a professional at this kind of stuff and of course, he is a generally unethical individual in my opinion. If he had any morals or ethics, why would he have done this? Seriously.
I trust the justice system, yes! If the justice system was as corrupt as some people on this forum claim, Ewing and his cohorts would never have been caught.
March 23, 2008 at 7:49 pm
“If the justice system was as corrupt as some people on this forum claim, Ewing and his cohorts would have never been caught.” Interesting comment FAM. If you were present at the trial, then you would know that Stephen Michael Ewing was the whistle blower in this case. Before Mr. Ewing sat down with the government, the government had no clue whatsoever this illegal scheme was going on right in front of their noses. It had been for several years. So if Stephen Ewing would have never left the company and gone in and told the government what was going on right in front of their noses, it would still be in full swing right now as we speak. It seems to me that it takes someone with some kind of moral dignity to come forward and explain to the government what was occurring without the government even knowing it was occurring. So FAM, I think you should clarify your comment above and explain what you meant by that.
March 23, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Interesting to assume that to be a white collar criminal one is void of morals and ethics. Now, I accept whatever judgment you wish to throw my way, but let me share a bit here. I was a music director in a church for 12 years, CPA and knew (without doubt) what was moral and ethical.
Yet, I am a convicted felon and have served time in federal prison. So was I a bad apple from the start. Most would say not.
In order for a white collar crime to take place there are generally three things in place: (1) need; (2) opportunity and (3) rationalization. In my case, I was overextended and underfunded. I lived beyond my means. I had a need. As a trusted CPA I had the opportunity. Due to my morals I created the rationalization – after all I would never have thought of myself as a liar and thief.
Yet, when you cut through the crap – I became a liar and a thief and suffered the consequences from it.
That said, I am not sure that everyone who end up in federal prison is without morals or ethics – sometime – may just sometimes – people make wrong choices at the moment and the tide of consequences carries them away.
Can’t speak for Trebert, May or Ewing as I don’t know them so I’ll have to rely on the postings of those who do.
March 23, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Thank you “) for posting that YOU ARE EXACTLY right. He did not get caught up anything that got out of hand. That is something I have been trying to get across. He did do this in Carbondale – he taught them – and Cynthia Martin you are so very wrong. From what I have read that “) has posted, this person sees the reality of the situation – Stephen Michael Ewing was not a whistle blower on himself or anyone else.
Cynthia, please try really hard to keep poster/postings straight – the credit for that comment goes to “) although I agree one hundred per cent with it.
Stephen Michael Ewing has, in my opinion and I have known him all my life,no moral, ethics or decency – he did use members of his own family – made up bogus/sham names and companies – trying to create a maze that would keep the govt confused. It was not to keep my family up – he used their names for his own purposes and to what degree most of you will never know.
You have hit the nail on the head “) – he is a professional at this and got caught.
He is not a whistle blower, a giver, or someone taking care of too many people.
He is where he needs to be and I hope he stays for the rest of his life.
March 23, 2008 at 9:30 pm
As for your questions, Chuck, directed to families this has been a stressful time for us.
as it would be for any one who was to testify in federal court against a relative. We lost one of our family – I am not saying in any sense of the word that this killed him – he had some medical issues but the tremendous stress of the long time this was going on, took a toll on all of us. I am still waiting for DOUG to come up with the source of this newspaper article.
I will not get into too much detail but constant stress in various forms over this for years,
affected the entire family. I see that you say Chuck you were a music director in your chuch, well Steve Ewing was a preacher at one time. Yes he was,and he did know what was moral and ethical. He had his own choices and followed his own path, and now he will pay for that.
He as not a whistle blower – or a giver or whatever saintly qualities some of you have tried to stick him with. He is a professional and he did get caught.
My brother is gone – and my family will never be the same.
May Brent rest in peace-
March 23, 2008 at 10:02 pm
The social security statements of some employes show no income for years of work because the taxes of the employees were not paid.
March 23, 2008 at 10:32 pm
Hello all, I have just discovered this thread and just read it all at once. First things first, FAM and =) – obviously one and the same, it would be nice to hear beyond the redundency of your accusing, one-sided posts to more factual evidence presented in court. I read a couple of times that you were present, and I would like to hear more about this from not only you, but everyone in attendance instead of this bristling quarreling. This case is interesting to me, as I have been following it, and would like to learn more. This case has taught me much about whistle blowing. As evidence presents that SME was the whistle blower and has still wound up in prison, this causes me to rethink the whole idea of doing what one feels is right. Did this have no impact on his outcome from the case? And I also wonder, if he had never come forward, would this scheme would still be in action? Gives you something to think about, doesn’t it? It’s something I find very interesting and a little disturbing, picturing what he must have been through. Did the government create a facade that they were on his side, then suddenly turn their backs? A little dispairing.
March 24, 2008 at 7:45 am
FAM
Based on the research I’ve done thus far – SME (as you claim) is not in a “psych ward” therefore I have edited your post above to remove that statement. I consider that statement inflammatory and wonder why you continue to attack others through such inaccurate inflammatory comments while insisting that comments made by others be removed?
Truth, accuracy and fairness are important for true healing to take place.
Many have read this blog and the resultant comments. It might help those involved to express themselves. Likewise, many people have families that are connected to those who have been sentenced to prison. IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL to continue the dialog so that they can come to understand the full measure of the consequences of poor choices.
Chuck
March 24, 2008 at 7:47 am
Oh, so wrong LAC and I are not one in the same -
March 24, 2008 at 7:48 am
LAC – “) and I are not one in the same – because we are on the same page? How shallow of you.
March 24, 2008 at 7:50 am
and chuck it is standard procedure to hold to psych ward until sentencing to prevent any type of harm
March 24, 2008 at 7:51 am
I have requested that you removed the posting regarding the information that DOUG
had about his wife reading that in a newspaper – that is totally wrong and I am again requesting it be removed.
March 24, 2008 at 7:53 am
SME is a self proclaimed whistle blower – they had been investigating him and
he had done this other places.
March 24, 2008 at 7:59 am
FAM – again, you are inaccurate in your comment that it is standard procedure to hold someone in a “psych ward” until sentencing. Please state facts so that the comments will be meaningful.
Regarding the newspaper…I believe that I and others may have clarified that we have been able to find no such article – at least an internet search turns up nothing. It would take me the better part of a day to remove any offensive comments and I have other issues to be concerned with – no offense is intended.
I will try to keep the dialog focused on truth and when an inaccuracy is found I will do my best to point it out. However, I cannot be relied on to remove or point out all inaccuracies.
My best to all today.
Chuck
March 24, 2008 at 8:02 am
Actually, Mr. Gallagher, whether you would like to realize it or not – the government feels that it IS necessary to hold SME in a psychiatric ward until sentencing. You are, believe it or not, wrong.
March 24, 2008 at 8:37 am
Thanks so much “) Chuck apparently does not believe it – and it is the truth. Yet he has time to remove my comment about it and can not find the time to remove offensive, false statement about my brother. I feel that is wrong and I feel Chuck is showing actually how biased he is – I am disappointed in you Chuck. Thanks again “)
I am again formally requesting that those comments be removed. You can find the time cant you Chuck – you are a stand up sort of guy now arent you?
March 24, 2008 at 11:28 am
I knew the 3 men charged with this conspiracy. May and Ewing much more so than Trebert. Trebert is a person who uses his legal power to intimidate others. I know for fact that he threatened both May and Ewing with harm.. To me that speaks volumes towards ones morals and ethics. While I don’t pretend to know the details of the case or who signed what or who impersonated whom I can talk about the Mays and about the Ewings personally. They must have made wrong decisions when it came to business then admitted it, but that does not make them or their immediate family unmoral or bad people. I happen to know that both Ewing children received generous scholarships to SMU from the United Methodist Church and that Mr Ewing attended church regularly as do his family. Mr Ewing and Mr May have always supported kids. Mr May volunteered to coach baseball because he loved being around kids and the game and generously donated money to Trinity Highschool for the choir program and baseball teams booster clubs. Also Nolan Highschool. Mr and Mrs Ewing supported their childresn schools with their time and money. Their children are intelligent, thoughtful and know right from wrong. They muct be proud of their father making that decision to blow the whistle. Setting an example that their actions are their own consequences. The Ewing family has my heartfelt wishes right now as many people in our community. I also know that Ewing and then May absolutely came forward of their own free will with information of the goings on at their company. I read in the paper that May, at the request of the Feds wore a wire to Treberts office. That too says volumes that they were fully cooperating. Whistle blower laws confuse me and it seems that their attorneys failed to protect them from the Feds. I’m honestly now scared what is actually taking place within this administration and the unethical practices within the Justice Dept. So much in the news is being reported about this.
Now Fam and happy face, do not come back at me with crap because I m giving my opinions. I love the Ewings and Mays and know that sentencing will reveal their kindness, generosity and morals from everyone (except the Burroughs) who knows them personally.
Thank you Mr Gallagher for the opportunity to be heard.
March 24, 2008 at 12:22 pm
FTW – I am wishing you a happy life in your dream world. Forgery, making false statements, impersonating other, flying to Europe multiple times to attempt to confuse
officials about things, impersonating people, does not fall under the heading of making bad business decisions – those things would be forgery, fraud and all of those other things………He did this in Carbondale on a a much smaller scale. Continue live in your rosy world and the Ewing offspring are both over 21 -and if you know them both then you must know that have their own problems – their own issues – and 13 years of college between the two of them was not paid for by the United Methodist Church.
March 24, 2008 at 12:24 pm
Yes Steve was always involved in ball for one of the offspring that is how me met May –
many parents are these days -
March 24, 2008 at 12:26 pm
I would like you,FTW to please clarify your last paragraph.
March 24, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Stephen Michael Ewing is now known as inmate – 22018-077 and is being held at Fort Worth FCI. I have no information from either the US Attorney’s office or the Bureau of Prisons that Stephen Michael Ewing is being held under any special circumstances.
March 24, 2008 at 12:46 pm
FTW, I do not understand why you attacked me personally. The only thing that I have done here is state my opinion(s) to a question or two that Mr. Gallagher asked REGARDING everyones opinions. What is your problem?
Do you even know who the Burroughs family is? FAM is correct. CHILDRENS NAMES REMOVED AS THEY ARE NOT THE TOPIC OF DISCUSSION! Where did that education come from, considering neither Stephen or Teri, his wife, had a LEGITIMATE job? Hmm. I wonder. REMOVED DUE TO PRIVACY!
This is something that everyone seems to comment on and is COMPLETELY false: SME did NOT blow the whistle on himself. Yes, he did confess BUT he did NOT tell the truth during his “confession” and that is why he did not plea bargain, wanted a jury trial, and is more than likely going to spend the rest of his life in either a psychiatric institution or in a correctional facility.
I have not posted ANYTHING on this blog that has been intentionally malicious or untrue… Nor have I attacked anyone for the things that they are saying, so please do not pull that “don’t come back at me with crap” stuff, FTW girl. I know the Ewing family personally, as well as the Burroughs family, and am stating nothing but the truth. Perhaps you have just failed to see these things.
Finally, I think it’s pretty interesting that everyone that has commented on this blog, save for FAM and SA, continue to repeat each other but change just a FEW words. Everything that is being said is all about SME being a wonderful giver, a fantastic provider, and nothing but an amazing individual who apparently vomits up rainbows. Read back through your posts, you all are saying the EXACT SAME THING. Why can’t any of you form your own opinions about this man? I am sorry to be so negative but this really perplexes me. Why is it that anyone who says the slightest thing that could be misconstrued as not positive is deliberately ATTACKED? If you all are actually friends with this wonderful, morals-and-ethics-based, Christian man wouldn’t you, too, treat others like you are such?
March 24, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Thank you so much “) – you are completely correct. These wonderful friends of this giver have done but attack me, try to insinuate things about my deceased brother,
and on and on and on. Thanks you so much. I am not sure who you are but you are correct all the way. I only tried to give them a view from our side of the fence, something that is not going to be seen often and they are a vicious bunch.
March 24, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Chuck what you have stated is public knowledge – and may I ask why you would have any specific information more than anyone else of any special circumstance?
March 24, 2008 at 3:26 pm
FAM – Correct what I stated is public information. I keep hearing that Mr. Ewing is in a psych ward (something you’ve stated several times in your comments) which is inaccurate as an FCI by nature doesn’t have a psych ward. I just want to keep the conversation factual. When you state something as fact that seems inflammatory, I feel it appropriate (as I have time) to find out what the truth is. I stand by my statement, I have had NOTHING TO CONFIRM that Mr. Ewing is anything other than being held in Fort Worth FCI awaiting sentencing.
March 24, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Then CHuck is you want to do so, remove the things about my brother ’s suicide.
That is not factual not true and I have repeatedly asked you to do that – but yet you have time to remove and comment other things. I am beginning to think you are biased.
Why dont or wont you remove that?
March 24, 2008 at 4:14 pm
Using names, Happy Face???? I wonder what defamation of character now stands at the ready??
Everyone can read for yourselves what the personalities are in this blog. And SG is correct… the really vile communications (if you can even imagine) have already been removed by Chuck Gallagher.
Chuck – You are absolutely correct. SME is NOT and has not been in a psych ward.
Thank you for doing your homework. However, this now sets you up for attack by “you-know-who.”
I have no doubt that healing is needed by many… for as many different reasons. But those who need it the most will not receive it through the activity here. The problems are much too serious. They did not start with SME, and they will not end there.
I have learned much from the testimony and insights that have been shared here by SG, Cynthia and others who were REALLY in the courtroom. I would have liked to hear from others… and learned their insights… whether it be good or bad for “my side.”
I want to suggest that everyone leave this blog for something else. This is not positive. There is no healing going on here. Anything constructive is met with immediate attack making a meaningful dialogue absolutely impossible. Go enjoy an ice cream cone with a friend. It’s a nice day! And most of us know how to make the best of it!
March 24, 2008 at 4:15 pm
FAM it has been removed – was done so earlier today. State facts before you make a comment. Everything works better that way.
NOTE TO ALL: In the future, I will likely not be removing statements as your collective requests are too time consuming. Please keep the discussion limited to Ewing, Trebert and May.
March 24, 2008 at 4:36 pm
BAS perhaps you are not privy to more than what is on the internet for all to see.
As far as the children – the are well over 21 and have benefited from the money obtained by unlawful means.
You seem to want to mention everything else – they reaped the benefits and were not eligible for scholarships as has been stated by their dear friends.
And just for your information it is the norm for people to be put in the psych ward, to keep them safe. That is the case for many and perhaps not made public knowledge but remains to be a fact. But for those that are in a fragile state it is and certainly should be where they are put.
And Chuck – thanks for finally removing that offense and untrue things about my brother.
March 24, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Ftw girl – you fancy yourself on authority on the Ewings – Steve did attend church.
As did his offspring but the rest of the household – spouse – would not -= not a believer
is what I was told- and would certainly not be my opinion – having met her 30 yrs ago and she has done to change my opinion since.
March 24, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Fam and happy face-
Would you please allow others to make comments without always attacking them. It’s obvious here, how you feel about Ewing family. Let others comment as they want! YES, I’ve known them for a very long time and no need to throw insults my way. My opinion will not change of them but it certainly has with regards to his family in IL. None of my comments were directed at you except for the last paragraph for this very reason “you fancy yourself on authority on the Ewings” is such a rude statement and totally unnecessary.
Hang in there Chuck and don’t allow any commenter to bully you either.
March 24, 2008 at 5:24 pm
FTW girl, that is my opinion and I am an entitled to mine as you are to yours. If you knew the Ewings so well, you would know who exactly attends church regularly.
You still have not explained the last statement of your first post. As usual, you saints are
hanging right in there with that giving, loving, truthful way.
Perhaps you too FTW girl dont know as much truth as you think about them. Obviously
not.
March 24, 2008 at 5:26 pm
Chuck, have you considered shutting down the comments? There are probably legal issues pertaining to defamation of character. And FAM if you continue to bring Ewing children into this you are opening yourself up about your own AND I QUOTE YOUR CHOICE OF WORD “offspring” Ewings family does include you and your child.
Let’s talk about past employees and how they feel about this verdict.
March 24, 2008 at 5:28 pm
And FTW girl I did not see where you that you even know who the Burroughs are, much less know them. How can you have a true opinion of anyone without knowing them?
Perhaps you givers are special that way. Perhaps you are one of those SMU sorority girls.
Dont know. But good luck to you.
March 24, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Actually, it would be of interest to see what past employees feel about the circumstances they have found themselves in.
NOTE: As I have said in the past, don’t say something here that you would not want repeated in a court of law. This is a public blog with little oversight. Actually, I’ve spent far too much time on oversight thus far.
Please keep your comments pertinent to the conviction of Trebert, May and Ewing. Speaking of which, I hear little from May folks. Perhaps they are quit and prefer not to respond, but since I study White Collar Crime, it would be interesting to have their perspective.
March 24, 2008 at 6:23 pm
JAD you really dont know who i am or if i have any offspring
March 24, 2008 at 7:16 pm
Au contraire.
March 24, 2008 at 7:31 pm
Chuck – Most of us greatly appreciate your efforts to try and keep things fair and balanced. I can’t imagine trying to do this myself for the last….. 2 weeks??? I’ve read a couple of your other blogs that are taking place. You’ve really got some interesting things going. And you’re right….. this particular thread requires way too much of your time.
I, too, would be very curious…. Is there anyone out there who has insights into Trebert and May? I’m not sure what is OK to say since they aren’t yet sentenced. But those 2…. talk about opposite ends of the ethics spectrum!
March 24, 2008 at 7:53 pm
I think there are many lessons that can be learned. Many people most likely had an “inkling” that things were not right and many did not. I think the first lesson is to ask questions and be observent of things that go on around you. Do some math, even if not prompted or forced to do so…..
I know of some people involved that received some benefit and took the “easier” path to not inquire or research. Why? Well with a comfortable income and the need to provide for one’s self and family we often overlook things that could jepordize our life styles. This is point one.
Point two is if there are any questions to have the willingness and courage to speak up, report, confirm, validate and take whatever action one needs to do at the risk of losing your livelihood. Yes that means even quiting. You call these points INITIATIVE and CHARACTER.
I have a couple of other points, but will leave these two for discussion and contemplation.
March 24, 2008 at 8:04 pm
i googled this case after reading it in the news paper.. and came across this blog. and couldn’t help but give an outside perspective. There is obviously a family feud between FAM and SME.. i don’t think that’s in question. And obviously there is an immediate connection between FAM and
… for the only thing they talk about is how the Burroughs family is a victim. (and i agree with gallagher.. let’s think about choices that effect our future,, aka.. move on) But i’m confused.. other than your brother dying of natural causes, (which has happened to us all) how so? From what i’ve read… SME supported your family, southern girl stated there was evidence of paychecks to your brother, you had the government holding your hand through the entire case. which seems obvious… they wanted to prosecute.. and what better weapon than an actual family member who will testify against SME. what more did you want?? i’m guessing a SAKS gift card cause that’s all you talk about SME spending money on. you seem pretty bitter about that. (and fyi… quarter of a million dollars at SAKS in ONE season?? is that your statement? i know a couple of gay millionaires in new york that couldn’t pull that off!)
i learned a lot from reading this blog. and BAS.. i HOPE someone writes a book. you said that a while back.. and i’m sad that you stopped blogging.. b/c i loved reading yours. i’ll be the first to commission it for a movie… this case has the works… conspiracy, govt. abusing power and rigging a trial… and most of all… the black sheep family members from Illinois who won’t pass up a good opportunity to do the devil’s deed. that’s a blockbuster hit!
chuck.. this blog was a great idea. i learned so much. i just wish it wasn’t diluted with personal vendettas… not only does it get really really repetitive (seriously.. i had to skim through most of your entries FAM and friends… it was the same thing over and over.. ) your entries were the ones i definitely learned nothing from… other than the fact that you really don’t like SME.. but you and your friends seem to be the only one. Perhaps instead of blogging every day you should seek a 12 step program for recovering Grudge Addicts. and stop kicking a family while they’re down.. they’re obviously struggling emotionally considering the verdict of this trial.. and i don’t see anywhere in these blog entries where they have done that to you. what is wrong with you?
my mother actually has lunch with one of the people from the jury… i wish i could talk to her. because from what it seems… SME walked into certain defeat. but after taking in facts from the trial that were stated in this blog… and seeing the defense rested in light of the fact the govt. case was filled with holes… was it so certain? how easy was it for that juror to say guilty. for all of them. was there even the least bit of doubt? i hope the book that is written has some insight from the jury’s perspective. i’d definitely be the first to buy it.
March 24, 2008 at 8:33 pm
You may think you know so very much but think what you will. And I know what I know
and everyone will be happy.
March 24, 2008 at 8:52 pm
That’s an excellent point. The right to think as one wills. Even in Christianity God allows us to think as we we will and greater yet to chose as we will. American freedom goes hand in hand with this concept.
Adding to Chuck’s comment/question regarding what lessons have we learned and what could one have done, I would ask where do we go from here? I think the first step forward and a foundational concept is in the quote, “whatsoever games are played with others, let us play no games with ourselves, but deal in our last honesty and truth”.
Albeit remember that as actions have consequences, so do thoughts. Maybe not affecting others so much, but rather to affect ourselves primarily. Kinda like worrying. It can affect you adversely and even cause you to take the worng action. Whatever your thoughts are (and they could be the very perfect thoughts), what is the “fruit” of these thoughts for yourself and others.
March 24, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Kubrick – you could not be more off the mark. And SME did not support our family – we are all gainfully employed on our own. Please read the entire blog and comment on what Chuck is asking – none of you can begin to know or apparently see the real picture.
As happy face said, you all think he is some saint and a wonderful giver. Yes I take issue with anyone spending that much money obtained fraudulently. Saks is a luxury store,
and that is alot of money – especially ill gotten monies. This crime is horrendous.
Any one that would have members of their own family impersonated, not to mention forge their names, do horrendous things with their own elderly mother’s identity, and on and on and on deserves to me where he is. There was never any “feud” between SME and myself.
I spoke with him several times during the trial – and can not understand why you people do not get that. You really dont know what is going on and until you do what not wait until then to comment. Some one mentioned defamation of character and I am thinking that is what you are doing Kubrick.
March 24, 2008 at 11:25 pm
To continue KUBRICK – you have no facts, and you know nothing. And a sibling dying has not happened to us all – perhaps you are like SME – an almost perfect creature – a giver and all of the rest………but really in the interest of no defamation of character, please keep your comments out about my family – the Burroughs family – which whether you all realize it or not – we are unfortunately SME”s family – much to our shame.
March 25, 2008 at 7:22 am
To those who may know – What motivated SME to seek a jury trial vs. taking a plea bargain. Generally, it seems that those who make it easy on the government get lesser time than those who take the trial approach.
Knowing that I was not there at the trial – it must have been obvious that SME was guilty since the verdict came back in 60 minutes.
If you were at the trial and have some insight into TRIAL vs. PLEA – I would be interested in understanding the motivation for the choice.
March 25, 2008 at 7:39 am
Kubrick – I honestly don’t know who you and SA are, but it is so good to have your perspective. You know, one of the hardest things for me to do is to stop trying to be reasonable with unreasonable people. HOWEVER, you bring up an EXCELLENT point about the jury finding the 3rd one guilty. After the other 2 plead guilty…. just how easy was it for the jury to vote guilty for the third one? After all, where there’s smoke, there’s fire, right? I’ve never stated that I believe everyone… any of them… are totally “innocent.” But I do believe some had no regard for legality and ethics, while others got in over their heads very quickly…. realized what was going on…. wanted out… and got burned BADLY. Of course, sentencing hasn’t been done yet. And I am truly hoping that all of that is taken into account. I know that the mastermind and the real criminal here plead guilty and will not (in my mind) get the sentence he deserves. Someone should make inquiries… or do some homework… and see who all got immunity by your Fed. Govt. It infuriates me that so many were allowed to get off scott-free… and we’re talking legal folks… people who know better… and are expected to be a better example than many of us (of course, having been familiar with some aspects of the legal world through the years, I say this somewhat tongue in cheek)…. while the govt pinned the whistle-blower. And if the govt did not have in mind to provide the protection they apparently promised, why were SME’s Miranda rights not read until days after he had spent all this time spilling his guts to the govt??? Did you know that it is a Federal crime to lie to any Fed official? Did you know that it is NOT a crime for a Fed official to lie to you? Perjury is perjury…. Against the law. But when you are having discussion/conversation that is not sworn testimony, the Fed Govt has the right (authority??) to lie to you as it sees fit… without ANY fear of criminal prosecution. But if you lie to them, you can be criminally punished. (U.S. Code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Section 1001). Scroll about half way down this article and read the explanation and all the examples of lies told by the Fed Govt so they could get the conviction they sought… whatever the cost. Now what’s sad about this?? The Govt apparently has the right to lie to SME and tell him he has immunity… encouraging him to tell all… and in some discussions incriminate himself (I’m sure!). My beef here? The Govt must be ABOVE the law, not exempt from it. Now how does all this tie to SME’s case? Well – My next research is going to look at rights of whistleblowers….. And, hopefully, tie the 2 together….
Chuck – I also want to get involved in the discussion you bring up above….
March 25, 2008 at 9:05 am
BAS you are wrong about the mastermind and the real criminal here pleading guilty.
It is a fact that SME did this in Carbondale Illinois. He did not know those two at that point. He is a professional at this and he taught them. Trebert has his own issues but if anyone get sucked in in my opinion it was May – as has been stated here before people are much more than they seem – and that is so true. SME has a history of this.
Reread the posting of SA – people here need to realize that this is just a five year period – there is so much more that led up to this. Grow up and quit blaming the big bad govt and place the responsibity where it is and should be with the three.
But at least they had the good sense to plead guilty – telling his story (and by the way I dont believe he got to do that) obviously did not matter and it should not – whatever reasons he may have concocted for this are a non issue – the truth is he commited multiple crimes and thank God he is where he should be for more than likely for the rest of his life.Dont you all realize that he did this to the people of the United States
and should be appropriately punished? Grow up.
March 25, 2008 at 9:10 am
“This crime is horrendous. Any one that would have members of their own family impersonated, not to mention forge their names, do horrendous things with their own elderly mother’s identity, and on and on and on deserves to me where he is.”
Okay already I will agree with you… Feel better??? Now, please move on! Here is a brand new audience just waiting to hear from you. http://jerryspringer.blogspot.com/
Chuck, I am interested in your experience and knowledge of whistle blowers with regard to white collar crime.
March 25, 2008 at 9:11 am
Kubrick I really take offense with you calling Ewing’s family in Illinois the black sheep.
You dont know us you dont know him – I really think you owe us at the very least an apology – you are just one of those that think they should jump on the band wagon.
So your mommy had lunch with a juror – wow that is a real gem of a find.
Your posting should be edited at the very least. Isnt that defamation of character?
March 25, 2008 at 9:12 am
JAD really -
March 25, 2008 at 9:16 am
UPDATE: Yesterday I stated where Stephen Michael Ewing is incarcerated and his identifying number. I stated he was at an FCI which is a minimum security facility. I placed calls to representatives of the courts to confirm the status of his incarceration pending his sentence in July. I received confirmation this morning that Ewing is – in fact – being held at the FCI and due to the nature of an FCI he is not in a “psych ward” or on some suicide watch.
I consider both of those statements made earlier inflammatory and inaccurate.
In the federal prison system if either of those two statements were true (which they are not) he would not be at an FCI.
As a point of reference. I have no connection to Ewing, Trebert or May. I have no “dog” in this fight. My motivation is to discuss the relationship between CHOICES and CONSEQUENCES. To that end, based on the comments from some, you are making comments – which are choices – that will have consequences. Be careful what you say and the harm that may be wished on others, because what you generally are critical of is a reflection of what you are critical of in YOURSELF.
As I have time…I’ll write a personal example of how that works in real life from my own experience.
March 25, 2008 at 9:17 am
Fam and happy face you have defecated your own character.
March 25, 2008 at 9:18 am
Oops my bad, my apology…
Fam and happy face have defamated your own character.
March 25, 2008 at 9:33 am
FAM… i see now there is no reasoning with the unreasonable. you spew off about knowing or not knowing all the facts… i’ve read through this entire blog and you have not stated a one. all you do is spout horrendous accusations.. and if someone calls you out… you call them a liar.. or that they’ve been manipulated. that’s called paranoia… and all this time you’ve been saying SME needs mental help… i believe it’s you FAM… and i’m absolutely sincere in that. and that is all i can do for you. and will therefore leave our conversation at that.
BAS – that is soooo crazy. the FEDs have the right to lie to you about immunity to get you to talk. although… i’m not so sure they’re going above the law in doing so. They’re absolutely slicing right through it.
what have i learned Chuck??? that if the government ever promises me anything at all… i will surely get it in writing before i hold up my end of the deal.
March 25, 2008 at 9:59 am
Chuck while he is at FCI now that was not the place we were referring to – I do not believe that was the first place he was taken to, to await sentencing. I never stated he was in a physic ward at FCI – never – not the first time.
March 25, 2008 at 10:14 am
Kubrick, I dont believe I have called anyone here a liar. I have only stated my opinions as we are all entitled to – and what I know to be the truth. Early on – before you joined in- I stated I would be offering a view from our side – a side that none of you know a thing about. We are not as you wonderful disciplies of the wonderful giver have stated, black sheep, users and on and on. You do not know us and have never taken the time to ask, only to belittle and name call us. You know nothing about us, and really dont know a fraction of the story of SME. You cant. So while you can obviously say anything you want to me with no response from Chuck, I will say this to you – I pity you. You are the worst kind of poster, one with no thought of their own, can only rephrase and repeat. You are like mindless sheep – poor ole Steve – big bad govt.
He started this journey a long time ago, has caused our entire family much heartache and humilitation – you people dont know any of us – really – you will think whatever you want but I know what he has done – it was not bad business decisions, and all of that – he taught the other two – he learned how along time ago to keep them in a lifestyle they felt they were entitled to.
We defraud you people – obtained your money in a sense – and lived a Trump life style on it. He was not a care taker of many families – he took their indenities and forged their names and used false names when all else failed. He made the choice to do that.
No one forded him and now he will pay with more than likely the rest of his life. He is 60 years old – to be sentenced on his 61st birthday – hopefully he will get the help he needs.
March 25, 2008 at 10:17 am
My misspell – HE DEFAUDED you people before you all jump on me like mad dogs.
March 25, 2008 at 10:46 am
Since you know what he’s done… and everyone here has heard your case… over and over and over again. Why don’t you leave? Don’t you have a job? A family to take care of? Apparently it’s been humiliated… why do you make it worse by carrying about in this blog?
You pity me.. however this was a blog that i came across and it took up an hour of my time. I wanted to know a little more. (i’ve yet to learn anything from you.. other than the fact that i feel sorry for SME.. not because he’s in jail… but because he has family members like you) this blog it seems has consumed your life. why? is this therapy for you? is this helping you? what good is coming of lying and slandering on a blog site?
chuck wants to talk about choice… and it’s consequences. that’s why i posted this entry. i’m interested in FAM’s choice to keep blogging the same case over and over again every day of her life when she claims to have a victimized family…. why doesn’t she go do something about it? what are the consequences of her choice to be so completely unproductive on a BLOG site no less. it doesn’t seem she cares for her family at all… seems all she cares is to make sure everyone knows her side of the story. when is it enough?
March 25, 2008 at 10:57 am
Kubrick, how long I post is none of your concern – and you might want to watch here – you are dangerously close to defammation of character here – accusing me of lying, etc. You know nothing but how to repeat and rephrase – and I do indeed pity you.
March 25, 2008 at 11:00 am
I would like to know Kubrick – none of you really know if I am a he or she – but again Kubrick – you like to repeat and repeat and rephrase and try to make it sound original.
March 25, 2008 at 11:02 am
Kubrick, what I would like to know is where you get your information?
March 25, 2008 at 11:18 am
when is it enough?
March 25, 2008 at 11:58 am
BAS you taught FAM a new word and phrase to use.
Now FAM let’s further educate you to it’s correct spelling and definition.
As stated at Def.com
Defamation: the act of defaming; false or unjustified injury of the good reputation of another, as by slander or libel; calumny:
From my sources opinion, FAM is a female and has a daughter or offspring. Neither of which were asked to be Federal witnesses and missed out on the free trip to DFW nor did they receive any financial assistance from any Ewing from Texas. Two brothers, ones daughter and their mother/grandmother (not Mr Ewings mother) were here (FTW) and eager to say whatever was necessary to stay off prosecution. (No not the little girl, she got to come along on the flight etc) Being the victims of such horrendous crimes such as impersonation, forgery and identity theft one would wonder with the knowledge of what was happening for so long, why did you and your loving family not come forward first? Did they not impersonate each other and forge each others names as I have heard/read through the Grapevine? (Star Telegram or Dallas Morning News)
Quoting SA:
“I know of some people involved that received some benefit and took the “easier” path to not inquire or research. Why? Well with a comfortable income and the need to provide for one’s self and family we often overlook things that could jepordize our life styles. This is point one.”
She makes a lot of sense here people. That would not only apply to families of all parties and the 3 indicted but also employees who knew very well what was going on. People tend to turn a blind eye then they can declare not guilty of knowing The govt. offered immunity to everyone and their brother/sister it seems. So many guilty people of something and not wanting to jeopardize that lifestyle.
Kub, Did the juror ever talk about the trial to your mother? I would be interested in that info.
Believe it or not, I feel so sorry for everyone affected by these crimes. Employees who didn’t get their income stated correctly. That is such a hassle to correct. It’s so difficult and such a pain not even getting a W-2 from my past employer. (not related to this in any way)
FAM your pain are very deep as well as your families including the Ewings. The freeflowing salt you continue to dredge the wounds through are satanical (in my opinion) As I respect your opinion as do others, please respect ours. Defamation is a word that should be thrown around lightly.
March 25, 2008 at 12:04 pm
SA, it’s only my opinion that you might be female. Sorry if I am wrong and no need to correct me.
Thanks for your much needed comments!
March 25, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Sorry for my typos. I’m recovering from surgery and I ment to say that Defamation is a word that should NOT be thrown around lightly.
March 25, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Sorry for my typos. I’m recovering from surgery (not a good excuse but give me a break) and I meant to say that Defamation is a word that should NOT be thrown around lightly.
March 25, 2008 at 1:04 pm
FTW for such a sugary little follower, you truly dont have very good sources, which doe s not surprise me in the least. We are all free to think what we want however, too bad most of you dont exercise that freedom.
Your commentary has no facts only what you have stated as opinion, and you are free to do that of course, but really only state your own opinions. You are way off the mark.
Perhaps you needs to change your sources. But really please keep in mind what you are offering up as the defintion of defamation. You are dangerously close.
And you have never clairified what i asked you to.
March 25, 2008 at 1:08 pm
As far as impersonations, etc, FTW – Chuck has asked you to cite your source – so which one is it and what day’s edition? I would be interested in knowing – moreover
that is what is supposed to be done when something like that is posted.
March 25, 2008 at 1:11 pm
FTw girl you really can not begin to understand obviously. You have no idea what is the truth – since you are such a loving follower of the wonderful givers, you can not see the truth. I wish you luck. Perhaps you should change your blinders.
March 25, 2008 at 1:18 pm
FTW girl – you have no reason to “speak” to me so – must be the sorority girl in you surfacing – or maybe the captain who – knows – but really that behavior is not becoming .
March 25, 2008 at 1:23 pm
What I was saying is not to give me crap because of my opinions and that The Burroughs family doesn’t have anything nice to say about either Ewing or May. (or anyone else it seems, how sad for your pathetic life in my opinion) I am dangerously close to what?? a lawsuit from you? (my opinion that you like to threat) Have a wonderful afternoon everyone, its beautiful outside and I just may have to get out a bit and do a little shopping at my favorite store, Saks Fifth Avenue.
March 25, 2008 at 2:07 pm
FAM/happy face: In the D/FW area, there are a lot of people… a LOT of people… who are familiar with the Trump lifestyle. And the Ewing lifestyle doesn’t even come close! And how funny that you would think the numbers you throw out are the Trump lifestyle! Maybe in So. IL, but not here, and not in NYC and not in LA and not in Chicago and not in…. you name it anywhere in the world! In all of these places, it is VERY common… although not with me… for people to spend a LOT of $$ at Saks, on Rodeo Drive, etc. You should see the cars everyone down here drives! You should visit the lovely, EXPENSIVE restaurants that are too numerous to mention down here. You’d flip out if you saw the homes/estates in Southlake, Highland Park, etc. Now the rural life has its draw, for me that’s for sure, but there is a much bigger world out there than the 2 of you have been exposed to. Nothing wrong with that… but if I were you, I’d just learn to be happy where I was, instead of parading your jealousy from one minute to the next on this blog. Me?? Well, I’m off to Saks. Maybe I’ll run into FTW Girl… or Donald Trump!
March 25, 2008 at 2:21 pm
FTW and BAS – spare me your smart comments – I have been to DFW many times.
You know nothing about me at all – I am glad you think you are humorous – goes to show your limited you really are. YOu have no clue about me or any of us – only what you think you know. YOu are very sad and to be pitied.
Neither of you has even a clue.
March 25, 2008 at 2:23 pm
FTW girl the captain has obviously made you make absolutely no sense at all.
March 25, 2008 at 2:48 pm
There is a little saying I like to refernce. One must take responsibility and with that they are held accountable which equates into consequences.
Not that I could incite any MORE debate (I jest), but when one wants immunity is it because they have nothing to be immuned from? I find it curious that the issue of immunity is spoken of often with this case and question why would the innocent need immunity.
In that vain I would ask why would May and SME join together to “whistle blow” then May so quickly plea a deal. Could it be he understood the wrong he had involved himself in and out of repentent character decide to take responsibility for his actions?
As to whistle blowers there are a couple of reasons one might do this. One may do this for the right reason and it may be they do this for the wrong reason. Just something to ponder.
March 25, 2008 at 3:22 pm
SA, good post and good points to ponder. I was wondering along those lines with regard to May – we of course, will never really know -perhaps he did it out of repentent character, but it is also possible tha the is thinking that the first one on the bus gets the best seat……….perhaps he turned out to be the more intelligent of the three.
Say what they might, at the end of the day it is most likely that Trebert and May will
be out before SME.
It is a terrible situation – and very sad, SME had much potential and had he channeled it in the proper way, life could have turned out much better for him. He went to college for 8 years – not graduating – which is better than 9 – but his parents paid for that with their hard earned money – and nothing to show for that eight years.
He is sixty years old – in the last part of his life – and is spending it more than l ikely in custody.
To say this was “bad business decisions” is more than a bit naieve. This was intentional and much larger and more complex than what was done in Carbondale.
Lives are forever changed by this – and some of are no longer here.
You people can say what you will about us – call us names and try to put us down – but you have no idea as to what is the truth.
But regardless of what great guys you might think any or all of them are, the bottom line is like it or not – and I refer to SA’s post here – they did so many many things –
false names used, impersonation, forgery and the list goes on – they are all going to spend some time with the Bureau of Prisons.
What a waste for everyone.
March 25, 2008 at 3:27 pm
May or his family doesn’t seem to be present at least in comments, but wouldn’t it be expensive to go to trial? If admitting to the scheme wouldn’t that mean that he assumed the jury would find him guilty. So why spend the big money for a defense? Trebert had a top criminal lawyer and I’,m just guessing a million dollar defense and they probably didn’t see any way out for him either. but then why does it seem as though if a defendant goes to trial which is his right, why does it seem as though he was punished for doing that very thing? Someone said that if he had pled guilty then it would have saved the tax payers the additional expense of trial from the govt thus allowing the possibility of “downward departure” Can you plead guilty and still get a trial?
March 25, 2008 at 3:33 pm
JAD, why would a person plead guilty and get a trial? Isnt that the purpose of a trial for a jury of one’s peers to decide, based on evidence, etc? I am not sure, but I dont think that May is married and have not heard of any more relatives than his mother, maybe?
March 25, 2008 at 3:40 pm
So many counts and isn’t it possible to only feel/believe guilt of a few? Assuming you do not know what the jury instructions would be. Maybe you cannot pled guilty to just 1 or 2 or 3 counts.
March 25, 2008 at 3:56 pm
I also know that during his college years SME joined the military. I’ve seen his card, and please FAM if there are other details of this please keep it to yourself. I’m not bringing this up so you can use this against him. I’m just making a comment.
March 25, 2008 at 4:19 pm
I know all about the military experience (for goodness sake – we lived in the same house ) and I see no reason why YOU should be
bringing it up – and I think that you were the one that posted much false, mean
things here about some of the rest of us-(that CHuck deleted) and YOU are asking me to take the high road – the college was mentioned – for sure – nothing wrong with that – he had opportunities and he did not make them work fo him. He was/is very intelligent.
I mean really – it some degree to set all of that in motion. I really do think you owe an apology.; You were malicious JAD
March 25, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Wonder since all three have been convicted and await sentencing – if Trebert, Ewing and May had a voice – wonder what they would say to us today?
March 26, 2008 at 6:45 am
I think SME had been harrassed so much through the last few years…. with Trebert’s threats to him and his family…. Trebert’s frivolous lawsuits filed at whim that involved his kids, his mother (although they never panned out, they still had to be defended)… And not being able to depend on authorities… He had to have felt that his life was no longer his own…. Even though he thought he had done the right thing to call in the authorities and lay everything out there, I certainly would have felt double-crossed…. I’m sure he must have felt the same way. We may never know (certainly in a public forum) what all SME grappled with to try and maintain normalcy in his life…. what betrayal he must have/does?? feel knowing that he was the right person to call in the authorities and lead them through the quagmire that Trebert had created. Then to have everyone around you “pardoned” by the govt, except you. It’s so much easier to sit back and say nothing. But the one who decides to open Pandora’s Box has to make a conscious choice to deal with ramifications to himself and his family. And prepare to read in the newspaper all the sordid details of one’s life…. no matter how true or false… it’s all there for everyone to read and throw stones. What does he feel NOW? I bet there’s some relief! Relief from the constant pursuit of frivolous lawsuits… watching over your shoulder because you’re being followed… fearing for your life and your family’s. I bet ” I ” would have enjoyed spending a day at Saks’ with all that to deal with. Guilty or innocent… I can’t help but have respect for the one who decides to step up to the plate… and risk losing everything. Others could have…… but didn’t. Everyone has their reasons for making the choices they made.
March 26, 2008 at 7:05 am
BAS, you still dont realize that Trebert did not create this. Steve Ewing did this in Caronbonale, on a much smaller scale – this is fact – and that was long before he ever met Trebert – he taught Trebert.
March 26, 2008 at 7:12 am
My dear – I’m going to say something about SME that even YOU haven’t said…. Steve Ewing doesn’t have the skill, the knowledge, nor the intelligence to pull off everything that was done in this scheme. It took a lot more than Steve Ewing has… despite all his years of college!
March 26, 2008 at 7:48 am
Do you really need to reply to me in that way – whatever, makes you happy.
But you are so wrong. I know that this was done smaller scale in Carbondale, Illinois before he even knew that the other two existed. You may not want to believe that,
but I know that it is a fact.
March 26, 2008 at 7:58 am
According to Treberts testimony in court he has known Ewing since 1983.
March 26, 2008 at 1:56 pm
FAM… what you’re accusing Ewing of doing in Carbondale… was that proven in court? you say it’s fact… but i think it’s your opinion. and if it was going on and you knew it was going on in IL.. why didn’t YOU go to the authorities? maybe because you were reaping some benefit from it? maybe YOU didn’t want to lose the perks it added to YOUR life? you didn’t have the guts to blow the whistle?
seems like you were riding it all the way out.. and now that SME turned it all in… NOW is the time to choose to call him out as such a scheming person.
your stories or “facts” seem shady to me. and please don’t cry “DEFAMATION!!!”… it’s merely my opinion of your “facts” and YOUR innocence.. i wonder what we would find if you were pried open in court.
like chuck said.. what you generally are critical of is usually what you are critical of in yourself.
you wanna call SME such a bad man.. i only wish i could see your bones… i don’t think you’re any different. you just kept in the shadows until it was safe to come out. :/
March 26, 2008 at 2:12 pm
I am not the only one that has posted about Carbondale. Read. I am only stating my opinions and things that are public record. This is supposed to be about the three of them – I am a poster like all rest, albeit with a different view and experience than the rest of you. You know nothing about me and you have no reason to attack me that way.
By your behavior, I wonder if you are challenged perhaps? At any rate, read the postings -and stick to what Chuck has asked. I am a family member and I think you are just a casual although obviously angry observer. Stick to who was on trial, and grow up.
March 26, 2008 at 2:31 pm
With regard to postings concerning what may or may not have been previous business ventures of SME and or Gary Trebert.
Trebert, while testifying under oath says he has known Ewing since 1983.
There is nothing concerning Carbondale, IL in the indictment or anywhere in testimony. Please provide the location of record for the “things that are public record” you are referring to.
Thank you
March 26, 2008 at 2:32 pm
what about my posting would lead you to believe i’m angry? i’m merely an observer… as i observed you have not negated anything i’ve said. this blog is about the three men and the case. you have brought yourself into it the second you claimed your family was a victim of SME. now you’re apart of it. and now you are a topic of discussion.
and it’s obvious i hit home with some of my thoughts… perhaps there are a bit of truth to them since they’ve angered you enough to call me names… challenged? that’s mature. you can’t defend yourself. the fact is your are not a victim are you? but quite the opposite.
FAM i have read the entire bog.. you were the first one to say that SME was doing the same scheme in IL… that is fact. however you have not provided any proof or evidence that he did. your statements are flaky. you can’t back them up.. when someone asks you to.. you ignore them and call them “challenged”… that’s the behavior of a 5th grader. you can do better than that.
March 26, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Robert Burroughs said on the witness stand, under oath that he mowed the lawn at a nursiing home in Carbondale, Il. That is the only mention.
March 26, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Robert Burroughs also stated on the witness stand the date of his employment at nursiing home in Carbondale Illinois was in 1990.
March 26, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Kubrick I was not the one that mentioned Carbondale first, I dont think. I believe it was
Happy Face.(posted 3/23 at 7:13 om) Furthermore, while you may think I am the topic of discussion, I am not.
Read what CHuck has requested. There has been no proof or evidence provided here by anyone. It is all postings of thoughts and opinions, and while one says it is a fact, no one has cited any sources here specifically, I guess you need to re-read – I have not called anyone names. Only stated what I think and know.
Southern girl, what does my deceased brother’s testimony about Carbondale have to do with anything.?
March 26, 2008 at 3:14 pm
It is testimony of the trial of SME. You and happy face have brought up Carbondale, IL as if it’s important to this indictment/trial. The topic of this blog comment thread…. Witness testimony under oath is relevant. Doing my research i was able to find Robert Burroughs connected to Carbondale nursiing facility. No other mention in the indictment or in trial testimony. I’m stating fact based on the trial transcript and the fact that I was there. May I also mention that you have stated also being present at trial. The witnesses bare significant relevance to this blog topic as it pertains to the crimes.
March 26, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Kubrick
Just to let you know I am not angry with you in the least – I find your juvenile behavior slightly amusing and very disappointing.
March 26, 2008 at 3:26 pm
FAM if you would please…. what official source was provided to your previous statement “He stole the residents spending monies.”
Are you aware that the Resident Trust funds are not accessible by any person other than the administrator and or the facilities business manager?
I can certainly provide the link to the indictment for your reference and also to the state codes where the nursing home was located. The state has a monitor for these accounts that are audited often.
March 26, 2008 at 3:29 pm
firstly.. i believe southern girl was just stating the only thing documented about Carbondale is your brother’s testimony about mowing the lawn. So no one is quite sure why you’re bringing it up. Stick to the case right? Oh wait.. it wasn’t you.. it was happy face… (who in my first blog i’ve already mentioned there is an obvious connection between you two)… i wouldn’t doubt if it was one of your kids! but i sure hope not… for that would be sad to get your kids so wrapped up in this matter. in which case i would pity your child and you. they should be studying.
and actually.. there have been plenty of people through out this blog that have cited sources.. Southern Girl repeatedly quotes from the testimonies of the trial. perhaps it is you who should go back and read. for someone so caught up in it all.. you think you wouldn’t have to.. perhaps you’re only reading what you allow yourself to believe.
you’ve called me challenged.. you’ve made attacks on SME’s wife saying she was born in hell.. you may have forgotten that one.. it’s way way way up at the top. you contradict yourself. your challenge may be your lack of memory.
and you still haven’t negated anything i’ve said about you. have you no defense for yourself? what i’m doing is trying to find the validity of your opinions and accusations. it seems there is none since you don’t care to ever explain. your proof is what??… that happy face said it first? seriously?
March 26, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Southern girl, good for you that you are so well versed in nursing home management and procedure.
I would be very interested in the link you are speaking for –
While you are saying what is legal, etc. obviously it is not always the case.
March 26, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Kubrick, you are my opinions are my own. I dont have to explain anything to you.
Why dont you just stick to a discussion of the three – the intent of this blog?
Good luck to you.
March 26, 2008 at 3:41 pm
To FAM and happy face,
You both in previous posts state that you spoke with SME the night before trial began and/ or during the trial. Is that correct statements? Interesting that one of you also state not knowing the other.
March 26, 2008 at 3:48 pm
I am asking for your source for that statement about the resident monies by offering mine. Thank you for the compliment but I rely on legal fact, and public reference to such issues before making any statements that cannot be backed up.
For example…I would never claim that you were 19 yrs old without having fact to back that up. Just like you wouldn’t accuse another say, SME of a crime without having hard facts to back that up first.
March 26, 2008 at 3:55 pm
Southern girl, I dont know about more than you do about Happy Face. However I did speak with SME as a I stated – did you have a question?
March 26, 2008 at 4:07 pm
That has been several years ago, the early 90s as you mentioned when you brought my brother’s testifmony up – so I really dont know how one would access records that are from that time.
March 26, 2008 at 4:15 pm
FAM,
I have printed this out in it’s entirety and also have it printed out prior to any vicious comments being deleted by Mr Gallagher. His mailing address at FCI is public knowledge and thought he would appreciate some reading material. He may not be aware of who everyone commenting on here is, but by the factual statements that you and happy face both spoke with him, by process of elimination, he will recognize 2 people as well as myself.
March 26, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Thank you, but when you mentioned Carbondale as if there were also similar crime committed at this facility, I am asking for that source. Your brothers statement in court did not mention anything else about a Carbondale nursing home other than his own employment there, and certainly doesn’t mean that there is a connection but i did search for any connection to SME and a nursing home in IL. Also since you state that SME was the teacher and that he did it on a smaller scale at that facility before knowing Gary Trebert. That would be prior to 1983 wouldn’t it? I’m just confused and would appreciate your source of that information for further clarification.
March 26, 2008 at 4:23 pm
That is very thoughtful of you.
March 26, 2008 at 4:29 pm
You certainly seem rather obsessed with this SG – perhaps you are going to write a book, So in that respect my conversations with you are done.
March 26, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Yes indeed. There are so many positive statements he will no doubt be glad to read. Take your “vomits rainbows” statement. It’s interesting you say that because (sorry for the hearsay here) but someone mentioned to me recently that they were present when a sweet appreciative resident once told SME that he must poop ice cream! He had told the staff to make food available for residents during the night in case they got hungry and ice cream was their favorite. He also use to buy this same resident holiday socks. She loved him and managed to tell him she did as well.
March 26, 2008 at 4:40 pm
No book from me!
March 26, 2008 at 5:04 pm
see what happens southern girl? you back FAM into a corner.. and she will just ignore it. she just wants to throw her claims out there. and not discuss them. defeats the whole purpose of a blog really… makes you wonder why he/SHE is even here.
March 26, 2008 at 5:11 pm
So to happy face then, I ask you this question since you were first to the post about Carbondale, IL nursing home. FAM must believe in your statement by repeating it several times. Would you care to share with this blog your source to back up this statement of fact? Thank you so much.
March 26, 2008 at 5:16 pm
I agree and FAM doesn’t like answering questions that is for sure. Maybe FAM is disabled? FAM seems obsessed accusing others of that very thing.
March 26, 2008 at 6:06 pm
SG,
Does a nursing home in Carbondale, IL have issue here? I also heard about that statement about the ice cream. Too funny. That particular resident was/is a sweetheart. A victim of head trauma after a car accident. Her disability sure didn’t hinder her humor!
Sorry folks that this isn’t relating to the guilty ones or to the purpose of this blog. But for me it’s hearing these stories that heal me.
March 26, 2008 at 7:12 pm
I will not be discussing things that I feel are none of anyone’s business. However,
wonderful that those residents were well fed. Not the case in all of the homes.
Think of what you want of me. I have only been expressing my opinions and stating what I know. Like it or not I do not care. I have no reason to defend myself in any way to any of you. If you dont like me or my postings just skip them. Exercise your free will.
March 26, 2008 at 7:31 pm
I find it touching that SME could spend so much time and be so concerned with that
or resident. I am sure none of you know how often he visited his own elderly parent.
Too sad. (and lets not say short on funds, not enough time – all pathetic excuses)
March 26, 2008 at 8:36 pm
Repeating what Mr Gallagher has stated..do not say anything here that you would not say in a court of law.
I’ve been around SME’s parents a bunch of times. Nice people. They were always so glad to get away from IL and hang out with normal folks.
March 26, 2008 at 9:50 pm
May I ask how recently, JAD, you were around his parents?
March 26, 2008 at 9:54 pm
SG – the ice cream comment was so touching but very hard to believe if one truly knows very much about residents of a care facility.
March 27, 2008 at 7:18 am
Have you even been in a nursing home FAM? The residents are at their home… free to say whatever they want to.
March 27, 2008 at 7:32 am
Oh good grief, FAM. You remain so out of touch with reality. I’ve had relatives in nursing care facilities….. One played the piano every evening after dinner for the enjoyment of other residents. One relative spent several weeks in a nursing care facility, recovering from hip replacement surgery… using their rehab facilities. And that entire wing was filled with rehab patients who would be there for a limited time. One started a weekly bridge group. Do you think care facilities are only for the old, totally spent, dying souls?? I admit that care facilities can be… often are… quite depressing. But SME DID make a difference in those homes for “his old people.” Sorry you didn’t know that about him. Why have you switched your attitude on this blog from you knowing the facts that no one else knows… to …. “this is my opinion”?? And when others throw FACTS (and the source of those facts) back at you and fairly ask for the source of YOUR facts, you conveniently hide behind ….. “this is my opinion.” Well – when you first expressed yourself in this blog, everything was a FACT. And now you’re going with “it’s my opinion.” FAM/happy face…. Do you have a SOURCE for your “facts”????? Is your source a newspaper? the internet? conversation with the Feds? late night discussions between FAM and happy face? or that alleged presence in the courtroom?? It’s a reasonable question…. WHAT IS THE SOURCE FOR YOUR FACTS?? Or are you now saying EVERYTHING expressed here by you and happy face is YOUR OPINION? You keep disputing our facts with your opinion. We would like to discuss… or argue… facts with facts…. and you just don’t bring FACTS to the table. Opinion is cheap… easy to come by… easy to spew. Facts…. a whole different game. You better come to this table prepared because, where FACTS are concerned, you are in way over your head (and that’s MY OPINION!).
March 27, 2008 at 8:12 am
My my BAS you are certainly an angry creature – Good luck to you.
March 27, 2008 at 8:12 am
SG- why make that statement – that does not even make sense?
March 27, 2008 at 8:58 am
As BAS states, the long term care industry involves many different types of medical conditions and ages.
FAM you say “sg the ice cream comment was so touching but very hard to believe if one truly knows very much about residents of a care facility.”
In a nursing home or “care facility” the resident has rights. Because it is a medical facility with different levels of care, it is up to that residents physician first of all, nursing staff, care giver and dietary dept to determine the residents dietary requirements. Not all residents would have the ability to eat ice cream but to those that can and with the freedom to do so it’s certainly a blessing under those circumstances…. With regard to a resident making a comment, they are able to express themselves as they want. They are all unique individuals with unique humor.
March 27, 2008 at 9:01 am
FAM says, “I have only been expressing my opinions. Like it or not I do not care. I have no reason to defend myself in any way to any of you. If you dont like me or my postings just skip them. Exercise your free will.”
So basically everything you say is pure speculation and have no hint of truth to them. Therefore, we shouldn’t even bother reading them let alone talk about them. Thank you, FAM, that’s all i needed to know.
and BAS… when i was in high school years ago… i actually performed in a singing group that was commissioned by SME to perform at some of his nursing homes for the christmas holidays. we always had a blast as well as the residents. he definitely did make a difference.
March 27, 2008 at 9:09 am
I have not switched – I do have and do know many things most of you do not.
I know all about SME – so dont say you have me back in a corner and all of that other garbage you spew. Keep you your fan club and all of the rosy thoughts and all of the other things that you post. Dont care. I know the truth and one truth remains – he was the one convicted and will more than like never see the light of day outside of custody.
As I said, if you dont want like my posting, exercise your free will and dont read them.
March 27, 2008 at 9:16 am
SG – You are trying to argue something with me and that is not an argument.
Not once was anything about rights and all of that mentioned by me – all Americans have that rigth. And really I know far more about the nursing home industry than
most of you.
March 27, 2008 at 9:28 am
KUbrick do not put words in my mouth. I am both expressing my opinions, and stating things I know to be the truth. Quit trying to twist my words. Nothing I have posted has been speculation at all. Read my posting or not dont care.
By the way, while you were singing for those folks, do you have ice cream afterward while he vomited rainbows?
You dont know what type of person he is – how he went for YEARS and did not see his own parents – how he took his own elderly mother’s identity and did horrible things
with it – and Kubrick -check out the transcript on that if you want – I am sure SG has it.
March 27, 2008 at 9:51 am
FAM: I think it would be really interesting years from ow to see how convicting SME has improved YOUR life. He obviously had such a negative impact on your life…. I’m sure grand, wonderful things await you now that he is behind bars. I’m sure you have plans to move beyond all this… make a good, pleasant life for yourself… make a positive difference in this world. Might you want to share with us your positive plans to move ahead after this dreadfully long… long bad experience? From all your conversations, you certainly know what a bad example is, so you know what to avoid. We expect great things from you going forward! I can’t help but wonder though… with ALL this info that you know so much more about than anyone else, why have we not read about you in some publication? Why have we not seen you as some expert on one of these topics? Why do you not refer us to one of those documents/publications? I am sure that it is just an oversight because you have certainly impressed us with your indepth knowledge that you so willingly back up with sources of fact.
March 27, 2008 at 10:10 am
kubrick, I did community service for national honor society years ago at one of their nursing homes, bingo and sang songs etc. Soo much fun.
March 27, 2008 at 10:18 am
FAM – Why can you NOT understand…. “I am both expressing my opinions, and stating things I know to be the truth.” Until you provide a SOURCE for what you “know to be the truth,” you are expressing an OPINION! So far, you have done NOTHING but express your OPINION. There is nothing wrong with that… to a point… in this forum. But continuing to express your opinion, while trying to convince everyone here that it is the TRUTH, is not how you validate your point. There is a great deal of arguing on this blog because you will not provide SOURCES for your “facts.” FACTS with VALID sources cannot be argued…. hence all the argument here! We are arguing over your OPINION!
March 27, 2008 at 10:59 am
No.. no ice cream. As SG stated… not everyone’s diet could incorporate ice cream. but we did have sing-alongs. As for the vomiting of rainbows… i hope you realize that’s not possible for human beings to do. I wonder, FAM, are you challenged? Or possibly blogging from a mental hospital? I only ask this, not to defame your character, but that it doesn’t seem that you know the difference of what is reality and what is not. I wonder if all you say about SME’s character and wrong doings are as real as the ability to vomit rainbows. Thank you for giving us more insight into your character and mental awareness.
March 27, 2008 at 11:02 am
Good luck to you BAS – remember one who angers you controls you. Too funny.
Regardless of what you rainbow and ice cream folks think he is the one in prison and that is where he needs to be. Gee why dont you all start a Charlie Manson fan club while you are at it?
March 27, 2008 at 11:20 am
LOL – You’ve sent me enough good luck to last quite some time. Thank you! Is that what you’re trying to do?? Make everyone angry and keep them in your clutches so you can say you CONTROL them? Is that in your belief system? Is this something you read/study/practice? Of THIS, I’m sure you know more than I.
March 27, 2008 at 11:23 am
Kubrick, you surely must not be aware of what an “expression” is – but perhaps running about with that ice cream smile on your face – is what your problem is.
Keep up the good work – and what out for those rainbows. Oh, right, cant do that anymore as he is in custody – where he should have been along time ago.
You are the ones who dont know the reality of the situation – but like it or not he is in custody and justice is being served.
March 27, 2008 at 11:24 am
Bas, hopefully one day your postings will make some sense -
March 27, 2008 at 11:33 am
Vomiting rainbows… guess i’ve never heard that expression. Must be one that you only learn in special schools. And you say BAS’s posts do not make sense? I know this isn’t a comical blog… but your ability to contradict yourself does make me laugh.
by the way.. we’re still waiting on any documents or proof for what you call facts. Otherwise.. we’re still just reading opinions from a teenager who thinks “vomiting rainbows” is an expression.
Which is fine… it’s my free will that allows me to do so, right?
March 27, 2008 at 11:48 am
Kubrick please continue to express yourself – you are just too too funnny.
March 27, 2008 at 12:00 pm
As long as it leaves you with nothing to say but express myself… i will definitely do so. Aren’t you going to wish me luck?
March 27, 2008 at 12:22 pm
I can only say I hope you like SME gets exactly what they deserve. Perhaps some day you will realize that this saintly person had his own sister impersonated – how is that
measure up to all of the ice cream now?
March 27, 2008 at 12:23 pm
Kubrick – did it take you nine years to get through colllege as well?
March 27, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Don’t worry FAM… everyone gets what they deserve. Even people who choose to slander someone with empty claims.
And considering i have physical proof that ice cream does in fact exist… i’m sure it will hold up in court much longer than your unsupported claim about impersonating a sister. i would have loved to see a brother impersonate a sister, though… that must be one manly looking/sounding sister if he was successful.
You don’t stop talking about ice cream… You hate ice cream, too? Who hates ice cream?
March 27, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Kubrick, I do believe it was stated in court that he had his sister impersonated – that is a fact – and I am sure some one will correct me if I am wrong, but nevertheless
it has been stated here by someone other than me and is factual.
Your education is showing I did not say HE impersonated his sister, I said he had his sister impersonated.
I wish you all that you deserve.
March 27, 2008 at 1:12 pm
By the way JAD in re reading your postings- you are wrong the entire Burroughs family was not contacted by the Feds. Only the ones he had impersonated, etc. Not all of us.
Also JAD when was the last time you saw my grandparents?
March 27, 2008 at 1:39 pm
so you’re saying that his sister was impersonated.. and it wasn’t SME. but you BELIEVE it was SME that had it done… because… smiley face said it? that’s not proof FAM. “your education is showing”.. evidently you didn’t go to law school.
thank you for your wishes. i’m absolutely ready to receive the bounty i deserve.
March 27, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Kubrick, I am sorry but you must be dense. I have seen the evidence that he had his sister impersonated. Fact.
March 27, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Also Kubrick why would such a giver go by an alias?
March 27, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Also Kubrick he also did horrid things with his own elderly mother’s identity –
forgery and all of that – read read read – the internet is full of it. Do you think it is just ok to defraud the govt – have people impersonated – forgery – use an alias, and on and on and on – you think he is a good person because he had your group sing at a nursing home? you needs to grow up and get with the program.
March 27, 2008 at 3:47 pm
i’d be happy to read it. just give me the link please.. thanks.
March 27, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Kubrick type in Stephen Michael Ewing and there are many choices there –
you will have hours of reading.
March 27, 2008 at 4:44 pm
“Kubrick, I do believe it was stated in court that he had his sister impersonated”
Actually FAM…
1…………..Gary Treberts testimony said that SME did forge his sisters name on payroll checks which evidence showed to have occured in Jan and Feb 2004. Not so fast! Defense counsel did impeach that testimony of Mr Trebert. (he lied)
2…………..Testimony also showed that SME was not with any of those companies that foged her name after Dec 2003. He was cooperating with the govt at that time.
3…………..The Judge did ACQUIT (not guilty) SME of any counts and charges pertaining to 2004. Which revealed that the forgery was done by someone at Gary Treberts office because that is where payroll was done and records were kept.
4…………..At no time during the trial or any motions filed pretrial into evidence was SME’s sister mentioned as being impersonated. The forgery took place after SME blew the whistle… stated by more than one witness and perhaps impersonation took place then as well???? Maybe this is also a reason for blowing the whistle because of what was taking place with regard to his family in IL???? It was never mentioned in court as you stated.
March 27, 2008 at 4:45 pm
JAD, I am still waiting for answers to the questions I have asked and I have one more.
In re-reading that touching story about the resident SME apparently spent some time with I am wondering – why do you need to be healed – if I recall correctly you said you were not a witness or ………………………? Interesting.
I am sure that SME’s mother would have loved to have had a fraction of the time that he spent with the sweetheart. He went for years, sometimes no acknowledgement of her birthday, mothers day and sometimes even no Christmas. He is sure is one hell of a guy. Keep that fan club going -= he is a jewel. Wonder if there is a market for rainbows or ice cream in prison. (and lets not say he was too busy no money (ha)
whatever – times he would make plans to come, get her hopes up and at the last minutes decided to go to Vegas or some other such place. Great guy that SME.
March 27, 2008 at 5:06 pm
It seems that SME was able to ………..prevent……… other serious horrendous crimes that were being committed by coming forward doesn’t it? It’s proven court testimony that a lot was being done without his knowledge and out of his control. But yes, he was still found guilty of the conspiracy because he knew about it, maybe not all of it but enough to be found guilty. If you are guilty of the first count conspiracy then the jury was to find him guilty on all charges. Seems to me that Ms Burroughs could have had even more serious identity, forgery, IRS crimes against her if the scam was allowed to continue. Trebert, because he was in control, new company called CLC, he was president, had her named stamped on payroll checks totaling millions of dollars, to get back at SME for refusing to cooperate with him and because SME came forward and revealed the crimes beforehand…and at the time he was not aware of everything going on behind Treberts law firm doors. There is much more than forgery and impersonation. But as a result of coming forward he is facing the consequences.
I dont mean to direct this at FAM at all, but to the other readers interested in the facts, evidence and testimony at trial. It was a mess, a mess by a lot of people. Many people agreed to certain things some didn’t. SME did what he felt was right for him…to go to trial.
March 27, 2008 at 5:17 pm
FAM…why is it that you request JAD to respond to your questions when you refuse to answer to all of the commenter’s here that have asked of you? I will compile the list of responses that have been requested of you since March 16th. On second thought I’m not so sure anyone is honestly interested in anything else from you. Much better use of my skills and time spent elsewhere on actual facts. I may write a book too!
March 27, 2008 at 5:52 pm
I better call my mom before someone accuses me of neglecting her on a frickin blog.
(No offense to you and your blog Mr Gallagher)
March 27, 2008 at 10:47 pm
Southern girl, you are so clueless and you think you know what is what but you really dont. and ftw girl you surely must belong to a SMU sorority. Say what you might and think whatever, but the fact remains he is prison where he has needed to be for along time.
March 27, 2008 at 11:06 pm
SG -I am thinking you are one of those weird obsessed people – and perhaps your obsession is SME – must be – you are totally clueless – and freakly obsessed.
March 28, 2008 at 12:00 am
FAM – so you’re saying you haven’t found anything specifically on the internet backing your claims. thank you.. that’s all i needed to know. if you find something.. please let me know right away.
March 28, 2008 at 12:19 am
and FAM… who’s obsessed? you have doubled any one’s blog entries here. the sad part is… you STILL haven’t said anything of any validity. it seems not only are you obsessed with ice cream and rainbows.. which you’ve mentioned in about 10 different entries.. :/ i didn’t know this case was about either of those… but you’re obsessed with fabricating your own facts and STILL have not listed a SINGLE source. if this was court.. you would be laughed off the stand.
Southern Girl – from what you’ve stated.. clearly forgery of Ms. Burroughs took place AFTER Mr. Ewing left the company… why do you think FAM is so persistent on saying it was him?
and why do you think she doesn’t listen to any facts? at all? i’m sorry to say SG… i think you’re just wasting your time… FAM doesn’t seem to be in a reasonable state of mind. almost as if she is plugging her ears and repeating, “la la la la la”… once again.. behavior of a 5th grader.
brace yourself though… we’re about to be called obsessed, challenged, ice cream/rainbow lovers, clueless, sorority girl, and/or defamers! and yet another “fact” will yet again go unsupported.
March 28, 2008 at 6:54 am
None of you want to realize that SME is where he needs to be – apparently Kubrick is on eof those “privledged ” but dim ones that can not clearly see. Good luck to you.
Kubrick, you think he is such a saint – continue – and good luck in your dream world.
I dont have to explain or prove anything to any of you.
Southern girl – get over your obsession – the spouse may take offense.
Believe what you want – but why should it be taken as gospel because SG said that is what went on – all of you can rally around SME – but the fact remains he is where he needs to be – twist whatever you want however you want – you are nothing than
single track obsessives – you can not or wont see the truth – I along with the feds know what he did – and thank God he is where he needs to be -for a long time.
Justice is being served!
March 28, 2008 at 10:18 am
umm.. it’s not gospel.. she’s reading from the documented testimonies… do you know what that is FAM?
and thank you.. you wished me luck TWICE in ONE entry. I should have all i need now.
i guess that’s all there is. i tried for four days to let you prove your points and you ignored the chance every time. as an outsider, i don’t know if SME is a saint or not, but he definitely got caught in the middle of quite a web. whether you want to open your mind, FAM, or not… from the testimonies that have been quoted.. clearly the govt. was trying to pawn crimes on SME that happened at the company well after he left. and clearly they did not do a good job of it… for their case was left with so many holes… the defense rested when the prosecution did.
i know this is all way over your head, FAM, and you have this idea in your head of what actually happened. perhaps the govt. fed you everything you needed to hear to completely turn you. perhaps it wasn’t even that hard… because for some reason… you really just don’t like the guy. and that’s your free will. but i fear it’s absolutely distorted your perception of all the facts. and those are your opinions… we agree on that. everything you’ve stated in this blog is your opinion and what you think you know but can’t back up. and you’re happy that SME is in jail… good for you. but whether you want to believe it or not… it was said in court by the judge to the jury… if a man blows the whistle on a conspiracy… this is fact alone that he knew about it.. and would therefore be guilty of it.
who knows how long SME knew of it.. you surely don’t.. that’s clear. but it’s my opinion.. yes.. MY opinion, FAM… (it’s your free will not to read it.. right?) that he took the higher road in the end. Trebert and May took a guilty plea deal because they knew with out a doubt they could not prove innocence… obviously SME felt differently… and he lost on a technicality.
you don’t even realize the reason you have to try so hard to convince everyone that SME is a horrible man… is because you seem so angry when you say it. everything is so personal to you. and i’m sorry. but it makes you sound eccentric and a bit off the reservation.
but i’ve learned what i came to learn of the case. i had no idea it was going to be like this. it was quite a ride. not to sound like FAM… but i do wish the best of luck to SG and BAS. and that’s not just “an expression”… that’s genuine!
oh… and i wish you all that you deserve. hah.
goodbye.
March 29, 2008 at 1:32 am
Kubrick, you are one to be pitied. YOu dont know who I am, what I think -or anything at all beyojd your opinionated, dim little world. You are just too too funny and oh so laughable.
March 29, 2008 at 11:19 am
Passionate hatred gives meaning and purpose to an empty life.
March 30, 2008 at 10:25 am
While I have been out most of the week, I see that comments taken a turn for the worst in my opinion. However, in hopes that there still may be some redeeming value to this blog posting I am requesting your help.
I am speaking at a national conference next year – February 2009 – dealing with the effects that families and children experience as a result of the incarceration of a loved one.
Perhaps those who have posted here will answer the following questionS:
HOW HAS THE INCARCERATION OF YOUR LOVED ONE EFFECTED YOUR FAMILY?
IF YOU HAVE CHILDREN IN SCHOOL, WHAT AFFECT HAS IT HAD ON THEM?
HAS THE INCARCERATION HAD A FINANCIAL IMPACT ON YOUR FAMILY? IF SO IN WHAT WAY?
ANY OTHER COMMENTS:
Please note…ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS ONLY to my e-mail account: chuck@chuckgallagher.com.
I do not want any answers to be posted on this blog as I have the distinct feeling that it will further negative postings which prove to be less than helpful.
Your comments will not be shared with identity, rather I am accumulating responses so that I can provide helpful information at this national conference.
Thank you in advance.
Chuck
March 30, 2008 at 2:36 pm
I was a former employee of SME also and I think the ONLY victims here are the Residents/Employees of the homes he was responsible for. I personally saw residents go without daily essentials, such as medications,oxygen, medical supplies, and bare minimums on food. (As most vendors would cut him off only for him to go to another and another much as he did with his payroll companies!) Peanut Butter and Jelly sandwiches do not constitute a nutricious meal in my opinion! SME is not a wonderful GIVER as some have stated (guess he was giving to them) but he did give to HIS RESIDENTS, you know the ones that the State of Texas had entrusted him with! Not to mention the employees who will not be able to draw social security off the dollars that should have been paid in on their behalf that made it into SME’s pocket… therefore his hateful wife and children benefited from the dollars he was blatantly stealing from the residents of each home he was entrusted to. Someone asked earlier what happened to all of the residents in his homes…(the aftermath of SME in his homes is a book in itself) the STATE came in and took them over and operated them until someone more trustworthy could be obtained… some were closed down because repairs had not been kept up (as all the money was going into SME pocket) so they had to be shut down and those residents moved to other homes… have you ever relocated an 80 year old with Alzheimers? Not a very nice thing to do considering the circumstances… I worked at the corporate office and got to witness SME’s daily insanity and nothing could convince me the man was in his right mind… maybe he should have plead insanity versus “Whistle Blower” come on now he was covering his own rear end with that one… Point the finger at Trebert and May before it is pointed at him!
March 30, 2008 at 2:39 pm
I stand corrected HE DID NOT GIVE TO HIS RESIDENTS HE ONLY TOOK FROM THEM AND BENEFITED FROM THE DOLLARS HE WAS BEING PAID TO TAKE CARE OF THEM! Does no one get the fact that what ever amount was spent as SAK’s was meant to buy medications, food, provide basic essentials to the elderly.. Good Grief people get the whole picture…!
March 30, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Kubrick stated that the government tried to pawn crimes off on SME AFTER he left the company… sooo not true… as he(SME) kept up the same practices when he formed Foremost Care…AFTER the Trebert/ May turmoil he just continued on with his unethical business practices, intimidation, and other daily nonsense that all of us who worked for him endured on a daily basis.. Glad I had the sence to get out when I did.. Visiting with Ron Eddins was not what I call fun…
March 30, 2008 at 9:53 pm
I too worked at corporate. Interesting how people see things different ways. EMPII you also worked in the corp office, but if you recall May and Ewing started Foremost with the facilities that they got back from Trebert and what a disaster they were at that time. Yes trustess took over the facilities a year later, but you fail to mention that after a year of fighting Trebert in lawsuit after lawsuit, Trebert won and had all the facilities put into involuntary bankruptcy as major redecorating as well as major maintaince issues were being done. As someone stated above, try fighting an entire law firm of crooked attorneys who will not stop until their goal, which was to put Ewing and May out of business. Are you aware that we (corp employees) are still being sued by Trebert? I have an update on the suit if you want to know. I agree with your statement “Point the finger at Trebert and May before it’s pointed at him!” Trebert was a melglmaniac, wanted it all, including taking funds and trying to buy Hawaii airlines and a salvage shipyard iin B’ville? May or Ewing were never a part of those business and one reason why they got out. Instead of paying the taxes like Trebert said would happen the money started going to other ventures. I too visited with Mr Eddins as did hundreds. Wasn’t so bad if you told the truth.
Ewing didn’t get along with a lot of people that is for sure, but that’s business and it’s not personal. Don’t get them confused. Professionals know better.
EMPII what did you think about the corp office space? Imagine putting all those employees in that little office space. What a disaster that was! Ewing did have the biggest office space though, with the only private bathroom. All I’m saying is that the working conditions in the small space made it tough to succeed as well. Agree?
March 30, 2008 at 10:20 pm
Thank you EMP II- finally someone who sees it for what is was. I have seen the same things you are speaking about – I have spoken about this for some time – and I was telling to tell what my family went through because of SME. The people on the blog continually as you can tell, picked on me endlessly because I mentioned the SAKS
spending. Look I have no problem with spending money – when it is YOURS TO SPEND – something you worked for and did steal. None of that money was his to spend.
Nobody here save for happy face and myself thought of SME as anything other than a WONDERFUL giver, caretaker,etc. He was done this for years and finally he just went over the end and got it to the point it was. I tried to tell them in Carbondale that this same thing went on – nobody would deliver food without a cashiers check in advance, because he had given them sooooooooo many bad ones. And on and on and on – I am sure basically the same horrid things that you have experienced. It was just insantiy.
And yes that whistle blower is just a bunch of bull – he was trying to cover his own rear exactly – You have so got it right. SME unfortunately is related to me but he is truly where he has needed to be for some time. He stole the identities of some of our family
and did horrendous things with it – you would not believe what went on – the tremendous amount of stress that put us all under – you never knew what he had done
next – and I believe that was a contributing factor to my brother’s death, may he rest in peace. The feds have been wonderful to us – no harrassing no threats none of this stuff that the followers of SME have stated. Respectful and kind.
SME is in need of some serious help.And yes I totally agree about his hateful wife -
and those offspring of his – THIRTEEN years of SMU, sorority life, SAKs clothing,
BMWs, Cadillac escalades (same vehicle Tony Soprano drove by the way) all of that cost money – and no I am not jealous as some of this followers have claimed. IT IS
WRONG to obtain those things with money that does not belong to you. You all have tried to jump me, run me off, and belittle me – but EMPII and Happy Face, you have it right. Thank you so much for your posting.
March 30, 2008 at 10:44 pm
I must say again that it is sooooooooooo unfortunate that SME had to pay twice for the life style his hateful wife and offspring enjoyed. Once with someone else’s money
and probably with the rest of his life. Just does not seem right that they should not have to pay in one way or another COMMENT REMOVED AS IT SERVED NO PURPOSE AND IS IMFLAMATORY – CHUCK. However, in a way it must be a relief for SME to be away from her and her demanding ways.
March 31, 2008 at 2:15 pm
The point I was making in reference to Foremost Care is because he didnt run those buildings any better than he Trebert and May ran the ones before.. Dont tell me it was because being forced into bankrupcy… as of all the remodeling going on at the corporate offices.. you are referring to the ones in Euless right? I thought they were pretty nice expecially the conference room with the big nice leather couches etc.. Not bad for someone with no money to feed residents… How did you feel about having to check in with armed guards everytime you went to lunch or watch SME walk around the offices with a gun stuck down his pants due to his paranoia.. or the crazy biting dog that he kept for protection… The tense conditons and his crazy ranting and raving about Trebert is what made me leave…
March 31, 2008 at 2:39 pm
I’ve been around the dog and have never seen him bit anybody, and the police were hired because of threats to not only SME but to ALL employees by Trebert and his other attorneys and emps. The attorney defending the civil case suggested the protection. Trebert certainly played issue with SME’s ability or lack of to see that everyone hired was doing their job, particularly the accounting side that never could get it together. Oh well, it’s behind everyone now, he won’t be associated with any more facilities nor will Trebert and May.
March 31, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Maybe you should tell the lady that cleaned the offices that the dog didnt bite as he bit her twice!! and SME thought it was funny! You can say what you want but all SME was doing was protecting his own rear and didnt give a darn about anyone else.. and your right he will never be associated with another facility and thank goodness for our elderly folks!
March 31, 2008 at 3:31 pm
It seems as though FAM and smiley face have rallied together and formulated some more names in order to disparage Stephen Michael Ewing even further. You two must think you are really creative! However, it is plain to me that FAM nor smiley face have ever been apart of Mr. Ewing’s family. I would also suspect that these individuals knew exactly what was occurring and didn’t go to the authorities for fear of being caught as well. First of all, FAM is under the assumption that Mr. Ewing has been criminally active and scamming people for decades, having first began in Illinois. Then if this is the case, why did Mr. Ewing’s family continue to receive support and money from Stephen Ewing if he was such a horrible individual for all these years. I don’t believe it was FAM who went to the authorities first. I wonder why FAM didn’t tell the authorities what she believed was occurring. We know that Stephen Ewing purchased a home for his mother and sister to reside in (several homes), which eventually was trashed by his family in Illinois. He also gave his family in Illinois monthly spending monies so that they could eat and try to live out their lives in peace and harmony. COMMENT DELETED AS IT IS UNRELATED TO BLOG. Is that a scam? Certainly something to ponder…
March 31, 2008 at 4:13 pm
You are just too too funny Cindy.
March 31, 2008 at 4:29 pm
Reminds me, I do personal business with the individual who manages the home loan for property in Illinois. We were talking about other business last week and also talking about SME. That house in Il came up because the real estate agent had sent photos of the inside after the Burroughs bunch moved out because he had to sell it. They totally trashed it. Not only did SME make ALL the payments, insurance etc but now has to remodel and repair just to get it sold. Again having to pay twice….isn’t very nice.
March 31, 2008 at 4:50 pm
But back to the nursing homes, so many old bui;dings are being closed down so a new facility can be built in it’s place. Is everyone aware that the long term care industry is the most regulated industry and second is nuclear energy??
March 31, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Mr. Gallagher,
This will be my time to respond to a blog or for that matter read one, but this one is just making me ill.
I will respond to things, I have done personally or have withness being done or said to me.
I was a employee of Steve’s, yes Steve can get very angry and mad but that is only if you screw up and when I screwed up he got upset just like any employer would do. I did not leave on good terms but through a mutual friend Steve was constantly asking them how I was doing and if I was ok.
My child was in a horrible accident, after we returned from the hospital, I sent a email to all my friends including the Ewings to please pray for my child. The very first phone call (actually about 15 minutes after I sent the email) was from Steve and Teri. They cried with me and for me and my child. Called daily for updates on her condition. This is from a former employer who him and I did not leave on good terms.
I have personally spent a lot of money at Saks, you ask how I pay for it? My Saks credit card and paid interest.
My child goes to a prestigious university, how we pay for it? My child’s father and I went without to put money in savings to pay for her education.
1. I have personally federal expressed personal checks of Steve’s to his sister in Illinois and we sent them out about every 3 weeks or so.
2. On refinancing his mom’s house, the mortgage company contacted me about all the current charges on Mrs. Ewing’s credit cards and I went and told Steve he contacted his sister and with her on speaker phone I heard her say I thought after you paid them off in full I could go charge again.
3. I know he employed a nephew up in Illnois because he could not find a job, how I know this I spoke to him on numerous occasions on how to do his job.
4. The large dog in question was a teddy bear. He would actually climb in your lap, he thought he was a lap dog. Yes that large dog.
5. The security in question, all I can say they made me feel safe. I have personally seen pictures of me leaving the building and going into the building. That is creepy. I have witness people just off the property line taking pictures and writing down things in a notepad.
6. I did not attend the trial
7. I have lost a sibling and it hurts like hell to bury a sibling. My sibling died because of someone elses problem. to Fam, I am sorry for your loss.
8. My child has witness Steve having a good day and having a bad day and I was never worried about my child being around Steve and when I told her of the verdict she cried.
10. Trashing Steve’s family does not benefit no one. Whether the family member who posts on here received the funds that was sent, I do not know. I know the funds was sent because I personally took the envelopes to the Fed Ex box. Also I set up the insurance for Mrs. Ewing home and paid for the home owner’s insurance with Teri’s personal credit card. Also, I ordered furniture and such for Mrs. Ewing’s home and it was paid for with a personal credit card.
Steve would order things, his mother needs, being 93 you would know what they were, he would order from our supplier but would pay for the items with his personal credit card and have them directly ship to Illnois.
11. I was in Austin for a conference not to long ago and I spoke to the several different operators that took over Mr. Ewing’s homes and they all told me that the residents and employees had nothing but good things to say about Steve. If all employees and residents hated him why did they tell me this when they knew I worked for someone else and not Steve when the conference was taking place.
12. I dealt with one particular landlord of Steve’s and they have nothing but nice things to say about Steve.
13. There was nothing out of Austin that stated Steve could not manage a nursing home when I worked for him, matter of fact I received a letter to that fact.
14. I personally gave an employee a check from Steve to purchase her first home. Steve’s motto was eveyone should own a home.
15. Steve carrying a gun, so what, this is Texas tell me who does not carry a gun, especially the threats Steve received and the people watching the building, I would be a little worried to if I was a whistle blower I would be constantly watching my back.
16. My current boss drives a Mercedes. He pays for it out of his salary just like I pay for mine out of my salary, why is it a big deal that Steve owned a car. My child owns a car, why is that a big deal?
The worst thing people can do is take things out of context, many things blogged on here was taken out of context. What I have wrote is what I have witnessed or actually done.
My opinion, Steve trusted someone and got the short end of the stick, I have it done to me as well and it is no fun. Steve is someone I will always love and I know if he was not where he is today and I needed anything (I have not spoken to Steve in a while) or my child he would be the first there to help no matter what it was.
Please leave the personal insults to yourself, nothing will make you change your mind but including the children in the insults is just horrific, these children have enough to deal with right now without dealing with someone or some people trashing them.
God Bless.
March 31, 2008 at 5:59 pm
To JAD:
What do you mean the accounting side… I believe it was the accounting side that was trying to do the right thing by not committing Medicare and Mediciad fraud and when they did they were terminated! of course SME did do it himself he had his little HenchWomen from the Operating side that didnt know up from sickum about the Long Term Care World. And yes some of us who are still gainfully employeed byt he LTC World know exactly how heavily regulated it is… Maninly because of people the TREBERTS, MAYS AND EWINGS!
March 31, 2008 at 6:18 pm
I am sorry EMPII, but where did the fraud come in at Foremost? Steve is not charged with ANYTHING relating to Foremost Care. The reason people was terminated was due to poor work performance, pitting once side to another, things like that normal things in the business world that people are terminated for.
March 31, 2008 at 7:00 pm
I realize that this thread of comments shouldn’t apply to other businesses but I need to comment about foremost Care. Legal bills, maintance bills were astronomical. No company could have survived with the litigation that Trebert was throwing at us constantly. The accounting dept never could get an accurate P&L. It was always an issue with what accounting system to use. Mistakes were made, employees who said they had certain billing skills couldn’t do it or even keep up to a respectable pace with this business.
SME approved a sizeable loan to an employee because her little granddaughter needed major dental attention. The stress that family endured during that time because of financial and medical issues were rough and we all wanted to chip in and help. SME either loaned from his pocket or from company money. That employee quit shortly after receiving the money and never repaid the loan or even offered. Under the stress of running a business that was doomed from it’s conception, fighting lawyers and incompetent employees, he still managed to give to people that honestly needed it. Because he cared. Maybe not everyone, but if kids were involved he was there for them.
I too remember Treberts Jr attorneys stalking us from the top of the hill, taking photos of everyone coming and going so they wouldn’t leave anyone out of the civil suit. I was glad for the security and the dogs, not just the big one but a lot brought their dog to work. It was always bring your dog to work day there. also, Attorneys and Euless police told us to be concerned about Trebert, that he was unstable and unpredictable.
March 31, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Admin, you are so right about not getting a accurate reading of the company fiscal picture. I too remember an employee received a large loan for their grandchild and it was never paid back.
The company was doomed from its conception because of Trebert. Trebert did not want Foremost Care to succeed he would file petition after petition just so Steve would have to pay an attorney to fight the petition. As someone who had an attorney to attack them in court time and time again it is draining financially and you never recover. Steve had to constantly be fighting Trebert with all the petitions that was filed. I too was told by Steve’s attorney that Trebert was unstable and also was told by other attorneys as well.
March 31, 2008 at 8:03 pm
Everyone was always bringing their dogs, that was funny, I do not recall a day that I worked there that I did not hear from an employee at one of the buildings that did not having something nice to say and tell me to tell Steve thank you for something he did, like purchase a residents clothing or help pay for something out of his pocket that an employee or resident needed at the homes and let me tell you I never heard of anyone just eating PP&J. What Steve did that a lot of other operators copied he always had someone walking the halls with juice, sandwiches, fruit and cookies so all residents could have snacks and I have seen personally Steve mad because someone was not walking around pushing the “snack” cart. We were at the Hurst home and there is always a lady selling sodas and things at the fron (she was a resident) and everytime Steve went there he gave her a large bill. When I talked to her all she did was gush about the aviary, the garden and how good the food was.
March 31, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Ah yes…The Eden Home. How beautiful was that garden and pond with fish! The bird cages filled with singing birds and fish tanks on every hall. That was not an easy certification process. The administrator during that time was wonderful and responsible for many programs in that facility and then later implemented other programs into the other facilites. When the state took over, all trustees made the comment that there was never a care issue. Read the surveys online from that period of time people.
March 31, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Favorite,you seem to have a rosy picture of SME – but read what EMP has posted.
They have the right picutre. sure nice to throw money around at SAKS and problems
if it is not yours to begin with. And Favorite you really should stop your list. I heard some of those conversations and you are totally wrong. I checked the houses in Illinois and they were not “trashed” as you all seem to want to say. Apparently the spouse and offspring have been making up multiple names and posting. Do what you want but the facts are that he is prison where he should have been along time ago. Apparently you need to do your homework – you know nothing and are reallyh off the mark. He was doing this in Carbondale on a smaller scale. And CINDY why not just stick to the subject – you know you have posted some things here that you cant back up and are only guessing at – and that would certainly qualify as slander, defammation and lots of other things……..so stick to what you can cite souurces = but say what you will . EMP is right – the spouse and offpspring can make up hundreds of bogus names – hey they learned at his knee right – but the fact remains – he is in prison and probably from now on……justice is being served. The hateful spounse may have to give up her high lifestyle – and hey why some of you bogus posters are at it- why not bring up the inlaws and purchasing the father in law a new car and gave them a large amount and paid off the brother in laws credit cards and for a cremation I think – SME told me this himself.
March 31, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Oh yea FAVORITe – read your list – it is very easy to spend money that does not belong to you – obtained by fraudulent means – 34 million I think was his take-
it is so laughable – you do not have a clue- get in the real world – he was only covering his own self – or trying to – he took money from the govt. – obtained by fraudulent means. What is your problem – dont you realize he defrauded us all by doing that?
Not that it really matters what any of you followers of SME think – the fact remains he is where he should be – justice is being served.
March 31, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Oh and Cindy yes I am a family member – we lived in the same household for many years. I know all about him – including why he was discharged from the service.
Why he left the ministry, a nursing home in southern illinois, as well as the local lumber yard………much much going on there – you are so off the mark – the man truly does need help.
March 31, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Oh I’m sure he would share such personal issues with such a loving member of his family.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. No one is calling you a liar just understand there are different viewpoints and opinions. This blog is for intellectual discussions and not for your pleasure to call the Ewings everything in the book and then have them deleted by Mr Gallagher.
March 31, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Oh and fav and cindy – might check out who is really using my grandmothers credit card.
March 31, 2008 at 8:52 pm
There is a bit of difference in the names but with all the things that have been changed and abused – ……………….
March 31, 2008 at 9:28 pm
BLOG NOTICE: Several of you have suggested that this blog be closed. Frankly, however just when it seems that folks have lost interest, others post comments. The blog is open to comments.
I cannot however, monitor the comments. I have, when requested, tried to remove offensive comments when made. I will be unavailable to do so for the next week or so. Hence, may I offer these thoughts:
1. Make comments that are relevant to the issues related to Ewing, Trebert and May (white collar crime) – comments about family members are really unproductive.
2. If you find the comments inappropriate – then don’t make comments. Most of these seem to be fueled by a “West Virginia” feud – like the Hatfields and McCoys. When people let it go it will go. Do not feel the need to visit the blog or defend comments. They will die a slow death when folks – let it go.
3. Comments that would be welcome are answers to questions I have asked. It is interesting to note that most comments do not deal with issues related to what the commenters could have done to prevent the pain to all involved.
March 31, 2008 at 9:54 pm
I can assure you FAM, I have not seen Steve or anyone in the Ewing family for 2 years. I have no idea about you or your family trashing a home, I was not privy to that. I do know what conversations took place in my presence, which is what I said. I do not paint a rosy picture, I speak the truth to what I did personally and what conversations I was privy to, none of my statements are second hand or told thru a third party. As. Mr Gallagher pointed out this blog is for white collar crime, not to trash a family. Everyone including yourself have faults, Steve’s faults does not need to be aired out nor does yours. I believ what is told to me by a family member or someone in my family I could never turn on them and believe me if you knew my story you would state I would have every reason to and I have rose above that and would never publicly trash a family member.
As Mr. Gallagher pointed out what could have prevented this situation and as you say Steve did this 30 or more years ago why did you not get him help? If a family member of mine was doing something illegal or on the verge of breaking the law I would of sought help for them.
March 31, 2008 at 10:02 pm
By the way FAM, It was 34 million of unpaid taxes by all three of them is what the case was about not Steve taking 34 million, I am going by what the papers said and what Mr. Gallagher said at the beginning of this blog.
Steve elected to go to trial, and have his voice heard, as an American citizen you have the right to a trial, some pleaded guilty as Mr. Trebert, Mr May and Mr. Gallagher. What I would do in the same situation I do not know.
April 1, 2008 at 3:50 am
favorite, if you have not seen the Ewings in 2 yrs then you must have an excellent memory. Great for you. You nor any of you other followers of SME can not being to know
what the real truth is, but the facts remain he is in custody and will more than likely
spend the rest of his life in prison. Justice is being served. Whether or not you would like to realize it in your world, try though you might, some people will not accept the help they need – so you dont know the truth – and you have stated you believe what is told you by a family member – thought this was for facts -not heresay – I have stated what I KNOW to be the truth – EMP and Happy face have got it right – SME had issues long before he met his spouse, although we see how that turned out. And if you think so much of SME and he helped you so – why didnt you support him? Hmmm with friends like all of you, gee a guy could end up in prison.
April 1, 2008 at 3:57 am
JAD you are just too laughable -
April 1, 2008 at 7:46 am
Hello?? Just because you don’t physically see someone in a year or 2 doesn’t mean that you don’t or haven’t supported that someone.
April 1, 2008 at 7:48 am
Hello?? Just because you don’t physically see someone in a year or 2 doesn’t mean that you don’t or haven’t supported that someone.
April 1, 2008 at 7:58 am
FTW girl that is so true, we have been in contact by phone and such. I only know what I have heard with my own ears and I have done, I cannot speak about anything I have not seen or done.
April 1, 2008 at 9:13 am
Nestle USA is retiring the name of it’s popular candy bar, Butterfinger, to The Finger. If it’s true, this being April Fools Day and all, I’ll be handing them out on a regular basis.
April 1, 2008 at 9:27 am
JAD that is so funny!!!
April 1, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Just ran across this press release from the Dallas FBI dated Feb 28, 2008.
http://dallas.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel08/taxevasion022708.htm
“This case is one of the largest payroll tax fraud cases ever prosecuted in the U.S. Trebert admitted evading more than four billion dollars in payroll taxes—this is nothing short of egregious. Nursing homes should be safe havens for the elderly and vulnerable, not vehicles for criminals to commit fraud”, U.S. Attorney Richard B. Roper of the Northern District of Texas said.
4 BILLION……………….??? Could our government have made a false statement or JUST a mistake?
Perhaps Gary R. Trebert actually admit to this? The indictment states 34 million.
Interesting…
I would appreciate your comment about this when you return Mr Gallagher.
April 1, 2008 at 2:53 pm
FBI NEWS RELEASE: Southern Girl…I think it is a mis-statement or typo.
The comment you refer to is reprinted here: U.S. Attorney Roper said, “This case is the one of the largest payroll tax fraud cases ever prosecuted in the U.S. Mr. Trebert admitted evading more than four billion dollars in payroll taxes – this is nothing short of egregious. Nursing homes should be safe havens for the elderly and vulnerable, not vehicles for criminals to commit fraud.”
Later in the news release it states the exact amount which is “million” not BILLION. See the statement here: Trebert admitted that he and his coconspirators diverted to themselves and their personal activities substantial sums of money derived from their nursing home operations and from the non-payment of employees’ withheld payroll taxes. Trebert also admitted that in April 2004, he attempted to evade and defeat the assessment and payment of more than $4,113,000 in withholding taxes taken out of employees’ pay at 42 nursing homes he and his coconspirators controlled.
Glad to respond. You caught me in the airport so now off on a flight.
Chuck
April 1, 2008 at 3:18 pm
I also found the same exact press release quoted in other news media, with no correction….same inflated number. The 4 mil that is stated is from one quarter in 2004.
“Trebert also admitted that in April 2004, he attempted to evade and defeat the assessment and payment of more than $4,113,000 in withholding taxes taken out of employees’ pay at 42 nursing homes he and his coconspirators controlled.”
This is also a false statement by Trebert because SME was not a conspirator during that time. Judge Means acquitted SME on all counts of IRS taxes and conspiracy in 2004 because he was not involved. i do realize that this was proven after the date of press release.
Thank you for responding.
April 1, 2008 at 3:34 pm
I think this says you’d better beware in placing too much stock in what you read… whether it be a govt whitepaper, newspaper, online articles, etc. You’ll likely.. and easily… get duped! And sad part is, you’ll never really know it. People talk everyday about being suspicious of the govt… how they walk too thin a line between what is true and what isn’t (and we’re finding out they cross that line!). If I were to put out information in my work that contained an error or untruth, I would lose my credibility immediately. Wonder if the govt is considering a retraction or a simple correction of their statement? If this case is THAT big, someone else had to have caught that…. and who knows what else??
April 1, 2008 at 4:25 pm
How can the Feds make such a huge typo?? 4 Billion instead of 34 Million in the official press release? WOW.
Larry May had also left the companies after Jan 04. Was he guilty or not guilty of the April 04 quarter?
FYI, I had a paycheck from the quarter SME was acquited of in 2004. It was signed/stamped by Judith Burroughs as did all the employees during that time.
So Trebert plead guilty under oath that he and also his co-conspirators were in control during that time? That would be the un-indicted ones involved? Seems like he meant other conspirators, not SME or May and probably had to fess up to others involved. I don’t mean Judith Burroughs because it is mentioned that her signature was forged, but wouldn’t that be Treberts people, like Renfro or Head he was referring to? Maybe he didn’t lie SG?
April 1, 2008 at 5:21 pm
yeah, 901 clinic was a crazy place to work. i saw it rain lawsuits from trebert’s side. i heard about six-figure dollar-amounts paid to all the lawyers; i saw a tall female unable to fix the accounting, followed by a young black woman who was also unable to fix the accounting. we also switched computer programs and lots had to be manually transferred from what i remember. steve was a fair boss and would yell if you should be yelled at. he’d also tell you when you did a good job. i remember his paying for the casket and food at the funeral of a dietary worker in san marcos, who suddenly dropped dead. seems like she left a couple of children, but had no husband. her family was very poor. no one can change my mind about steve.
did anyone know that once, steve and his wife were sitting in a restaurant eating dinner and steve’s cell phone rang. he answered it, and one of trebert’s minions was on the other end, asking if steve’s steak was cooked the way he liked it or whatever. THAT is why the armed security was in place.
April 1, 2008 at 11:24 pm
I am curious iwuzthere,too remember it is soooooooooooo easy to pay for something if you have millions to throw around that dont belong to you. And do you really really believe that
story about the phone call about the steak? I am mean really – he was a drama mama,
and really needed help. Maybe he will get it now. And yes, if he is such a great giver,
and all of that happy stuff just why did he tell some people his name was Stephen Michaels?
April 1, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Yes I am curious as well – what is the answer to that one there, JAD?
April 1, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Why did he go by Stephen Michaels- JAD?
April 2, 2008 at 12:20 am
HMMMMMMMM Favorite – I think your list here is a bit off – for one thing Teri may have furniture on her personal credit card, and you say you ordered it, but none of it was ever put in my grandmother (Mrs. Ewing) home. Maybe Teri Ewing but not my grandmother. And better rethink your time when you sent any checks – I mean really 3 weeks – think again. And again, the credit card you are referencing a conversation about – well, that is a total lie, I was there and that was NOT said at all.
Also, Favorite SME begged my brother to work for him. in fact my brother quit a decent job here to do that. And now I know why – so dont spew all of these lies, here,Favorite ,
I know all about you and why you left on not so good terms. Shall I post that?
Perhaps you should rethink these things – and remember that just about any boss will fire someone for well, ……….you know. And so do I.
April 2, 2008 at 1:34 am
JAD you reallly need to get a grip – you need to stop your lies but hey – you were one of SME’s henchmen for years – but if you say you saw pictures and that the Illinois homes were trashed then you are a liar. I am so sick of you people trying to depict us as the bad ones.
Why not talk about SME’s in laws – as I stated before he personally told me he purchased his father in law a new cadillac, paid off his brother in laws credit cards (hey Favorite maybe that was the conversation you were thinking of) and sent his inlaws a monthly check because life there in their gated community cost a bit more than they had – and I do believe he paid for a cremation there – and much much more- No one wants to mention that because the spouse and spawn have mutliple names and wont do anything but lie,
as well as omit checks, vehicles, homes, and such to the spouse’s family. SME told me this himself. I guess they are angry that their world is coming to an end and I am so glad that my dear brother got to speak his piece. SME is where he needs to be.
Justice is being served. I am thinking American Express should starting checking identities a bit closer though.
April 2, 2008 at 2:58 am
Cynthia Martin – or is it Teresa maybe – no matter – you need to keep your mouth closed about things you KNOW nothing about. I dont appreciate your assumptions, slurs, and outright lies about my family. The house in Illinois was NOT trashed – whomever states that is a liar. I personally checked it and it was not trashed – and another thing CYNTHIA you have stated in several postings several times that my deceased brother RObert Brent Burroughs perjured himself. THat is not true. That might be YOUR opinion, but unless it is a fact, dont state it as if it were. Shame on you for attacking him in that way. You are a self righteous,lie spewing poor excuse for a human being, and if you are a part of the (semi)organized crime ring here – and yes obviously it was organized to a degree and they have been convicted of a crime I hope they have a tap on your phone and are watching you as I am sure they are watching the spouse and spawn. Their lifestyle will soon come to an end – no more using monies that should have paid for food and medication and payroll taxes for trips, and purses, and 13 years of college, and sororities and luxury stores. If you have earned it fine,
if you can charge it and pay with earned funds – fine – but it is WRONG people to fraudulently obtain money and carelessly throw it around.What is your problem – you all talk about SME as if he were the second coming – I have known him all my life and he is a person with many many deep seated problems. I am sure he will be in prison for the rest of his life – and maybe he will get the help he needs. Justice will be served.
Wonder how the riches will be deposed of this time – I truly hope he, and his spouse and spawn get what they deserve. I am so glad my brother got to say his piece – and there were many more waiting to take the stand. You are a disgrace to the human race.
April 2, 2008 at 3:10 am
and well can any of you answer why Stephen Michael Ewing went by Stephen Michaels –
and when asked said he did not know? Is he that far out now?
April 2, 2008 at 7:04 am
To the Ewing family – I am so sorry you have had this family element in your lives for so many years. How any of you kept your sanity, I have no idea. I have known of this family over the years…. fortunately, most of them are not like this… only a couple that participate in this blog…. and even the rest of the IL family has not had a great deal to do with this element (and vice versa, I might add). If I didn’t feel sorry for the Ewings before, I sure do now. If I didn’t respect them before, I sure do now. I bet the prosecution is even unhappy that they uncovered this one! Don’t you wonder why FAM and happy face know SO much, but were never invited to TX to testify? Of course you do! The govt couldn’t have this “star witness” appear before the jury and totally throw their case. It’s really kind of funny…. FAM and happy face just don’t realize how strong a case they make FOR SME. They don’t get it. So they keep making the case stronger and stronger for SME through everything they write here. I hate to tip the hand that they are playing right into someone’s gameplan. But if they didn’t say anything more, everything that is needed has already been said here. There are those who KNOW how FAM and happy will respond… and they keep leading… and FAM/happy face keep following. In some cases you can lead a horse to water AND make it drink! This is great stuff! This is GREAT stuff! And they still don’t get it…!!
April 2, 2008 at 8:16 am
Fam,
This is my last post, I do not care if you know who I am, I was not terminated, so sorry to disappoint.
If you thought SME was so bad, why did anyone in your family have anything to do with him or his family.
You are bitter and sad, I am sorry you have to live your life that way.
April 2, 2008 at 9:56 am
.
April 2, 2008 at 11:15 am
Thank you Admin for that perspective. Certainly something to consider, although the official press release by the FBI wouldn’t mention the unindicted co-conspirators. Prior to trial of SME or Trebert that info was filed under seal and only was revealed during the trial. 1 week prior to SME’s trial Trebert pled if you recall. It’s only my opinion but the names were filed under seal for fear of Trebert retaliation. They worked directly for him. This is trial testimony.
April 2, 2008 at 11:36 am
BAS you are soo laughable.
April 2, 2008 at 12:46 pm
I agree with you on all issues, FTW Girl. And on this….. Why would it be necessary to sensationalize ANY of this?? Why would the govt post 4 BILLION and leave it there without correcting it? What untruthful pupose is their end? Are they baiting readers? How else might they be baiting people they want to get to??
SG: I am very much aware that Trebert was a serious threat… in addition to the serious harrassments. But the more I learn about him…… the crazier he sounds… no, the more unbelievable! If you weren’t involved in that first hand, you’d never believe that someone would go to these lengths…. and all because SME blew the whistle?? Then why wouldn’t Trebert just go to court like anyone else who had nothing to hide? Why would you have to go to such lengths to ruin families if you were not the real culprit of the illegal deeds?? I mean, this man has guilty written all over him! And he’s probably going to get 8 yrs in prison?? My mind is racing with things I probably shouldn’t write here… now… but it brings me back to something a LONG time ago in this blog…. In Fed court, is it common procedure/practice for the prosecution to write the instructions the Judge reads to the jury?? Then the prosecution/Feds have closing statements…… then the Defense (SME)…. then the prosecution again. I KNOW that’s how Fed court works, but I’m amazed that the cards are stacked against you before you show up in Fed court to defend yourself. Why couldn’t SME have pled like the others??? why? SME was probably looking for the “safe haven” of confinement… silly as that sounds (I couldn’t know this man’s mind at this point!). However, I don’t think he was expecting to be taken into custody at the moment he was found guilty. Is there anyway for us to know WHY the Judge decided that? Is that something that can be discussed here and now… before sentencing? It seems that a trial is to clear up so many issues… it’s where truth and justice reign…. Why are there STILL so many more questions?? Just who is sitting on all the truths? Sorry – a lot of rhetorical questions. I don’t expect any answers. But something just isn’t right about all this…. And there’s a lot of hate spewing around because there are still so many secrets.
April 2, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Gee FTW girl I looked at the pics of the home on the internet and gee does not look trashed to me.
April 2, 2008 at 2:03 pm
I have attempted to discuss the facts of this crime from the perspective of actually being in the courtroom during testimony and sharing the facts and evidence from the alternative legal sources. But all these comments have been overshadowed by constant negativity and personal hatefulness to those that may be seeking some sort of healing here. I no longer will be commenting or even reading. It has totally lost its credibility and focus… that would be my opinion. Thank you to Chuck Gallagher for providing the opportunity.
April 2, 2008 at 2:05 pm
smichaels – Where are those pics?
(Why is your name so “funny suspicious?”)
April 2, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Interesting because the link from earlier did not go to any photos. I believe he said that photos would be published on a public website this week. There were statements from professional real estate persons that the home had major cleanliness issues, foul odors from dead animals and badly stained carpets. Junk in the garage. Ewww!
April 2, 2008 at 2:14 pm
SG: If you are leaving this blog, there is no reason for me to stay. You were our source of FACT. I don’t want to throw around dirty laundry. If you leave, that’s what will surely happen. Good luck to you and your family. Thank you for keeping the high road here!
April 2, 2008 at 5:21 pm
Comments to this blog posting have been suspended.
For those who are interested in a different perspective see my most recent posting:
http://chuckgallagher.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/white-collar-crime-the-aftermath-for-families-ewing-trebert-and-may-how-can-healing-occur/
May 3, 2008 at 9:18 pm
Since May has now been sentenced, comments are re-open.
May 15, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Please provide us an update:
What happened to the Foremost employee(s) sued by Ewing?
What happened in the lawsuit(s) brought by the vendors of the nursing facilities left unpaid?
What happened to Trebert lawyers Renfro and Finley, who were suspected to be under investigation by the feds, too?
Has the government paid any unindicted whistleblowers?
May 15, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Foremost employees were sued by Trebert, not Ewing, and that case has been abated about to be dismissed. There was one employee CZ who was sued by Foremost Inc because she stole bank statements and records. It was settled or dropped.
Renfro cut a deal and got out of the indictment. Finley has his own firm with Renfro. They are still a couple. Looking at their cases, they seem to be struggling. Finley has sued his mortgage company in attempt to stay the foreclosure of his home.
June 18, 2008 at 6:05 pm
I know much more about this than probably any poster on here as I was immersed in the details of one of these defendents. The whole truth certainly did not get reported by the media or either side of the aisle. One of these guys was pretty much railroaded, but not for crimes that are as stipulated, but for making very poor choices and not following through on taking very crucial advice. It is really sad that he had to be dealing with the other two individuals, because if you followed the money trail, it was most definitely pointing to two of the three that were committing these crimes. This other guy was just foolish enough to hook up with two thieves without a conscience.
June 27, 2008 at 9:49 am
I have been well acquainted with all of this having appeared before the Grand Jury and having multiple meetings with the Feds. I think that Anonymous is right in that one of the Defendants was a “pawn” (my word) in so many ways. But he screwed up in testifying. He offered cooperation and then blew it. BUT what I discovered was that Ewing had been doing this before he ever met May or Trebert. He has IRS Liens and Texas Corporations going back before 1983. Thats before he ever made the acquintence of either of his co-defendants.
Ewing clearly has mental issues. He should have cut a deal and pled guilty. He took a chance and lost. Now he faces PRISON time. Hard time. The other two will be in “camps” which they also deserve.
June 30, 2008 at 9:58 am
What is dreadfully disgusting is that when a defendant “cooperates,” that means he lies while under oath for the prosecution. Gary Trebert sat on the stand and said everything was Ewings doing. That Trebert didn’t make a move on anything without Ewing approving it all. That Ewing was in charge of everything…even legal! Anyone involved would know this was all lies. Trebert was given raving downward departure from the Feds because of this “cooperation” May cooperated by telling the truth…The real truth ….knowing the consequences of not providing Eddins with the “cooperated” truth as requested. The Govt gave May a weak downward departure. The system is so screwed up. It’s scarry.
The info “Well Acquainted “states about Ewing doing this prior to 1983 is incorrect. He was not in the nursing business until his family moved to Texas in 1985 when he began to work for Jewell Enterprises in Arlington. And then, he was only an employee who made no decisions on taxes, aquisitions etc. He met Trebert there who was the Jewells attorney and the Jewell brothers were eventually charged with numerous fraud and wrong doing. Trebert had been working in the Long Term Care industry for years prior to 1983. This was also not his first Federal Indictment.
May is spending the next 4 yrs at a maximum security transition facility in OKC. It is not a camp by any means. A search on the Fed Bureau of Prisons website reveals his location. He is now an inmate employee at that facility.
June 30, 2008 at 9:05 pm
With regard to the “pawn”, What pawn would knowingly fly 941’s to the UK specifically to mail them back to the states. He knew what he was doing and that it was illegal. Right? Is it possible that his attorney Gary Trebert told him that it wasn’t illegal? I also know that it is not illegal NOT to pay 941’s. Remember May and Ewing both went to the authorities and in fact May wore a wire and recorded conversations between himself and Trebert knowing very well that Trebert had firearms in his office. Yet the Govt indicted their very own informant?? I think May and Ewing both had mental issues ever believing that doing the right thing would be a positive move.
Thankfully Richard Roper will be job hunting next November. This is the most arrogant, crooked prosecution/justice system ever that this district has ever seen.
July 28, 2008 at 9:45 pm
First, Steve Ewing has been not paying payroll taxes since 1982. I know this for a fact. Look at the property records for Tarrant County for Stephen Ewing and Terri Ewing. Those tax penalties are for responsible parties of corporate entities that willfully did not pay payroll taxes. AND he did it again AFTER he split from Trebert, look at the property records in Tarrant County online for Foremost Care and Cura Management, both Ewing Controlled. It is most certainly illegal to withhold employee taxes and not pay them to the government. Look at the Tax Code. According to the government filing, May cooperated initially, but changed his testimony at trial. He was sentenced to 4 years, thereby giving him a Prison Camp. He self-reported to Oklahoma, which is not only a transfer facility but a medical one. Since he has been complaining about his back for a million years, that is probably why he is there. Steve Ewing was read his rights when he “informed” on Trebert and he talked anyway. He’s a freaking idiot. They told him HE was under investigation (look at the filings online). ALSO, if you think Ewing didn’t stash money, how is he paying his fourth set of lawyers. The bunch he is using now is high dollar.
July 28, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Smith, you are too dumb for words. You have no clue. GARY TREBERT IS AN HONEST STAND UP GUY! He was my attorney,I will and have stood by him and believe him and in him. I’m so sick of reading this crap from obvious losers like yourself that has no clue what this case was really about. Get the facts straight. Your boys May & Ewing are guilty. The only thing Trebert was guilty of was being stupid enough to be their attorney. Come on why would Trebert risk everything he spent years building to be part of the May/Ewing scam. Trebert is well thought of, loved in the health care industry and lived a very modest life taking care of his family and those that needed his help. Go get a life and/or a job and quit trying o put down a good man that lost it all because he fell for these crooks and did the only thing he could and that was tell the prosecution the truth and what he did know. TREBERT IS INNOCENT……………
July 29, 2008 at 7:32 pm
Just Curious…
Ewing and his wife married in St Louis Missouri in 1980, lived in Illinois until 1985 then they moved to Texas and were not home owners until 1990’s.
August 6, 2008 at 10:28 am
I have read all your comments and then did some research. Found out Ewing was sentenced to 120 months. 10 years. Trebert will be sentenced on August 11 at 9:30 am.
Perhaps all of us will gain insight at that time.
August 7, 2008 at 8:55 am
Will anyone ever know the entire truth? I can’t say. But what I can say is that every single time I dealt with Trebert he was fair and honest. Kept his word and always did the right thing. I had dealings with Ewing and I can’t say that about him. In fact, it would be jsut the opposite. He was dishonest with me. Lied to me. And worse, he had no remorse. May seemed always to stay neutral but he is far from innocent! I read above that Ewing has been stealing from the government and his employees by not paying his employee withholding taxes and by not paying the FUTA since the early 80’s. Thats a shame. It shows me that Ewing doped Trebert and May into his nest.
There are many out there who owe a debt of gratitude to Trebert. They know who they are. Many wrote letters in support of Trebert to Judge Means. The greater majority of those were glowing. ALL of them were honest and from the heart. It will be a sad day for me and for others when Trebert is sentenced. I PRAY that Judge Means has seen threw all the bull crap that Ewing has laid out when he sentences Trebert. I also hope that the United States Attorney again goes after Ewing both for lying to Federal Agents and for his actions when he was Foremost Care. He ran Foremost Care and never paid the taxes to the government that he withheld from all of his employees. That is a new crime and one I think he and his wife should be indicted for!!!!
August 7, 2008 at 11:11 am
Dear Smith,
I don’t know when Ewing and his wife married. He worked in Texas in 1982 for the Jewell Brothers Nursing Homes. He had his own homes after the Jewells closed and he has had liens at every single home he ever ran, that I can see, including the one he ran from a long distance in Illinois and in California.
August 8, 2008 at 10:47 am
Justcurious,
You are still mistaken on your year. I knew Ewing and his wife when they moved to Texas in 1985. They were pregnant with their daughter who is now 23 when he began to work for the Jewells. You may be looking at 1992 if that helps.
Not that it matters…
There are many persons lives that have benn affected by Trebert, Ewing and May. I am mostly concerned for their families and more importantly their children. The rest of us can certainly put this mess behind us and move on with life.
August 8, 2008 at 11:20 am
I also feel it a crime that all 3 brought their immediate families into the business. You mention Ewings wife. I know that May used his mother, his cousins business in the UK and Trebert has his son Joshua listed as President of many sham corporations as well as his brother in law. SOS search tells us a lot about the chain of command in their organization based on directors and management. Many many corporations where Trebert and or his son are listed as directors/President.
August 14, 2008 at 3:02 am
Ewing was in the nursing home business many many years ago, in a very small podunk nursing home – long before he met his wife – he has a long history of deceit. Back in the late 70s in fact.
August 14, 2008 at 7:56 am
Dont anyone think for a nano second that Terri Ewing did not know what was going on.
I hope the next thing is her sentencing – she should be accountable for her actions as well. She certainly can sign some names.
August 14, 2008 at 11:14 am
Dont ever think that Ewing’s wife and May’s mother were in the dark about any of this.
I hope and pray that there is more to come regarding Foremost – many many more were involved and should have to answer for this. While those three were the top dogs so to speak, they had quite a little organized crime thing going on. I certainly think those three should be accountable and have to pay but so should the wife of Ewing and the mother of May.
August 14, 2008 at 11:27 am
Some of you are stating that Ewing used his wife – she worked in the office, totally knew what was going on and should be held accountable just as much as Steve.
There is so much more than what you people know – and it is really sad – at one time Steve Ewing was a young man with much promise – he was the only son and was truly doted on – his parents came from modest means but all they did all they could for him – Eight years at SIU and no graduation – he was a chemistry major at one time and that does take some intelligence – all wasted – he does have some mental issues and perhaps he can get the help he so desperately needs. By the way any of you know how this Stewart McCray is involved?
August 14, 2008 at 1:24 pm
More than Steve Ewing should be accountable – does anyone know any more about the Foremost Care and those things? Teri Ewing and Joyce May were the “heads” of that – on paper anyway – they should be accountable as much as anyone. From the day Ewing met her she expected a grandiose lifestyle and sad to say I believe that was what was a driving factor in this for him anyway. Wonder how long she will stay with hiim once he is in custody – might make your head spin.
August 14, 2008 at 2:28 pm
I have known the Ewings for many years. Wonder how long they will stay together after Steve is in custody? Does anyone know any new information about Foremost Care?
August 14, 2008 at 2:30 pm
I would certainly have a tendancy to agree with those of you who question why Trebert would risk it all to do something like this.
August 14, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Phoenix, you are so right when you say that Ewing shows no remorse. I hope he get the help he needs. I believe it has been mentioned somewhere that he was an administrator – but that is not true – in fact to my knowledge he had no credentials at all to take over these homes. It is indeed a sad situation – his family in Illinois suffered the loss of a family member – in fact the only one of the three family members from Illinois that did actually testify. A very courageous fine fellow – Robert Brent Burroughs – may he rest in peace. It is my understanding that many people did not get to take the stand against Ewing. The man clearly has mental health issues – wanting to tell his story – which to my knowledge he never did – why in the world didnt he do something to save himself? He has brought much sorrow, shame and embarrassment on his family.
August 14, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Smith, I dont pretend to know how you get your information on Ewing, but he presented himself as having administrator’s credential in the late 70s – when in fact he never graduated from SIU – after eight long years of it. His parents were hard working people and tried to help him in every way – I am glad that neither one of them are aware of this. Regardless of what they do, everyone is someone’s baby and believe me his family has suffered tremendously. In fact they did lose a dear family member – the only one that testified at the trial – a courageous man by the name of Robert Brent Burroughs. It was a huge loss – I can not imagine why any body would put there family through the sorrow grief and shame that Steve Ewing has. It is unconscionable. May dear Brent rest is peace he is mega missed – the loss of a son, a brother, a father and friend. Most of you have no idea what the family has been put through and is still going though. All for what – to keep people in the lifestyle they think they deserve – $1500 purses and jewelry from Tiffanys – breast implants and expensive dentistry – Cadillac Escalades and BMWs? Lengthy SMU educations and sororities? For shame – Steve will have a long time to think this out – and life will not be so grand there. I pray that he especially gets all he deserves.
August 16, 2008 at 8:26 pm
Why would anyone be interested in Foremost Care? Nothing illegal took place there. It is bankrupt and all debt discharged. No lawsuits or judgements. Treberts company CLC just had a 21 million jury judgement against him, his corporation and it’s medical director for wrongful death. The family was at Treberts sentencing but the Judge would not allow them to speak.
August 16, 2008 at 8:42 pm
It never ceases to amaze me just how callous people can quickly become when trying to make a coherent remark on the death of somebody they likely never knew at all. At the bottom line of stories like this one is the simple fact that “tort reform” was ALL about saving money for those who already have money… a way to allow them to keep it, no matter what harm they may have brought to others.
August 18, 2008 at 9:52 am
In the wake of state laws that opened the door to lawsuits against poor care in the 1980s, nursing homes have been beset by litigation that threatens to sap the financial strength of the industry.
Tort reform in nursing home litigation is desirable because the current tort regime imposes costs on the long-term care industry, while providing questionable benefits to patient care. Nursing home malpractice costs have risen sharply both because of the number of lawsuits filed and the size of the damages awarded by juries.