ANTOINETTE HODGSON was recently sentenced in Manhattan federal court to six years in prison for running a $50 million real estate Ponzi scheme that fraudulently solicited investments from over 20 New York and New Jersey investors. HODGSON operated the scam between 2006 and her arrest in early 2010, tricking investors into providing money to her for purported investments in real estate when, in fact, HODGSON was simply using the money to pay off other investors in the scheme and to enrich herself and her family members. HODGSON previously pled guilty on September 14, 2010, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of wire fraud. The sentence was imposed by U.S. District Judge ROBERT W. SWEET.
STOP…BUT I’M CONFUSED…
I just reported on that a judge sentenced a southern Indiana church financier, former pastor Vaughn Reeves to 54 years in prison Tuesday for pocketing millions of dollars that investors believed would be used to build churches. Special Judge Dena Martin sentenced Reeves to consecutive six-year terms for each of the nine fraud counts, which alleged that he victimized about 2,900 investors who lost a total of $13.1 million.
Manhattan U.S. Attorney PREET BHARARA said: “Through her massive Ponzi scheme built on the false promise of large returns, Antoinette Hodgson destroyed the financial security of dozens of people, all so that she could live a comfortable life and indulge a penchant for gambling, using other people’s money. The substantial sentence imposed on her sends yet another message that such conduct will be punished severely.”
HODGSON steals $50 million and gets 6 years while REEVES defrauds folks out of $13 million and gets 54 years. What gives here. Either REEVES got screwed or the judge in the HODGSON case lacks the balls to hand out a “substantial sentence.” Which do you think it is?
According to the FBI News Release:
HODGSON solicited tens of millions of dollars from investors in New York and New Jersey on the false pretense that she would use the investors’ money to purchase and/or renovate residential real estate properties, and then re-sell the properties to third party buyers or rent them for a period of time before re-selling them. HODGSON promised investors high rates of return on their investments, which she represented was based on the profits generated by her successful real estate business.
In fact, however, HODGSON, misappropriated tens of millions of dollars of investors’ funds, and used those funds to repay other investors or for her own purposes. Between 2006 and 2009, HODGSON solicited approximately $50 million from investors who understood, based on HODGSON’s representations, that they were investing in her real estate business. During the same period, HODGSON only spent approximately $6 million on residential real estate, and made less than approximately $700,000 profit on sales of her properties. Most of the $50 million she received from investors was immediately used to repay other investors, in the pattern of a classic Ponzi scheme.
HODGSON used some of the investor money to enrich herself and her family members. HODGSON spent hundreds of thousands of dollars at casinos in Atlantic City and Las Vegas, invested over $700,000 in a Dunkin Donuts franchise in Arizona, and gave tens of thousands of dollars to friends and family members.
In addition to the prison term, Judge SWEET imposed an order of forfeiture in the amount of $45,000,000, and is expected to impose an order of restitution exceeding $17 million once victim losses have been fully accounted for.
While HODGSON’S crime is quite large, do you think HODGSON’S sentence is “SUBSTANTIAL”?
YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME!