Sujata “Sue” Sachdeva pleads not guilty by reason of a “Spending Disorder?”

February 4, 2010

With her attorney again signaling that he will mount a mental-illness defense, a former Koss Corp. executive pleaded not guilty Friday to accusations that she embezzled $31 million from her longtime employer.

Sujata “Sue” Sachdeva, 46, of Mequon, Wisconsin, pleaded not guilty yesterday to charges she embezzled as much as $31 million from Koss Corporation, a publicly traded head phone manufacturer where she had been employed as Vice President of Finance, Secretary, and Principal Accounting Officer. According to the indictment, Sachdeva authorized numerous massive wire transfers of funds from company bank accounts to pay for her American Express credit card bills and obtained cashier’s checks to pay for personal expenses, among other things. The scheme dates back to at least 2004, according to reports.

Michael F. Hart, her Attorney, said in a brief interview, “As this case proceeds . . . we intend to show that Ms. Sachdeva’s mental and emotional health played a significant role in her conduct.”

Asked whether that was the basis for Friday’s not guilty plea, Hart declined additional comment. Later, he issued a statement reiterating his remarks in the interview and added, “This is the beginning of an ongoing process, and our focus will be on the arguments we make in court. However, the issues of Ms. Sachdeva’s mental and emotional health are essential to this case.”

In court, Hart agreed to a new condition of release requested by prosecutors that prevents Sachdeva from disposing of assets that might be confiscated if she is convicted. According to the indictment, the government will attempt to seize her $800,000 Mequon home, her 2007 Mercedes Benz E350, a Hawaiian vacation timeshare and other assets if she is convicted.

The U.S. Marshals Service also is working to inventory approximately 22,000 items FBI agents gathered at the Sachdeva home and from local luxury stores and resale shops.

Several stores kept paid-for clothing in their storerooms for Sachdeva. She also sold thousands of dollars’ worth of merchandise through local resale shops, according to several retailers.  The government expects to sell the items, probably in an online auction, and return the proceeds to Koss.

Sachdeva also was ordered Friday to refrain from using alcohol and to submit to drug and alcohol testing.

If Sachdeva is convicted, she faces up to 120 years in prison plus fines, restitution and forfeiture of merchandise.

Her trial is scheduled for April 19th.

COMMENTARY:

I know there is a vast difference, but Sachdeva’s defense is a bit like the fellow who killed the abortion doctor – there is a justifiable reason?  Clearly stated…I am unaware that using a spending disorder as a defense has been successful in achieving a verdict of “not guilty”.   Certainly this case will be watched closely, as there are many white collar criminals who have either embezzled or created Ponzi schemes and lived lavish lifestyles who would welcome the opportunity to be found not guilty by reason of a “spending disorder.”  If this defense wins…I would suspect that Bernie Madoff would be regretting his guilty plea.

IF I were a betting man, I’d bet she’ll face time in prison…but?

YOUR COMMENTS WELCOME!


Sujata Sachdeva – Koss former Executive Charged in $31 Million Fraud – Mental Illness Likely Defense

January 21, 2010

United States Attorney James L. Santelle announced that a grand jury sitting in Milwaukee returned a six-count indictment charging Sujata Sachdeva (46) of Mequon, who is also known as Sue Sachdeva, with six counts of wire fraud.  Ms. Sachdeva is the former Vice President of Finance, Secretary, and Principal Accounting Officer for Koss Corporation, a publicly traded company located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

The indictment alleges that Sachdeva used her position at Koss to fraudulently obtain more than $31 million from Koss, which she used to purchase personal items and pay for personal expenses.  According to the indictment, Sachdeva authorized numerous wire transfers of funds from bank accounts maintained by Koss to pay for her American Express credit card bills.  In addition, Sachdeva used money from Koss’s bank accounts to fund numerous cashier’s checks, which she also used to pay her personal expenses.  Sachdeva used the money she fraudulently obtained from Koss to purchase personal items including women’s clothing, furs, purses, shoes, jewelry, automobiles, china, statues, and other household furnishings.  Sachdeva also used the money to pay for hotels, airline tickets, and other travel expenses for herself and others, to pay for renovations and improvements to her home, and to compensate individuals providing personal services to her and her family.

According to the indictment, Sachdeva sought to conceal her fraud by directing other Koss employees to make numerous fraudulent entries in Koss’s books and records to make it appear that Sachdeva’s fraudulent transfers were legitimate business transactions.  Sachdeva directed Koss employees to conceal her fraudulent transfers as well as the fraudulent entries in Koss’s books and records from Koss’s management and auditors.

According to United States Attorney James L. Santelle “this case is one of the largest embezzlement cases ever brought in this district, and demonstrates the ongoing commitment of this office and the FBI to investigate and prosecute white collar offenses”.
Each count of the indictment carries a maximum possible penalty of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.  Sachdeva, therefore, faces a total maximum penalty of up to 120 years in prison and fines of up to $1.5 million, plus forfeiture of the items identified in the indictment and restitution.

WELL NOW WITH THAT ALL SAID…WHY?

According to her attorney, Michael F. Hart, Esq., principal in the law firm of Kohler & Hart, LLP, and a prominent criminal defense attorney in Milwaukee, one defense planned for Sachdeva is mental health. Hart is quoted as saying, “We intend to show that mental health issues played a substantial role in Ms. Sachdeva’s conduct.”

What kind of mental health issue(s) would he be referring to?  My guess…Compulsive Shopping Addiction or Spending Addiction.  The following is a reprint from a popular web site on the subject (the full article is here).

Most of us who suffer from compulsive shopping addiction (sometimes called spending addiction) are unaware of the problem. After all, everything around us seems to be saying, “Buy, buy, buy!” So…we do! We usually discover the problem only when we run out of money. Then, sadly, we think it’s an income problem. The problem isn’t income…it’s being out of control with the outgo. We addicts tend to spend money to compensate for areas in our lives where we are emotionally out of control or damaged. I’m sure the millionaire’s wife felt neglected for all the years he was pursuing his business goals while she was left with their several children to manage. The problem is triggered by emotion and shows itself as spending but we have to understand the cause of compulsive shopping addiction in order to get a handle on the solution.

Compulsive Shopping Cause

Since most people believe the problem is income, they mis-identify the cause as something outside of themselves; their job, boss, spouse, taxes, the creditors, prices, etc. This form of denial effectively blocks any kind of solution, locking us into an ever deepening problem. Though spending is usually the main symptom, and this, triggered by emotion, the cause goes much deeper. When we continue to pile up spending, the cause is usually rooted in the Spending Cycle: 1. We start with an emptiness, or negative self-esteem; a feeling of incompleteness. 2. Signals all around us tell us if we had some thing, we’d be seen as more important, successful, loveable, or complete, etc. The signals come from family, friends, co-workers, TV, radio, the Internet…anyone who has influence over us. 3. We spend to get that success feeling, sharing news of our shrewd acquisition with anyone who will say, “oooooooo.” 4. When the bills come in we feel even more incomplete and powerless than before, starting the cycle all over again. Until we own the cause as something within us, we will never have a solution. The actual cause of compulsive shopping addiction, then, is that feeling of emptiness and low self-esteem. Solving this incompleteness is key to finding the solution to compulsive shopping addiction.

Now, assuming this is a route the defense is taking, will it be successful?  Only time will tell, but it would appear from a distance look at the facts, it would be hard to argue that she was ‘mentally’ screwed up somehow considering the lifestyle and theft that supported it.  She was educated, so there had to be something other than – oops I didn’t know it was wrong as a defense.  The interesting side of this – is whether there is legal support to find her not guilty by reason of mental insanity?

Now, I’m not a lawyer (I’m a business ethics speaker)…so I would welcome those who are to share their opinions regarding using Compulsive Spending Addiction as a defense.

YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME!